1 / 17

Strengthening Performance Management through Enhanced Wait Time Reporting

Strengthening Performance Management through Enhanced Wait Time Reporting. Haim Sechter: Manager, Reporting and Analytics Jennifer Liu: Team Lead, Reporting and Analytics. Presentation Summary. 1. Cancer Care Ontario background 2. Wait Time Reporting Current data collection and reporting

papina
Download Presentation

Strengthening Performance Management through Enhanced Wait Time Reporting

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Strengthening Performance Management through Enhanced Wait Time Reporting Haim Sechter: Manager, Reporting and Analytics Jennifer Liu: Team Lead, Reporting and Analytics

  2. Presentation Summary • 1. Cancer Care Ontario background • 2. Wait Time Reporting • Current data collection and reporting • New reporting solution • 3. Project delivery, benefits, and lessons learned • 4. Next steps

  3. Cancer Care Ontario (CCO) • Ontario government agency • Drives quality and continuous improvement in cancer, chronic kidney disease, and access to care for key health services • Disease prevention and screening • Delivery of care • Patient experience

  4. Performance Management and Wait Times • CCO monitors and manages wait time performance for various treatments and diagnostic procedures at the provincial and LHIN levels • Works with cancer care providers • to continually improve access, • and publically reports • wait times

  5. Background: Data Collection • Systemic and Radiation Wait Time information calculated from Activity Level Reporting Data (ALR) 14 Regional Cancer Programs > 165,000 radiation and systemic activity records Monthly submission frequency Patient Information Disease Information Health Care Provider data Clinic Visits Systemic Treatment Minor Procedures Radiation Treatment

  6. Background: historical reports

  7. Problem • Labour intensive • Sub-optimal user experience • Inefficient reporting process: information available through multiple channels • Limited Access to information • Delayed after monthly submissions • Historical radiation and systemic treatment wait time reporting: 1 FTE

  8. Solution • Future radiation and systemic treatment wait time reporting: • Wait Times reports available through single web-based application • Information flows directly from EDW • Interactive dashboard summaries at various levels • Increased functionality through drilling, custom metrics, report subscriptions, detailed analysis etc.

  9. Merging of reports into one source

  10. Interactive dashboards

  11. v Increased Functionality

  12. Detailed Analysis

  13. Integrated Data Quality

  14. Project Delivery • Projectelapsed tine: • 24 months elapsed • Actual time: • 6-8 months • Project team: • BI Developer, Data Analyst, Data Architect, ETL Developers, IT Operations, Business Analyst • Project tracking: • weekly core team meetings • Weekly working group meetings

  15. Benefits • ½ FTE redirected to advanced analytics • Time to delivery reduced by 1 week each month • Development of decision support tool • New report structure appeals to a variety of audiences • Easily scalable

  16. Lessons Learned Challenges • Too difficult to continually leverage operation resources • Business must be constantly part of working group • Improve organization understanding of BI • Proper data infrastructure is critical • Strict Project management approach has to be leveraged • Project too big to run through operations • Stakeholders satisfied with status quo • Difficult to gain organizational buy-in • Underlying data not fit for BI reporting • Too many competing priorities

  17. Next Steps • Provincial view of systemic wait times • Improve accuracy of indicators through standardization factors • Integration with automated scorecard

More Related