170 likes | 429 Views
Lifecourse Theory I. Must explain why there is stability (continuity) in antisocial behaviorMust explain childhood precursors to offending (childhood antisocial behavior)Severe (age inappropriate) temper tantrumsDeviant/criminal behaviorMust explain desistence, or
E N D
1. Review Lifecourse Sampson and LaubTerrie Moffitt’s Theory
3. Lifecourse Theory II Types of Lifecourse Theories (From Cullen and Agnew)
Continuity Theories (Trait—G&H)
Continuity and Change Theories (Sampson and Laub, Patterson)
Continuity or Change Theories (Moffitt)
4. Sampson and Laub Important/Popular book: Crime in the Making: Pathways and Turning Points Through Life
First to fully outline “lifecourse” criminology
Put forth a lifecourse theory
Use “Glueck data” to test theory
5. Pathways and Turning Points Pathways = stability
Turning Points = opportunity for change
6. Sampson and Laub’s “Age Graded Theory of Informal Social Control” In what sense is the theory “age graded?”
What does “Informal Social Control” mean?
7. Sampson and Laub
8. Continuity Stability of Trajectory
Individual differences (traits) possible
Cumulative Continuity
Delinquency/crime has effect on “adult social bonds”
Delinquency/crime can lead to incarceration, which also has effect on adult social bonds
These bonds, in turn, have effect on future crime
9. Change Turning Points = Adult Social Bonds
Quality Marriage
Quality Employment
Why would these things reduce crime?
S&L: they increase informal control (bind individuals to society, give them something to lose)
Other explanations (spend less time with criminal friends, etc.)
10. Sampson and Laub II New Book/Articles based on follow-up data from Gleuck sample
Followed until age 70
Similar to original theory
Employment, marriage, military service
More complex-why a “turning point?”
Knife off past from the present/future
Supervision/monitoring (control) but also opportunities for social support/growth
Change to structure/routine activities
Opportunity for identity transformation
11. How do people desist? Desistence by Default
No conscious decision to “stop offending”
Rather, roles, structure, social context changes
Human Agency
Vague concept that implies people have some say in the matter.
Not same as “rational choice” nor is it a “trait”
Interaction = land a good job but still must want to keep
Theoretical Importance
Lives do not “unfold” in predictable sequences
Desistence more difficult to explain than onset or persistence
12. Terrie Moffitt A Stability or Change Theory
Argument:
There are 2 different “kinds” of offenders in the world
These types can be characterized by their unique “offending trajectories”
Failure of Mainstream Criminology?
During adolescence, these two groups look rather similar
13. Moffitt’s 2 Groups of Offenders LCP’s
Early Start, Stable over lifecourse, 5% of general population (small group)
Therefore…
Why start so early? Why so stable?
AL’s
Late starters, desist in adulthood, very prevalent in population
Therefore….
Why start so late? Why desist right away?
14. Explaining the LCP trajectory Presence of “Neuropsychological Deficits”
Where do they come from?
Why do they matter?
INTERACTING WITH
Ineffective Parenting
Monitoring, supervision, etc.
This “dual hazard” puts them on bad path…however…
15. Cumulative Continuity for LCP’s What in the environment is affected?
Peer Rejection
School Failure
Parenting
THEREFORE
Cumulative continuity
Contemporary continuity (still have N.P. Deficit, personality traits)
16. Explaining the AL’s Maturity Gap
Knifing off Bonds as “rewarding”
Mimic
Why do AL’s desist?
However, some may exhibit continuity
“Snares” as another example of cumulative continuity
17. Key Moffitt Questions Why do we need 2 theories?
How does she account for stability and change?
Specific explanations of LCP and AL offending