1 / 19

A National Comparison of Laparoscopic versus Open Colectomy Using NSQIP

A National Comparison of Laparoscopic versus Open Colectomy Using NSQIP. Anthony J Senagore M.D, M.S., M.B.A. VP/CAO, Spectrum Health Professor of Surgery, Michigan State University Grand Rapids, MI. Anxiety About Health Care ($$).

Download Presentation

A National Comparison of Laparoscopic versus Open Colectomy Using NSQIP

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. A National Comparison of Laparoscopic versus Open Colectomy Using NSQIP Anthony J Senagore M.D, M.S., M.B.A. VP/CAO, Spectrum Health Professor of Surgery, Michigan State University Grand Rapids, MI

  2. Anxiety About Health Care ($$) • Employers: premiums growing at 2-3x wages; affecting profits and competitiveness • Consumers: higher out-of-pocket costs keeping real wage growth down; fear of losing insurance; lack of information for confident decisions • Insurers: pressure from employer customers to control rising costs • Doctors and Hospitals: Medicare reimbursement rates; administrative challenges of data collection, performance measurement and reporting

  3. Defining Value • Risk Adjusted Comparison • Outcomes defined • Resource Consumption • Transparency of Reporting • Hospital/Physician Comparison • Informed Consent

  4. Complex Interactions:Quality • Hospital Systems • Diagnostic Equipment/access • Staffing • OR equipment • Operative Technique • Postoperative Care • Preoperative Evaluation/Optimization • Enhanced Recovery Protocols • Post-Discharge care plans

  5. Hospital Issues Beds Personnel OR’s Diagnostic equipment Doctor Issues # admissions/ LOS Complications Case volume/mix Duration of Surgery Equipment used Tests ordered Readmissions Sources of Surgical Cost

  6. Potential Administrative Data Sources • CMS • National Inpatient Census • Premier • ACS-NSQIP • Surgical Risk Formulae

  7. What is NSQIP • 30 day observational database • Trained and audited nurse evaluators • 121 sites in the US (academic and community hospitals)

  8. NSQIP Model vs Others

  9. NSQIP Lap v Open Kennedy et al. Ann Surg 2009;249: 596–601

  10. NSQIP Lap v Open Kennedy et al. Ann Surg 2009;249: 596–601

  11. NSQIP Lap v Open Kennedy et al. Ann Surg 2009;249: 596–601

  12. NSQIP Lap v Open Kennedy et al. Ann Surg 2009;249: 596–601

  13. NSQIP Lap v Open Kennedy et al. Ann Surg 2009;249: 596–601

  14. NSQIP Lap v Open: Outcomes Senagore et al. DCR 2009 52: 183-6

  15. NSQIP Lap v Open: ? cohorts Senagore et al. DCR 2009 52: 183-6

  16. Departmental length of stay 1991-1999 1999 3-6/2000 n LOS n LOS n LOS DRG 148 study team 1784 9.5 185 8.6 62 5.7 * other CR teams 6459 9.8 824 8.8 162 10.1 Laparoscopic 24 3.2 * DRG 149 study team 742 6.4 69 5.2 44 3.5 † other CR teams 2256 6.4 327 5.1 111 4.5 Laparoscopic 18 2.5 * DRG 148 & 149 study team 2526 8.6 254 7.7 106 4.7 § other CR teams 8715 8.9 1151 7.7 273 7.7 Laparoscopic 42 2.9 * * p<0.0001; † p=0.002; §p<0.001, Student’s t test Delaney, Fazio, Senagore et al, Br J Surg, 2001

  17. The Future ??

  18. Conclusion • Belief in a system approach • Align stakeholder incentives • Understanding Cost/Quality Impacts • Report OUR Value Proposition

More Related