310 likes | 431 Views
The following is the proposal of the Futures Task Force for the regeneration of Jackson State University. It is presented to get feedback from the University during the next 30 days. Specific instructions regarding the review process will be posted on the Strategic Planning Website on Monday, Marc
E N D
1. Jackson State University Regeneration Proposal March 25, 2010
2. The following is the proposal of the Futures Task Force for the regeneration of Jackson State University. It is presented to get feedback from the University during the next 30 days. Specific instructions regarding the review process will be posted on the Strategic Planning Website on Monday, March 29, 2010.
3. The State of Mississippi projects 25% in appropriations reductions over FY 2011 and 2012
Jackson State University will lose $12 million
Jackson State University will raise tuition by 9% in FY 2011 and FY 2012
Tuition increases will result in approximately $2 million in additional revenues each FY
The University’s budget will have to be reduced by $8 million over FY 2011 and 2012
4. Stage I – New Academy – FY2011
Approximately $3.5 million in savings will be realized by not filling vacant positions and restructuring
Stage II – New Academy – FY 2012
Savings Goal is $4.5 million
Faculty-driven academic restructuring through synergies, collaborations, and investment prioritization
TASK: Reduce budget AND reposition the University for future excellence.
5. Vision Statement
Building on its historic mission of empowering diverse students to become leaders, Jackson State University will become recognized as a challenging, yet nurturing, state-of-the-art technologically-infused intellectual community. Students and faculty will engage in creative research, participate in interdisciplinary and multi-institutional / organizational collaborative learning teams, and serve the global community.
Mission Statement
The University produces technologically-advanced, diverse, ethical, global leaders who think critically, address societal problems, and compete effectively.
6. Enhance Student Competitiveness
Core Competencies
Establish Institutional Greatness
Centers of Excellence
Create a Futuristic, Globally-Oriented, Technologically-Infused Collaborative Learning Environment
Gateway Learning Communities
Core Teaching Faculties
Interdisciplinary Synergies
Diversify Resources and Develop Synergies through Institutional / Organizational Partnerships (Private and Public Sectors)
Cut the Budget by $8 million during Fiscal Years 2011 and 2012
8. Graduate globally competitive student / leaders
Empower student participation in personalized learning design
Engage faculty as the “minds and hearts” of the New Academy
Create effective learning foundations through collaborations and technology (Gateway Learning Communities / Core Teaching Faculties)
Connect research to real world issues (Centers for Global Solutions)
9. Graduate globally competitive student / leaders
Enhance programs that transition students to Jackson State University (Bridges)
Immerse underprepared entering students in a rigorous learning / living environment to improve academic and life skills (Core I)
Ensure that students obtain the Core Global Competencies (Core II)
Expose students to broad areas of knowledge (Knowledge Exploration)
10. Empower student participation in personalized learning design
Enhance counseling infrastructure
Execute “living / learning” contracts
11. Engage faculty as the “minds and hearts” of the New Academy
Faculty provide input in designing the roles of the dean and department chairs
Faculty select the deans and faculty chairs
Faculty recommend guidelines for a dual tenure track system which rewards both excellent teaching and excellent research
Faculty develop the admissions criteria for upper-level entry into the Centers of Excellence Faculties
Faculty are accountable for quality teaching, research, and learning
Faculty develop inter school / college / discipline synergies and collaborations
12. Create effective learning foundations through collaborations and technology (Gateway Learning Communities / Core Teaching Faculties)
Design unique and rigorous Core I and Core II Learning Continuum
Establish highly skilled Core I and Core II faculties
Use technology to encourage greater student interactive learning
13. Connect research to real world issues (Centers for Global Solutions)
Computing
Health Disparities
Urban Research and Development
Homeland Security
15. Bridges facilitate entry into Jackson State
16. Core I – Rigorous, Nurturing Learning / Living
17. Core II – Rigorous University Core
Every student works closely with a counselor and faculty mentor (the “Success Team”) to develop a living / learning contract (the “Success Contract”)
19. Knowledge Exploration
Gateway learning completed
Initial major requirements explored
Broad academic offerings
Service Learning
Africana Studies
Detailed planning of Success Contracts
21. Focused or Liberal Learning
22. Lifelong Learning
29. Increase SMART classrooms and desks and computer budgets for classrooms and laboratories, respectively
Exempt priority areas from cuts
College of Education and Human Development
Undergraduate life and studies
Security
Institutional Advancement
QEP
Institutional Effectiveness
Remove vacant, etc. positions and balance budgets proportionally each FY with savings
30. Faculties develop dual track tenure processes
Faculties develop upper tier admissions criteria for Centers of Excellence
Faculties develop academic strategic implementation plan
Liberal Arts faculty develop flexible degree options similar to professional interdisciplinary studies
Faculties develop new Core I, Core II, and Knowledge Exploration (second year experience)
Faculties define approaches to lifelong learning, graduate, and international studies
31. Faculties (excluding adjuncts) select Deans / Chairs AY 2011-2012
Asset reallocation priorities
Synergistic
Cross-Structural
Vision, mission, and value appropriate
Reallocation process determined by Provost and Faculty Senate
Final decisions made by the Administrative Cabinet
32. Preview of the Futures Task Force recommendations by the Organizational Leadership of the University (e.g., Executive Committees of the Student Government Association, the Faculty Senate, the Staff Senate, and the Alumni Association)
Publication of the Recommendations Report on the Strategic Planning Website
Town Hall meeting describing the recommendations with Dr. Mason, Dr. Okojie, Dr. Brown, and The Barthwell Group
Meetings with groups of University stakeholders to review the recommendations and receive input
Report by The Barthwell Group regarding input from the Review Process and recommendations for any revisions
Final Approval of the Recommendations by the Futures Task Force
Publication of the Final Recommendations on the Strategic Planning Website
Submission to IHL of any changes in the New Academy requiring approval