1 / 1

Strategic Surface Route Plan Methodology: Old vs. New

Strategic Surface Route Plan Methodology: Old vs. New. Pre–SSRP. Post–SSRP. pure. pure. Ad-Hoc decision making Based on Air route plans Little consideration for volume, cost, or velocity. Considers volume, cost and velocity Vets decisions with stakeholders. Supply Support Activity #2.

raja
Download Presentation

Strategic Surface Route Plan Methodology: Old vs. New

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Strategic Surface Route Plan Methodology: Old vs. New Pre–SSRP Post–SSRP pure pure • Ad-Hoc decision making • Based on Air route plans • Little consideration for volume, cost, or velocity • Considers volume, cost and velocity • Vets decisions with stakeholders Supply Support Activity #2 Supply Support Activity #2 Supply Support Activity #1 Supply Support Activity #1 Depot / CCP Depot / CCP mixed 40’ • Developed independently by Depots & CCP locations • Methodology inconsistent across organizations • Non-iterative • Fusion Center develops in partnership with GSA, DLA, DDC, and COCOMs • Methodology consistent across organizations • Iterative, supporting continuous process improvement pure TCSP or CRSP 40’ 40’ 40’ pure • Poorly utilized containers cost inefficiencies • Long CCP hold time  increased CWT • Strategic use of container type, mixed containers to maximize cost efficiency • Improves (or holds constant) Velocity

More Related