From PHARE to ATC

1. From PHARE to ATC A. Vink Domain Leader ATC, EUROCONTROL

2. Picking up the results of PHARE in EUROCONTROL • The PHARE programme has researched and demonstrated the operational and technical feasibility of using ATC Data Processing tools • The EATCHIP III programme has developed common European requirements and generic specifications for ATC Data Processing tools • Convergence of programmes is apparent : • inside EUROCONTROL : PHARE and EATCHIP III • with other programmes : EU-CINCAT and FAA-FFP1

3. R & D convergence PHARE tools EATCHIP III (EATMP)tools EU CINCAT tools FAA FFP1 tools • trajectory predictor • conflict probe • flight path monitor • co-operative tool • problem solver • arrival manager • departure manager • tact.load smoother • negotiation manag. • trajectory predicto • MTCD • MONA • HMI devices • CORA • AMAN • DMAN • Multi Sector Plan. • CPDLC • trajectory predictor • conflict probe • flight path monitor • co-operative tools : • filtering device • activity predictor • extrapolation tool • surveillance aid • flight profile • URET • in URET • DSR • CTAS/TMA pFAST • SMA • CDM • CPDLC Builds feasibility demonstrated • agreed ORD/specs similar tools convergence

4. R& D  Implementation • The ATC/DP domains have a stake in applied ATC research • The ATC/DP domains’ raison d’être is implementation • Implementation responsibility with ATC Service Providers • The road between research and operations is long and the gaps are wide • “R&D must choose between ownership and implementation, it rarely goes together” • Tools similar to PHARE have been implemented • Use windows of opportunity for implementations

5. R& D  Operations EATCHIP III (EATMP)tools Implementation examples (Europe) PHARE tools • trajectory predicto • MTCD • MONA • HMI devices • CORA • AMAN • DMAN • Multi Sector Plan. • CPDLC • various local FDPS • ACOD (Amsterdam), ERATO plans (F) • Amsterdam, Brussels, SACTA (Esp), ERATO • ERATO plans in France, ODID based implem. • HIPS Oceanic, VERA Maastricht UAC • Amsterdam, Paris, Frankfurt, Copenhagen • Amsterdam, LATCC, Brussels CANAC • PETAL trials at Maastricht UAC • trajectory predictor • conflict probe • flight path monitor • co-operative tool • problem solver • arrival manager • departure manager • tact.load smoother • negotiation manag.

6. ATC/DP Domains strategy • The ATC tool development work is continued in the EATMP programmes assigned to the ATC / Data Processing Domains • Automated Support to ATC programme • Air/Ground Co-operative ATS programme • The ATM 2000+ strategy is driving the EATMP ATC/Data Processing domains • The ATC/DP domains have defined “Concept Elements”, to build ATM 2000+

7. Performance driven ATC/DP development • ATC/DP domains keyword : “performance driven” • Safety, Capacity, Cost and Environment objectives of ATC/DP Concept Elements must be quantified • “if you haven’t measured, you can’t change” • PHARE has proven operational and technical feasibility, but quantification is to be completed • The ATC domain has launched a new collaborative R & D project (INTEGRA), to achieve : • measurement techniques • measured results

8. Conclusion Feasibility • PHARE has demonstrated operational and technical feasibility of ATC tools • Quantification of benefits required Development • EATCHIP III has developed common European Requirements and Specifications • EATMP ATC/DP programmes will continue to develop ATM 2000+ “Concept Elements” O w n e r s h I p Implementation • Performance driven approach • Commitment through Convergence and Implementation Plan • Strategy Work Plan Budget

9. From PHARE to ATC A. Vink Domain Leader ATC, EUROCONTROL next