read ❤️(✔️pdf✔️) Debating Same-Sex Marriage (Point/Counterpoint)

May 10, 2024

0 likes | 21 Views

Copy Link : https://sagegeoleach-kindle.blogspot.com/?kindle=0199756317 | Debating Same-Sex Marriage (Point/Counterpoint) | Polls and election results show Americans sharply divided on samesex marriage and the controversy is unlikely to subside anytime soon Debating SameSex Marriage provides an indispensable roadmap to the ongoing debate Taking a pointcounterpoint approach John Corvino a philosopher and prominent gay advocate and Maggie Gallagher a nationally syndicated columnist and cofounder of the National Organization for Marriage explore fundamental questions What is m

Share Presentation

Embed Code

Link

reygeobriggs

Download Presentation

read ❤️(✔️pdf✔️) Debating Same-Sex Marriage (Point/Counterpoint)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

DEBATING TRADE

DEBATING TRADE. Principles of Microeconomic Theory, ECO 284 John Eastwood CBA 247 523-7353 John.Eastwood@nau.edu www.cba.nau.edu/eastwood-j. The Competitiveness Argument . “Free trade is beneficial only if your country is strong enough to stand up to foreign competition.”

450 views • 17 slides

Debating Skills

Debating Skills. Citizenship Miss Atwell Friday 11 th June 2010. Learning Objectives. To know the roles of individuals during a debate. To understand the debate process. To be able to identify the skills required in order to form an argument. . Key terms.

283 views • 4 slides

COACHING DEBATING

COACHING DEBATING. GENERAL GUIDELINES. CONTENTS. Foreword Selecting Speakers Squad Rotation Speaker Roles Setting Objectives Team Dynamics Training Logistics Structuring Training Training Stuff Warm & Fuzzy Feelings Competition Time Tips & Niceties 3 4 10 12 17 20

855 views • 67 slides

Debating Guide

Debating Guide. Roles and tasks. Debating Guide.

257 views • 11 slides

Debating Topicality

Debating Topicality. Keeping Order. What is Topicality?. A gateway issue Says that the affirmative plan is not an example of the resolution. Structure of Topicality. Interpretation – read evidence to define what the resolution means

582 views • 19 slides

Debating Removal

Debating Removal. Kathryn H. Braund. Please read:. 1. William Penn essay (105) 2. Catherine Beecher Circular (111) 3. Lewis Cass (115) 4. John Ross Letter 5. Elias Boudinot Letter (161). How can these documents. Be used to teach critical thinking skills?

181 views • 6 slides

Debating 101

Debating 101. What’s the deal?. 3v3 Affirmative team and Negative team 30 minutes prep Each team comes up with arguments to support or oppose the motion and rebuttal Each speaker speaks for 6-8 minutes, alternating between affirmative and negative. Things debating is not.

436 views • 18 slides

Debating Toolbox

Debating Toolbox. What is wrong with this argument?. Watch this short clip and discuss http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xTg2ExwioPM. They don’t set time to listen to each other’s ideas They have not thought about what they are going to say and stray off topic

335 views • 14 slides

Debating Vegetarianism

Debating Vegetarianism. Learning Target. I can present a claim and findings in a logical manner with relevant evidence and well-chosen details. Effective Debaters. Research , they know what they’re talking about! Present strong claims supported with evidence in a logical manner.

385 views • 11 slides

Debating!

Debating!. 7 volunteers for a little “debate” 8 minutes to discuss the following statement: 17 year old girls are smarter than 17 year old boys. Debriefing. Can you guess what your label was? On what cues did you base your guess?

435 views • 21 slides

Debating….

Debating…. How? Who? What happens?. Key Terms. Debate: a game in which two opposing teams make speeches to support their arguments and disagree with those of the other team. Resolution: the opinion about which two teams argue. Affirmative team: agrees with the resolution.

323 views • 13 slides

Debating Group

Debating Group. Yasamin Jerome Hugo Errol Matt Martin. “There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics.” . What does it mean?. To describe the persuasive power of numbers The use of statistics to bloster weak arguments

441 views • 26 slides

Debating Confederation

Debating Confederation. Today- referendum- the people give their opinion directly by voting for or against an issue Confederation- Government either made the decision on its own OR held an election. LOTS of Opinions.

216 views • 9 slides

Debating Disease

Debating Disease. 2012 GMU DEBATE INSTITUTE Ivan Kyagaba and Young Kwon. 1918 Spanish Flu Pandemic K illed 20-40 million people—number is higher than people killed in WW1 Movement of Armies/Trade Routes=spread of strain/poor living condition.

181 views • 8 slides

Debating Enormity

Debating Enormity. Nuclear Proliferation in the 21 st Century http://www.youtube.com/watch?v= dDTBnsqxZ3k. Part 1: Debating International Relations. What are we talking about?. The “fiction” of the nation-state

597 views • 46 slides

Debating

G. García - Soza. Debating. Debate is a method of interactive and representational argument. A debate is a contest, or, perhaps, like a game, where two or more speakers present their arguments intent on persuading one another. John Stuart Mill, in his Autobiography, said,

390 views • 15 slides

DEBATING SEMINAR

DEBATING SEMINAR. What Debating Is All About. Debating is Basically About 3 things (could be 4): Persuading People Convincing People Educating People Through Your Arguments Winning(Optional). Definition. A definition should be FAIR and DEBATABLE .

546 views • 14 slides

DEBATING TRADE

DEBATING TRADE. Principles of Microeconomic Theory, ECO 284 John Eastwood CBA 247 523-7353 John.Eastwood@nau.edu www.cba.nau.edu/eastwood-j. The Competitiveness Argument. “Free trade is beneficial only if your country is strong enough to stand up to foreign competition.”

286 views • 17 slides

DEBATING

DEBATING. A Guide for Teachers and Schools. Schedule. General Types of Debates Speaker Roles Adjudicating Debates Benefits of Debating Mock Debate Questions. General. Style Structure and Strategy Rebuttal Points of Information To Be Avoided. Style. How the content is presented

828 views • 26 slides

Philosophical Debating

Philosophical Debating. 101. What is a debate. A formal method of presenting an argument(s) in support of or against a given issue. A debater’s goal is to present sufficient reason and evidence to persuade an audience or a group of judges. Common terms.

315 views • 16 slides

Persuasive Debating

Persuasive Debating. Introduction. Is debating Biblical? Is debating culturally relevant?. Different types of debates. Formal University / Town Hall Informal Café / Community Church. Principles of Debating. A Clear Question Listening Elucidation | Education | Entertainment

99 views • 6 slides

[READ DOWNLOAD] Debating Euthanasia (Debating Law)

14 minutes ago - COPY LINK TO DOWNLOAD : https://koencoeng-ygtersakity.blogspot.mx/?lophe=1849461783 | [PDF READ ONLINE] Debating Euthanasia (Debating Law) | In this new addition to the 'Debating Law' series, Emily Jackson and John Keown re-examine the legal and ethical aspects of the euthanasia debate.Emily Jackson argues that we owe it to everyone in society to do all that we can to ensure that they experience a 'good death'. For a small minority of patients who experience intolerable and unrelievable suffering, this may mean helping them to have an assisted death. In a liberal society, where people's moral views differ, we should not force individuals to experience deaths they find intolerable. This is not an argument in favour of dying. On the contrary, Jackson argues that legalisation could extend and enhance the lives of people whose present fear of the dying process causes them overwhelming distress. John Keown argues that voluntary euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide are gravely unethical and he defends their continued prohibition by law. He analyses the main arguments for relaxation of the law - including those which invoke the experience of jurisdictions which permit these practices - and finds them wanting. Relaxing the law would, he concludes, be both wrong in principle and dangerous in practice, not least for the dying, the disabled and the disadvantaged.

14 views • 4 slides

More Related