110 likes | 244 Views
Beam MC activity. A.K.Ichikawa for beam group. For more details, http ://jnusrv01.kek.jp/~ichikawa/jhfnu/nubeam/beamMCsummary.091203.ichikawa.pdf. Summary of update in 09a,b,c. 09a
E N D
Beam MC activity A.K.Ichikawa for beam group For more details, http://jnusrv01.kek.jp/~ichikawa/jhfnu/nubeam/beamMCsummary.091203.ichikawa.pdf
Summary of update in 09a,b,c • 09a • This is almost equivalent to 07a except some bugs were fixed. Those bugs would not influence the neutrino flux iteslef. • 09b • Mainly, geometry of baffle, target, 1st horn, dump and MUMON is updated. • 09c • MUMON structures were included. • Energy deposit in the MUMON detector can be stored. • Emittance and Twiss parameters can be specified via card. • Neutrino tracking is discarded. • The density of the dump concrete was changed from 2.2 to 2.3g/cm3.
K. Matsuoka Comparison among different versions
K. Matsuoka MUMON A few bugs introduced in 2009 were found and fixed. Mainly in horn1. • Magnetic field (proportional to 1/r) starts from r=2.7cm • Horn1 inner conductor • Inner radius = 2.7cm, outer radius=3cm • Originally it starts from 3cm • Actually, something between them (skin depth > 5mm) • For MUMON, a few% effect
A.Arigaet. al. Muon flux at muon pitSpring commissioning (1st horn only)Emulsion v.s. MC 0kA Data/MC=0.57 220kA Data/MC=0.75 273kA Data/MC=0.78
H.Kubo horn2 and horn3 Geometry update update from conceptual shape to real shape • Horn2 • outer conductor radius : 40 cm -> 49.048 cm • B-field region (Z-length) : 200 cm ->195.7 cm • Horn3 • outer conductor radius : 70 cm 65.5 cm • B-field region (Z-length) : 250 cm 247.1 cm • Muonflux@MUMON decreased by 3%, profile shape is same http://jnusrv01.kek.jp/Indico/getFile.py/access?contribId=0&resId=0&materialId=slides&confId=147
Horn2&3 geometry updateneutrino flux 09b new less than 5% difference upto 5GeV nm@SK Far/Near
Parents of muons in muon pit-pions- Horn off 1st Horn 273kA All horns 320kA H.Kubo. K.Matsuoka
K. Matsuoka Proton information • Store primary beam information in a common block and MUMON or neutrino ntuple. • libneubeam/beaminfo.inc • integer gipart : Primary generated particle ID • real gpos0(3) : Generation point • common /gbeam/gipart, gpos0 • Accumulate POT w/ a flat proton beam. • Weight the muon profile w/ an arbitrary proton profile by using gpos0. • We do not need to make many MC data sets of various proton beam profile.
H.Kubo new ND flux calculation algorithm • current filling routine • SK : treated as a “point”. generated neutrino is always filled acceptance of SK for each decay is included in “norm”. • ND : repeat parent’s decay randomly (uniformly in CM) by N times (default 1,000). only neutrinos which have proper angle are filled. • New method : fill ND ntuple just the same method as one of SK. • choose a detection point (x, y) randomly in the ND plane • calculate weight (acceptance) for this direction using parent 4-momentum • same method with SK ntuple. • Motivation • In the current version, high-energy pions are multiply used. Events are not independent. Simple error couting results in underestimate. • Status • Coding is almost done. Under check. http://jnusrv01.kek.jp/Indico/getFile.py/access?contribId=0&resId=0&materialId=slides&confId=162
Remaining issues towards Dec.(Jan.) mass production • Received requests from ND280 beam group • Received a request from Hiro • To check new ND280 algorithm, want flux in both old and new algorithm • Need to be done • final(?) check of new ND algorithm • final(?) check of mag. field inside conductor • correct ND280 position • Optimization of proton beam area • two flat area? • check of Nicolas commitment and decide which should be stored for mass production version • Random seed control?