150 likes | 329 Views
Skills System Review Technical Task Team . HRDC Summit March 2014 . AIM of Task Team. To review the current skills development system and to determine whether the sector based approach to skills development is the best model for delivering skills in the country. Methodology /Process.
E N D
Skills System Review Technical Task Team HRDC Summit March 2014
AIM of Task Team To review the current skills development system and to determine whether the sector based approach to skills development is the best model for delivering skills in the country
Methodology /Process • Terms of reference • Research • International: 5 countries – UK, Brazil, Netherlands, Singapore, Germany • Desk research – many previous reports • Local: SETAs, QCTO, NSA, regional structures, NSF, DHET Skills Branch • Workshops • 4. Stakeholder Engagement • Large businesses, organised business and SETAs • Small businesses and organised small business • Organised Labour • NEDLAC Community constituency – women, co-operatives, people with disabilities, youth • The DHET Skills Branch Management • HRD Council and individual members
Focus Areas Linked to structure of the Report Background and purpose Problem statement Skills system environment Overview of international literature Vision and Mission Fundamentals Key outcomes Existing Skills System Models Recommendations on building a new skills system Proposed road map for implementation
Skills system focus: • The Department of Higher Education and Training and the Skills Branch • National Skills Fund • National Skills Authority • Quality Council for Trades and Occupations • Functions located in 21 SETAs Key lessons from the current system analysis: • Fundamentals are complex • Difficulties in responding to needs • Silos
Problem statement 16 key areas There is a general sentiment that SETAs are not assisting in addressing the skills shortages that are holding back economic growth and which act as a barrier to inward investment and job creation. Quote: DHET Guidelines on Implementation of Seta regulations • Impact on the economy • Skills needs • Low and unmet expectations • Poor linkages • Funding & management of funds • Addressing current and future needs • Qualifications vs competence • A confusing QA system • Accessibility • Complexity of public sector skills framework • Governance • Bureaucratic inefficiencies • Effectiveness and efficiency questioned • Structural issues • Challenges in the management of the skills system • No single or simple solution to the problems
Key Learnings • Wide agreement on problem statement, vision, key fundamentals and outcomes • Sector silos a major constraint on the system • There is a need to: • Design and build a long term sustainable system • Put increased effort into making the fundamentals work • Have wide consultation • Have an implementation plan that does not disrupt delivery.
Vision An inclusive and integrated skills system that is responsive to the needs of the economy and society now and in the future. • An effective skills system will need: • Ramping up • Strong partnerships and buy in from all sized business • Skills part of wider agreement on economy • Link skills system, education system and workplace • Meeting current and future needs • Balance employer and development needs • Addressing real skills needs • Contributing to growth, productivity and employment
Fundamentals • Identification of sector skills needs • Strategic skills planning • Learning interventions: development and implementation • An inclusive system • Provider profile • Policy alignment • Monitoring & Evaluation • Quality Assurance • Governance and leadership • An effective & credible funding model • Human capacity • Brokering partnerships and collaboration • Effective back office functions and shared services
No single organizing principle • No single organizing principle will work for South Africa • An inflexible system that does not allow for elements of each one will also not work • Inflexibility due to the way governance has been structured with boards in each of 21 sectors. Agreeing national priorities is difficult • The recommendation: remove the sector-based accounting authorities, establish a single governance structure for the entire skills system, retain many of the sector structures, but not all, and different structures will be provided for.
National Skills Council • Planning, Management of funds • Shared services • Standard setting and QA of provisioning • Monitoring and evaluation • Local Structures • Liaison with local municipalities and stakeholders • Develop projects • Managing funds allocated • Monitoring and reporting • Sector Bodies • Serve the needs of particular sectors • Skills research • Skills development implementation • Provincial Structures • Needs assessment • Skills interventions implementation • Monitoring reporting and evaluation Stakeholders NGOs / Co-ops Employers from large to SMME’s Learners
Conclusions • Principles & framework for decision making. • An “integrated skills system” debate, not a “landscape” review • Skills System recommendations • Hybrid model with National skills council, provincial and local structures with blend of sector, supply chain, occupational • Managing change • Strategic decision for change – the status quo is not going to address current or future challenges • Human Resources • Develop the skills of those employed in the system Follow the summit@ #hrdcsummit