1 / 21

Prof. Dr. Andrey A.Konoplyanik , Advisor to Director General, Gazprom export LLC,

Российский газ: Сотрудничество со странами ЕС и АТР - эволюция подходов Russian gas: cooperation with EU & Asia Pacific - evolution of the model. Prof. Dr. Andrey A.Konoplyanik , Advisor to Director General, Gazprom export LLC,

sef
Download Presentation

Prof. Dr. Andrey A.Konoplyanik , Advisor to Director General, Gazprom export LLC,

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Российский газ: Сотрудничество со странами ЕС и АТР - эволюция подходовRussian gas: cooperation with EU & Asia Pacific - evolution of the model Prof. Dr. Andrey A.Konoplyanik, Advisor to Director General, Gazprom export LLC, Professor, Chair “International Oil & Gas Business”, Russian State Gubkin Oil & Gas University www.konoplyanik.ru Presentation at Plenary Session 2 “New Choice of Russia: domestic market or export-oriented policy, East or West?”. – VI International Conference “ENERGETIKA XXI: economy, policy, ecology” “Russian energy: choice for XXI century strategy”,Saint-Petersburg, 29 November 2013

  2. Disclaimer • Views expressed in this presentation do not necessarily reflect (may/should reflect) and/or coincide (may/should be consistent) with official position of Gazprom Group (incl. Gazprom JSC and/or Gazprom export LLC), its stockholders and/or its/their affiliated persons, and are within full personal responsibility of the author of this presentation. A.Konoplyanik, ENERGETIKA-XXI, SPB, 29.11.2013

  3. Russia - EU A.Konoplyanik, ENERGETIKA-XXI, SPB, 29.11.2013

  4. New RF models for EU • Diversification of delivery routes: at least two pipelines to each key market • Risk evaluation/mitigation: from state planning & direct control of single supply routes - to competitive choice of multiple routes (costs X risks) • Economic justification of new pipelines: not new gas but to exclude transit monopoly (by-passes) • Changing contractual structures & pricing mechanisms: • To live in new architecture of the EU gas market (from chain of 3 bundled LTC to E-E unbundled zones with VTP) • Capacity market: to live in unbundled gas market (as a shipper only) • Commodity market: to live in oversupplied market (gas-to-gas competition) A.Konoplyanik, ENERGETIKA-XXI, SPB, 29.11.2013

  5. New modelfor EU #1: diversification of delivery routes • Adaptation of the model which has been in place since 1968 & have been effectively working till 2009 (single route + 3 LTC to each market) • From single transport/pipeline route (UA GTS) + LTC Groningen type with oil/PP-indexation to multiple routes (min 2 routes to each key EU market): • To NWE (to Vaidhaus – same DP) = UA GTS + (Nordstream + OPAL + Gazelle): • Jan’06 + Jan’09 UA transit crises • To SE (new DP - moved from Baumgarten to Italian border) = UA GTS + South Stream (offshore + onshore): • (i) Jan’06 + Jan’09 UA transit crises + • (ii) Dec’05/May’07 TAG auction as result of Oct’03 trilateral GP/ENI/CEC agreement on “destination clauses” A.Konoplyanik, ENERGETIKA-XXI, SPB, 29.11.2013

  6. Ukrainian by-passes: alternative gas pipelines to major RUS markets in EU (2 routes for each market) • Delivery points: • Baumgarten • Waidhaus • Saint Katarine • Mallnow 1 2 3 4 4 3 2 1 1 2 • Bottlenecks at UA route to Southern EU (justification for South Stream): • UA transit crises Jan’06/Jan’09 • TAG auctions Dec’05/May’07 1 2 A.Konoplyanik, ENERGETIKA-XXI, SPB, 29.11.2013

  7. New model for EU #2: Evolution of gas value chain & pricing mechanism of Russian gas to EU (1) Past (Pre-2009) – growing EU market Oil-indexation Oil-indexation Gazprom Wholesale EU buyers/ resellers End-use EU customers Common interests Nowadays (Post-2009) – oversupplied (in NWE segment - ?) EU market with not yet clear future trends Request for hub-indexation where hubs are rel.liquid Gazprom as price-taker from oil market Gazprom as price-taker from oil market Gazprom as price-taker from OIL market Hub-indexation Oil-indexation End-use EU customers Gazprom Wholesale EU buyers/ resellers EU hubs Non-EU customers (f.i. reverse flows to CIS/UA) Request for hub-indexation both where hubs are relat.liquid & where there is no hubs (under threat of arbitration) Common interests A.Konoplyanik, ENERGETIKA-XXI, SPB, 29.11.2013

  8. New model for EU #2: Evolution of gas value chain & pricing mechanism of Russian gas to EU (2) Future (“NO GO” contractual scheme under any (?) supply-demand scenario) Hub-indexation Hub-indexation End-use EU customer Gazprom Wholesale EU buyer / reseller Traditional flexibility for buyer (TOP) Common interests – downgrading price spiral for (RUS) gas Gazprom as price-taker from GAS BUYER’s market (with no participation on it)? => NO GO Future (what competitive niche for oil-indexed LTC in DELIVERIES to EU?) Oil-indexation Hub-indexation Role of DG COMP? Wholesale EU buyer / reseller (delivery) End-use EU customers (delivery) Gazprom Oil Gazprom as one of price-makers at EU market? Hub-indexation EU hubs (trade) Direct supplies to EU end-users Common interests A.Konoplyanik, ENERGETIKA-XXI, SPB, 29.11.2013

  9. Russia – Asia Pacific A.Konoplyanik, ENERGETIKA-XXI, SPB, 29.11.2013

  10. New RUS modelfor Asia Pacific: proactive approach? • Adaptation of the model which is not in place and is just being developed • From single transportation route (pipeline to China)/economic model (one exported good) to multiple: • Oil:from transportation of crude to also dev’t of petrochemical cluster in East Siberia (PP) => demand for innovations, infrastructure & industrial development of East Siberia + PP price rent • Gas: from pipeline to China (Gazprom) to both pipeline and/or series of LNG plants (GP + Independents): Sakhalin-2 (Gazprom) + Sakhalin-1 (Rosneft) + Vladivostok LNG (Gazprom) + Yamal LNG(Novatek) +… A.Konoplyanik, ENERGETIKA-XXI, SPB, 29.11.2013

  11. Two options of Russian gas export to China: which price is higher • Export by pipeline: • Delivery point: cross-border RF-China (North-West of China) • Pricing: replacement value => replacing fuel = (i) coal or (ii) imported LNG • Contract price formula: • (i) coal-indexation (China) vs oil-indexation (RF/EU); • (ii) LNG CIF coast less transportation costs from SE to NW China (LNG price linked to JCC or HH) • Export by LNG: • Delivery point: China coastal area (South-East China) • Pricing: replacement value => replacing fuel = imported LNG • Contract price formula: LNG CIF coast SE China • => Russian LNG export price to China should be higher than pipeline export price due to specific configuration of Russia-China economic geography (?) A.Konoplyanik, ENERGETIKA-XXI, SPB, 29.11.2013

  12. Thank you for your attention!www.konoplyanik.ruandrey@konoplyanik.rua.konoplyanik@gazpromexport.com

  13. Reserve slides A.Konoplyanik, ENERGETIKA-XXI, SPB, 29.11.2013

  14. New RUS model for EU gas market: reactive approach • Reason for changes: new gas world since 2009: • Demand-side (economic crisis + subsidized RES + coal vs gas competition + reaction to high GP oil-indexed prices) • Supply-side (US shale gas revolution domino effects; Qatari “garbage gas” prior to Fukushima) • Institutional (3rd EU Energy Package) • Political (RF-UA gas transit crises => consequences for EU/Ukraine/Russia) A.Konoplyanik, ENERGETIKA-XXI, SPB, 29.11.2013

  15. Russia-EU-Ukraine’s new circumstances: 22 days vs. 40+ years • “Matrix effect” & “Domino effect”:22 days of interruptions of Russian gas supplies to the EU via Ukraine (3 days in Jan’2006 + 19 days in Jan’2009): • has overbalanced previous 40+ years (since 1968) of stable & non-interruptible supplies=> • Has changed perceptions within all three parties on stability & non-interruptible character of future gas supply through this chain => each party has its own vision & answers • New perceptions => political statements & decisions => legal documents => investment decisions for new equilibrium to be reached => • “No return” points for each party => What are they? Whether they are reached already? A.Konoplyanik, ENERGETIKA-XXI, SPB, 29.11.2013

  16. EU-Ukraine-Russia: in search for new post-2009 equilibrium with different aims & different responds • EU: • to diminish dominant role of Russia as major supplier • Ukraine: • to escape monopoly of Russia as one single supplier • Russia: • to escape monopoly of Ukraine as one dominant transit route A.Konoplyanik, ENERGETIKA-XXI, SPB, 29.11.2013

  17. New risks, new challenges, new responds, “no return” points: the EU (1) • Perception: as if non-reliable future supplies from Russia via Ukraine to EU => • Responds: organization of new internal EU gas market architecture with multiple supplies & (high) flexibility • Multiple supplies by: • Alternatives to Russian gas (supply side): SOS Directive (3 gas supply sources/MS, etc.), LNG, shale gas, UGS=> to diminish dominant role of Russia as major supplier • Alternatives to (RUS) gas (demand side): climate change => decarbonization=> RES, energy efficiency => shrinking gas share in fuel mix => the loser would be a less competitive gas supplier (perception: most distant & costly Russian gas?) A.Konoplyanik, ENERGETIKA-XXI, SPB, 29.11.2013

  18. New risks, new challenges, new responds, “no return” points: the EU (2) • (High) flexibility by: • Diminishing barriers for gas flows: CMP rules (UIOLI, SoP, interconnectors, reverse flows, spot trade, demand for softening LTGEC provisions (TOP), …, new market organization => Third Energy Package • Third Energy Package (03.09.2009 => 03.03.2012): • Set of legal instruments providing multiple supplies & flexibility within EU & Energy Community Treaty area based on new principles of internal market organization • from a chain of 3 consecutive LTCs (1968-2009) – to Entry-Exit zones with Virtual Trading Points (hubs) • New architecture of EU gas market under development => Gas Target Model + 12 Framework Guidelines+ 12 Network Codes + (???) • => “No return” point has been passed by EU !!! A.Konoplyanik, ENERGETIKA-XXI, SPB, 29.11.2013

  19. New risks, new challenges, new responds, “no return” points: Ukraine (1) • UA: Euro-integration vs. CIS-integration => this “no return” point was passed in 2004 => Euro-integration choice => • Since Spring’2004 => UA demand to unbundle supply & transit contracts & to move to “European formulas” in RUS-UA gas trade: • UA expectations: to receive higher transit rates • UA reality: has received higher import prices • Since 2006/2009: UA disagreement on import pricing formula & price level resulted from move to “European formulas”=> transit crises Jan’2006 & Jan’2009 resulted, inter alia, from disagreements on supply contracts • Perception of further RUS supply risks => search for multiple supplies => to escape monopoly of Russia as one single supplier => A.Konoplyanik, ENERGETIKA-XXI, SPB, 29.11.2013

  20. New risks, new challenges, new responds, “no return” points: Ukraine (2) • UA economic & legal motivation to diminish dependence on RUS gas supplies: • Economic: High import price & RUS/Gazprom unwillingness to soften pricing policy (no price review results achieved yet) stipulates UA search for: • alternatives to RUS gas (supply side): domestic production – onshore & offshore, shale gas, LNG import, reverse flows & UGS & • to deviate from (RUS) gas (demand side): switch gas to coal, nuclear, energy saving & improving efficiency • Legal: Euro-integration policy, membership in Energy Community Treaty => implementation of EU energy acquis (Third EU Energy Package) in UA => legal obligations for alternative supplies, interconnectors, reverse flows, unbundling Naftogas Ukraine, MTPA => new & incremental risks for transit via Ukraine • “No return” point is almost reached? If not yet (?)– is it just a matter of time (trend towards “away from Russian gas” is not to be changed?)? A.Konoplyanik, ENERGETIKA-XXI, SPB, 29.11.2013

  21. New risks, new challenges, new responds, “no return” points: Russia (1) • Transit risks: • Post-2006/2009 – both materialized & perceived risks, • Materialized: not sanctioned off-take of gas in transit (at least 2 episodes – Jan’2006 & Jan’2009) => but: it is RUS supplier who is responsible for gas delivery to EU delivery point => risk of legal claims of EU customer against RUS supplier in case of non-delivery / violation of contract => EU customers has not raised such claims in Jan’2006 / Jan’2009 cases, but what about the future if repeated? • Perceived (to materialize in near future – result of UA accession to Energy Community Treaty): • MTPA vs transit flows (risk of contractual mismatch) • Forthcoming unbundling of NaftogasUA => risk of factual unilateral change (disappearance) of one Contracting Party A.Konoplyanik, ENERGETIKA-XXI, SPB, 29.11.2013

More Related