1 / 22

Erik Forsberg Joint Research Center of Photonics

The electron waveguide Y-branch switch A review and arguments for its use as a base for reversible logic. Erik Forsberg Joint Research Center of Photonics of the Royal Institute of Technology and Zhejiang University Hangzhou 310027, P. R. China 中国杭州浙江大学玉泉校区 erikf @zju.edu.cn. Outline.

shalin
Download Presentation

Erik Forsberg Joint Research Center of Photonics

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The electron waveguide Y-branch switchA review and arguments for its use as a base for reversible logic Erik Forsberg Joint Research Center of Photonics of the Royal Institute of Technology and Zhejiang University Hangzhou 310027, P. R. China 中国杭州浙江大学玉泉校区 erikf@zju.edu.cn

  2. Outline • Basic idea • Theoretical • Required switching voltage • Single mode operation • Ballistic switching • Experimental • Logic • Reversible logic • Conclusions

  3. 3 2 e- 1 Electron Waveguide Y-Branch Switch (YBS)T. Palm and L. Thylén, Appl. Phys. Lett. 60, 237 (1992) Single mode coherent mode of operation: Envelope of electron wavefunction propagates to either drain depending on the direction of electric field across the branching region. Required switching voltage: • no thermal limit  promises extreme low-power consumption • waveguide device  small is good • monotonic response  tolerant to fabrication inaccuracies • economics … ?

  4. Required switching voltageT. Palm, L. Thylen, O. Nilsson, C. Svensson, J. Appl. Phys. 74, 687 (1993) Required change in applied gate bias required to change the state of the YBS: • Example (GaAs): • Sheet carrier concentration 4x1015 m-2 • Interaction length 200 nm •  Theoretically required switch voltage 1 mV Contrast: Sub-thermal switching in YBS just experimentally verified ! L. Worschech et. al., private communication

  5. 1 0 -10 0 10 Gate bias [arb. units] Electron transport – Landauer-Büttiker formalism Transmission probability stem  right arm

  6. 3 2 e- 1 Space-charge effectsswitching The Self-Gating EffectJ-O J. Wesström Phys. Rev. Lett. 82 2564 (1999)

  7. Space charge cont’d...E. Forsberg, J. Appl. Phys, 93, 5687 (2003)E. Forsberg and J.-O. J. Wesström, Solid-State. Electron.48, 1147-1154 (2004). Fully self-consistent simulation tool for simulations of electron waveguide devices developed. • Space-charge can be dominant. • Dependence is complex. • Single parameter model not adequate to model space charge effects • Screening of gatevoltagecan be severe. • Conclusions: • Small charge densities allows for original response • Gate efficiency is a showstopper

  8. Set Detecting selfgatingK. Hieke and M. Ulfward, Phys. Rev. B 62, 16727 (2000).L. Worschech et. al., Appl. Phys. Lett. 79, 3287 (2001). Leave stem, W1, floating and measure it’s potential while varying branch voltages Theory then predicts: Expected result Experimental result

  9. Ballistic switching modeH. Q. Xu, Appl. Phys. Lett. 78, 2064 (2001). Three star coupled QPCs

  10. Recap YBS has three modes of operation • Single mode transport • No thermal limit to switch voltage • Self-gating operation • Switching based on space charge effects • Bi-stable mode of operation • (single mode operation) • Ballistic switching • Multimode mode of operation • Room temperature operation demonstrated

  11. Fabrication: Split-gateP. Ramvall, P. Omling, T. Palm, and L. Thylen, "Quantum Confinement: Physics and Application" (Eds. M. Cahay et. al.) (The Electrochemical Society, Inc., 1994). • Simple fabrication technique However… • Confinement too weak

  12. Fabrication:In-plane gatesJ. O. Wesström et. al., "Quantum IV: Nanoscale Materials, Devices and Sytems" (Eds. M. Cahay et. al.) (The Electrochemical Society, Inc., 1997).L. Worschech et. al., Appl. Phys. Lett. 78, 3325 (2001).L. Worschech et. al., Physica E 12, 688 (2002).G. M. Jones et. al., Appl. Phys. Lett. 86, 073117 (2005). • Simple fabrication technique • Strong confinement  single mode easily achieved • Demonstrated in • GaAs/AlGaAs • InGaAs/InP • InAs/AlSb • However… • Low gate efficiency

  13. Fabrication: Schottky gatesE. Forsberg and K. Hieke, Phys. Scri. T101, 158 (2002). • Strong confinement  single mode easily achieved • Demonstrated in • GaAs/AlGaAs • Better gate efficiency possible However… • Complex fabrication technique

  14. YBS-based circuits • Fan-out possible • Tolerant to fabrication defects • Monotonic response • Coherence only required in branching region

  15. G D 1 S D 2 S G D1 D2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 Logic Based on Y-branch Switches T. Palm and L. Thylén, J. Appl. Phys. 79 8076 (1996) E. Forsberg, unpublished Electrical symbol and possible states Inverter NAND gate using asymmetrical Y-branch switches

  16. Ballistic YBS logic S. Reitzenstein et. al., Electron. Lett. 38, 951 (2002) H. Q. Xu, IEEE Electron. Dev. Lett 25, 164 (2004).

  17. YBS logic • Single mode operation logic • Feasible • Low power operation due to sub-thermal switching • Advantage over CMOS FET ? • Ballistic • Demonstrated @ room temperature • Thermally limited • Advantage of CMOS FET ? • Feasible application: easy integration with III-V semiconductor lasers/modulators • Conclusion: • For conventional logic it is highly questionable if the YBS can ever outperform CMOS FETs in an economically competitive manner. • Other ideas?

  18. Comparing numbers Switchenergy for a device with capacitive inputs: ΔVswitch = 1 mV C = 0.1 pF Minimum switch energy for typical YBS is thus of the order0.6 meV. kBT ln 2 = 18 meV @ room temperature. Conclusion: Reversible logic can greatly reduce the power dissipation of YBS-based logic.

  19. Reversible YBS logicE. Forsberg, Nanotechnology 15, 298 (2004). ccNOT (Fredkin) gate

  20. Implementation • Possible today III-V’s • However, present fabrication techniques limited • Cryogenic operation required • Low gating efficiency • Power dissipation due to information erasure not dominant • Other possibilities • Hexogonal networks – feasible • Carbon nanotubes – possible • Si nanowires – ? A. N. Andriotis et. al., Appl. Phys. Lett. 79, 266 (2001).

  21. Moving periodic globalpotential V x Left branch y Data waveguide Ground-state high- probability regions of two electrons’ wave packets x Electrostatic repulsion BasicY-junction“switch gate” Control waveguide Rightbranch TimingM. Frank et. al., private communication

  22. Summary • YBS summarized • Recap on theoretical work • Summary of experimental work • Conventional logic based on YBS • Reversible logic based on YBS • The road ahead • Clocking schemes etc • Feasible designs • Fabrication issues • Gating efficiency potential showstopperinvariant of implementation technology

More Related