1 / 12

2007 ISM Workshop

2007 ISM Workshop. Session E-1 Panel Discussion on Best Practices and Lessons Learned Frank McCoy/Bill Webb. Corporate ISM Readiness Reviews Conducted. Idaho National Lab (INL) – Phases I & II Idaho Cleanup Project (ICP) – Phases I & II River Corridor Closure (RCC) – Phase II.

shayna
Download Presentation

2007 ISM Workshop

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. 2007 ISM Workshop Session E-1 Panel Discussion on Best Practices and Lessons Learned Frank McCoy/Bill Webb

  2. Corporate ISM Readiness Reviews Conducted • Idaho National Lab (INL) – Phases I & II • Idaho Cleanup Project (ICP) – Phases I & II • River Corridor Closure (RCC) – Phase II

  3. Independent Feedback • Critical Input to WCH’s Declaration of Readiness • Key Factor • Team members not responsible for areas they review

  4. Balanced Feedback • RCC Knowledge Base • Covered 3 Projects & all Functional Areas in a short period of time • Knowledge Base from outside RCC • Facilities best practice sharing • IH Database to SRS • RadCon practice adopted at RCC from SRS

  5. Constructive Feedback • Graded Approach applied • i.e., Bldgs. 324/327 vs. ERDF • Emphasis on Observation-Based vs. Compliance-Based • Help maximize the Contractor’s efforts • Result – Proper perspective & constructive feedback

  6. Timely Feedback • Real time feedback on significant issues • Daily briefs with Senior Management • Comprehensive debrief at close-out • Form-1’s drafted by close-out • Factual Accuracy Copy within one week • Final Report within two weeks

  7. Continuity with Feedback • Input to corrective action development • Provided feedback in determining short-term & long-term actions • Oversight of final corrective action process • Verify issues are understood • Verify issues are properly communicated • Verify CA effectiveness • Verification of readiness criteria • Especially for CAs that cut across Projects and Functional Areas • Added resource for staff to draw on

  8. Strategic Feedback • Combined WGI & CH2MHill team • Shared expertise & experience • The more we work together the better we work together

  9. RCC Review Results • 9 Strengths • Emergence of positive safety culture • ERDF issue management process • Workers response to upset conditions • IWCP • Field Remediation (FR) integrated operations • Safety Representative’s field involvement • IH database • Environmental assessments • SQEP process for validating competency

  10. RCC Review Results • 6 Issues • RadCon practice counter to ConOps • Work released prior to JHA approval • Work control feedback LTA • Electrical safety indeterminate from troubleshooting work package • Lack of quality closure documentation for D-56 NOV • Implementation of safety basis commitments is not rigorous • 22 Opportunities for Improvement (OFI)

  11. Conclusion/Recommendations • Pick team that is qualified & independent & one that is balanced with site/project knowledge • Design approach methodology that is graded & observation weighted & fine tune as you go • Ensure team is aware of recent history (how the Site/Project has gotten to where they are & how much progress is expected

  12. Recommendations Cont’d • Build peer review & management review into the assessment process • No Surprises • Provide Continuity, if possible • Build teamwork • Practice ISM • Constructive FEEDBACK – Safe Workplaces

More Related