1 / 6

SCIENCE: DOES IT MATTER?

SCIENCE: DOES IT MATTER?. Prof. Dr.Pieter J.D.Drenth, President All European Academies (ALLEA). Budapest Science Forum 2003 8-10 Nov. 2003. Science matters. Many present-day official statements stress the importance of science for our economic and social future, i.o.w.:

shiri
Download Presentation

SCIENCE: DOES IT MATTER?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. SCIENCE: DOES IT MATTER? Prof. Dr.Pieter J.D.Drenth, President All European Academies (ALLEA). Budapest Science Forum 2003 8-10 Nov. 2003.

  2. Science matters • Many present-day official statements stress the importance of science for our economic and social future, i.o.w.: • Stress the revelance of science

  3. What is relevance of science? * Relevance of science is a multidimensional concept, referring to diverging goals and concepts. * Four types of relevance are proposed: • intrinsic relevance: augmentation of body of knowledge, and educational function • Instrumental relevance: practical tools and instruments • Innovative relevance: new knowledge leading to innovative applications • Contributive relevance: support for decision-making or policy development

  4. Different types of knowledge * Scientists should not become decision-makers; different roles and responsibilities * Two types of knowledge should be distinguished: (1) Solid knowledge which only needs political translation for use in policy decisions (2) Incomplete, probabilistic and uncertain knowledge, direct extrapolations of which are full of risks * Precondition for usefulness of all types of scientific knowledge: its independent nature.

  5. Reasons for non-use of science - Research results are contra-intuitive or contradict stereotypes - Research repeatedly produces contradictory results - No or insufficient knowledge available - Science does not answer policy maker’s real questions - Lack of willingness to accept research results - Decision-making is more than pure application of facts and knowledge

  6. Moral responsibility * Scientists are led by scientific criteria; veracity is their main touchstone; freedom and independence are important conditions * This does not preclude moral and social responsibility: choice of research subjects, conducting of experiments, application * Science should take concern and apprehension of the public seriously * Balance between freedom and responsibility: freedom in constraint

More Related