320 likes | 1.12k Views
Chapter 2-Fleck . Types of Strength Training. Introduction. Fitness vs. performance Strength across ROM and velocities What does training accomplish? H ow fast is it accomplished? Comparison to other types? What types of humans? Trained vs. untrained?. Fitness vs. Performance.
E N D
Chapter 2-Fleck Types of Strength Training
Introduction • Fitness vs. performance • Strength across ROM and velocities • What does training accomplish? • How fast is it accomplished? • Comparison to other types? • What types of humans? • Trained vs. untrained?
Introduction cont… • Factors • Volume • Intensity • Outcomes of different types • Concentric vs. eccentric • Isotonic (DCER), isometric, isokinetic, variable (cams)
Isometric • No movement • Gains are for static strength but quick • Submax also results in gains • Time x intensity • Longer time per rep is advisable • Rule of 10’s • Valsalva • 3-5 frequency • Hypertrophy related to program design
Isometric cont… • Joint angle specificity carryover 5-25 degs • Static not dynamic adaptations • Motor performance is dynamic • Very little velocity change • Sticking point training
Isotonic (DCER) • Muscle force varies but weight does not • Dynamic Constant External Resistance • Optimum design? Truth? • Berger 3x6 • DeLorme and Watkins 3x10 • O’Shea 5x3, 3x7, 2-3x7-12 • Fitness vs. strength and performance • Dose response?
Isotonic (DCER) cont… • Max lifts in design • Muscle activation? • Frequency inverse to intensity • Muscle group specificity • Training age specificity • Periodization allows change • Motor performance dynamic gains! • Multiple muscles trained • Increase of 10% to 150%?
Variable Resistance • Lever arms, cams or pulleys • Strength curve changes • Nautilus • Curves are individual • Design is similar to DCER • Increases are similar • Motor performance is less
Isokinetic • Constant velocity (load range) • Less specificity • Concentric and eccentric • Velocity spectrum (0-500 d/s) • Strength changes are similar to other types • Design is similar to other types • Velocity specificity • Velocity carryover (180 d/s)? • Rehab and lab tool
Eccentric Training • Lengthening actions • 120% of concentric • Important component • Specificity • DOMS • Carryover to concentric limited • Less ATP and EMG • Injury relationship
Comparisons • Most beneficial? • Equate volume or intensity • Kelly work (con vs. ecc) • Isometric limited carryover • Isokinetic greater than isometric motor • Eccentric greater for dynamic than isometric • Free weights greater motor carryover • Concentric greatest overall carryover
Summary • Specificity • Velocity • Muscle action • Direction • Muscle group • Angle • Optimal design • Frequency • Volume • Intensity
Next Class • Chapter 3 Fleck