1 / 10

Assistant Meeting

Assistant Meeting. December 11, 2006. Agenda. Who wants to count the votes? Ah! you both in the corners, thanks! Who wants to write the protocol? You, in the first row, on my left! Cool  Nomination of representatives DK – Departements conference UK – Teaching commission. Agenda.

sigourney-buckley
Download Presentation

Assistant Meeting

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Assistant Meeting December 11, 2006

  2. Agenda • Who wants to count the votes? • Ah! you both in the corners, thanks! • Who wants to write the protocol? • You, in the first row, on my left! Cool • Nomination of representatives • DK – Departements conference • UK – Teaching commission

  3. Agenda • Information about DA (Riko Jacob) • Assistant association (VMI) • Information on VMI and current situation • “Nomination” of “president” and “cashier” • Bachelor revision • Information on what’s going on • Collection of input for UK • Varia

  4. Nomination of representatives • DK • Michael Waschbuesch • Bernd • Pedro Gonnet • Ruedi Arnold • Riko Jacob • Werner Dietl • Hermann Lehner (per definition) • Susi

  5. Nomination of representatives • UK • Pedro Gonnet • Ruedi Arnold • Giovanni Serafini • Joseph R. • Florian Schneider

  6. Information about DA Riko, your turn 

  7. Assistant Association • Who is going to be allowed to touch the money? • Alex de Spindler • Dario Martin Nordio • Next steps…

  8. Bachelor revision - background • Bachelor program is believed to be “sub-optimal” • Too much content in too may different topics • Lack of practice • Too strict regulations (obligatory courses…) • Not feasible within 3 years for most students.

  9. Bachelor revision – Your input Lack of practice – We want more cheap slaves The students lack of experience Testate Less Analysis/Linalg, more CS-Math (logical thinking….) Students can’t program after first year. Syllabi versus actual course program. New: Midterm, Homework that counts… -> more work for us, but students are more interested -> “Buhmann Argument” Assistant Pool. (What is counted) (your input goes here)

  10. Varia

More Related