140 likes | 224 Views
Gender, Electoral Turnout and Abstention in Europe. Susan Banducci, University of Exeter Yvonne Galligan, Queen’s University Belfast Bernadette C. Hayes, University of Aberdeen. Focus. European Parliament post-election survey, 2004 Gender differences in electoral turnout
E N D
Gender, Electoral Turnout and Abstention in Europe Susan Banducci, University of Exeter Yvonne Galligan, Queen’s University Belfast Bernadette C. Hayes, University of Aberdeen
Focus • European Parliament post-election survey, 2004 • Gender differences in electoral turnout • Gender differences in timing of decision to vote • Do men and women differ in terms of their electoral turnout? • Are women more likely than men to delay their electoral decision-making?
Main Findings: Electoral Turnout • Men and women do not significantly differ in terms of their voting behaviour • Around equal numbers of men and women turned out to vote across the various nations • Key finding is the increasing rates of abstention by both men and women both within and across the various nations
European Election Turnout – Gender differences have disappeared Source: Eurobarometer, European Election Study 1999 & EP Post Election Survey 2004
ELECTORAL ABSTENTION • The decision to vote or not to vote came later for women than for men • Reasons for electoral abstention – circumstantial (absence from home, illness or disability, pressure of work, registration problems) versus voluntary (uninterested, distrustful of politics, critical of the European Union)
Voluntary or Circumstantial Abstention: Gender differences • Among men who did not vote, 33% give circumstantial reasons (50% voluntary) • Among women who did not vote, 38% give circumstantial reasons (45% voluntary)
Main Findings: Reasons for Electoral Abstention • Voluntary reasons are primary factor in accounting for European abstention although women were somewhat less likely to offer this explanation than men • Women somewhat more likely to cite circumstantial reasons which they were more likely to attribute to personal and family-related matters than were men
Main Findings: Gender Differences in the Impact of Political Orientations on Electoral Abstention • Main orientations of electoral abstainers indicated a distrust of politicians and a lack of interest in politics • Women abstainers were notably more likely to be uninterested in politics than male abstainers
Women Candidates and Political Engagement • More women candidates, higher levels of interest among women • More women candidates, women more likely to vote • Countries with quotas (party, nat’l) had 8% more women candidates (36% compared to 28%) • On average, women had an 8% increase in the probability of voting in countries with quotas
Quotas: MEP Survey • 45% of women MEPs (compared to 25% male MEPs) feel that European-wide quotas for women should be adopted • Source: David Farrell, Simon Hix, Mark Johnson and Roger Scully (2006) 'EPRG 2000 and 2006 MEP Surveys Dataset', http://www.lse.ac.uk/collections/EPRG/
Should there be candidate gender quotas for EP elections? Source: Farrell et al (2006)
European Wide Lists: MEP Survey • Most MEPs disagree with European-wide lists (58%) • However, 40%+ of women MEPs feel that 10% or more MEPs should be elected from European-wide lists
Policy Implications • Efficient voting registration practices • Alternative ways of accessing the ballot • Address information deficit, particularly evident among women non-voters • 50:50 gender balanced party lists • European lists for proportion of EP seats, with mandatory 50:50 gender balance