510 likes | 530 Views
This event showcases leading research in quantitative reservoir modeling, emphasizing data integration and uncertainty assessment. Explore topics like modeling geological heterogeneity, uncertainty, and 3D/4D models incorporating vast data sets. Discover seismic reservoir characterization, statistical rock physics, and seismic data interpretation. Engage with SCRF professors, staff, and students, advancing collaboration with various research groups. Benefit from research reports, theses, and software access with SCRF membership. Unveil research insights such as Distance Kernel Methods, Multidimensional Scaling, and Uncertain Geologic Scenario Modeling. Witness groundbreaking projects like Joint Inversion of Production and Time-lapse Seismic Data. Connect with SCRF's affiliate members and their long-term research goals. Join this research-focused annual meeting to delve into the cutting-edge of reservoir forecasting.
E N D
Annual Meeting 2013 Stanford Center for Reservoir Forecasting SCRF 26th Annual Meeting May 8-9 2013
SCRF 26th Annual Meeting • SCRF Overview • 2013 Research Highlights
SCRF Overview SCRF Mission Leading research in quantitative reservoir modeling with a focus on data integration and assessing uncertainty
SCRF: Overview • Quantitative modeling of geological heterogeneity • Modeling uncertainty • Building 3D/4D models accounting for scale and accuracy of geological, geophysical and reservoir engineering data
SCRF: Research topics • Modeling uncertainty • Modeling integrated uncertainty in metric space • Distance-Kernel Method • Quantifying geological scenario uncertainty • Multiple-point geostatistics • Stochastic simulation of (geo)patterns • Design of fast and robust geostatistical algorithms • Application to actual reservoirs, carbonate and clastic • Hybridization with surface and object-based methods
SCRF: Research topics • Seismic reservoir characterization • Statistical Rock physics • Interpretation of facies from seismic data • Dealing with sub-seismic scale • Integrating different types of geophysical data • Seismic constraints for Basin Modeling • Time-lapse seismic and history matching • Geologically consistent HM • Workflows for integrating 4D seismic • Streamline-based HM • Value of Information • Decision driven modeling of uncertainty
SCRF: Students, Staff, and Faculty Graduate students (~17) Post-docs Andre Jung, Pejman Tahmasebi Research Staff Celine Scheidt Staff Thuy Nguyen, Joleen Castro Faculty Jef Caers Tapan Mukerji Alexandre Boucher Work closely with other research groups in the School of Earth Sciences
SCRF: Stanford Collaborations • SRB • Rock Physics • SUPRI/Smart Fields • Flow simulation • SEP • Seismic Imaging • SPODDS • Deep Water Systems • BPSM • Basin Modeling
SCRF: Affiliate Members Long-term research goals are made possible through continuous funding of most major oil, service and software companies ~20 affiliate members
SCRF: Membership Benefits • Graduates • Facilitated access to research • Reports • Theses • Software • Annual Meeting • Visits • Research collaborations
SCRF 26th Annual Meeting 2013 Research and Results: Highlights
1. Modeling Uncertainty
1. Modeling Uncertainty • Distance Kernel Methods • Generalized Sensitivity Analysis (D-GSA)
1. Multidimensional Scaling (MDS) Caers et al., 2009 Map a set of N earth models using a pair wise distance between them.
1. Distance based sensitivity analysis Fenwick, Scheidt, Caers
1. Distance based sensitivity analysis - applications - reservoir modeling - basin and petroleum system modeling - seismic interpretation - 4-D seismic
1. Distance based sensitivity analysis Addy Satija Not sensitive parameters Fix to what value?
1. Distance based modeling of uncertain geologic scenarios O Scenario 1 OScenario 2 P( geologic scenario | data) Updating geologic scenario * data 18
1. Andre Jung Distance based scenario analysis for fractured reservoirs Spatial patterns of dual porosity effective properties
1. Orhun Aydin, Celine Scheidt Distance Based Modeling of Uncertainty Distance between shapes and patterns
1. Lewis Li, Jef Caers Modeling Uncertainty A possible alternative to probability?
2. Multiple Point Pattern Simulation Algorithms
2. MS-CCSIM Pejman Tahmasebi Multi-scale cross-correlation simulation
3. Integrating Geophysical Data 24
3. Core Well logs Seismic data • Data Integration
3. Integrating geophysical data Quantitative seismic interpretation Seismic inversion for facies and fluids 26
3. Spatial model Perturb the initial model Seismic inversion for litho-fluid facies Simultaneous or single-loop approach 27
3. Iterative Adaptive Spatial Resampling Applied to Seismic Inversion for facies Cheolkyun Jeong Gregoire Mariethoz 28
3. Iterative Spatial Resampling (ISR) Markov chain Monte Carlo (McMC): perturbs realizations of a spatially dependent variable while preserving its spatial structure. Gregoire Mariethoz et al.
3. Cheolkyun Jeong Adaptive spatial resampling in 3D well Reference Posterior sample Seismic impedance
3. Seismic time-lapse inversion Dario Grana Changes in fluid saturations and pressure Time-lapse seismic difference Near, mid and far angle 31
3. Seismic History Matching Production data Time-lapse seismic data 32
3. Integration of production and time lapse seismic data: Norne field Amit Suman
3. Southern part of Norwegian sea Norne Field Segment E
3. • Well logs • Horizons • Well data • - Oil , gas and water flow rate • - BHP (Bottom hole pressure) • Time-lapse seismic data
3. Predicted flow and seismic response Observed flow and seismic response Joint Inversion Loop Model Reservoir
3. What are the sensitive parameters in joint time-lapse and production inversion loop? • Flow response • Seismic response
3. AmitSuman, Ph.D. dissertation JOINT INVERSION OF PRODUCTION AND TIME-LAPSE SEISMIC DATA: APPLICATION TO NORNE FIELD
3. Jaehoon Lee Integrating seismic and electromagnetic time-lapse data Well-Log scale Field scale Scaling distributions
4. Hybrid Geomodeling
4. Hybrid Geomodeling • Surface based models • Generalized cellular automata • Quantitative geologic models
4. Bertoncello et al. Two points Multiple points Geological realism Object based Surface based Process based Conditioning capabilities
4. Prof. Chris Paola St. Anthony Falls Lab (UMN) Tank Experiment
Statistical Similarity between Stacking Patterns: Linking Tank Experiments to Field Scale Extract morphometrics From tank data 4. Siyao Xu 44
4. Modeling channelized systems Yinan Wang Generalized cellular model Topography Avulsion
5. Software
5. Alex Boucher Lewis Li • C++ toolkit for Multiple Point Simulation • SGEMS-UQ • SGEMS plug-in • efficient workflow for performing distance-based uncertainty quantification code and tutorial example available from http://github.com/SCRFpublic/SGEMS-UQ.
2013 Research Highlights • Modeling Uncertainty • -Distance-based generalized sensitivity analysis • -Scenario uncertainty and updating • Multiple-point pattern simulation • -MS-CCSIM • Integrating geophysical data • -Seismic reservoir characterization • -Time-lapse data • Hybrid geomodeling • Tank experiment analysis • Modeling channelized systems • Software – SGEMS-UQ
Guest Speaker Professor Roussos Dimitrakopoulos
Research Report Digital annual report with papers Ph.D. Theses Presentations: http://scrf.stanford.edu