1 / 6

Shelter Cluster Palestine Building cluster capacity for assessments

This project aims to improve assessment capabilities within the Palestinian shelter sector through qualitative and quantitative data collection, lessons learned exercises, and stakeholder engagement. By gathering, validating, and analyzing data, the project seeks to enhance future response strategies and address identified needs effectively.

swinson
Download Presentation

Shelter Cluster Palestine Building cluster capacity for assessments

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Shelter Cluster PalestineBuilding cluster capacity for assessments Shelter Cluster Coordination Workshop, Geneva, 2nd October 2017

  2. Rationale: • $236m recorded on FTS between 2014-2016 • $626.5m recorded on norg.report • - $9m initial emergency response/winterization; $6m T-shelter/caravans; $<90m cash for rent; $207m repairs; $335m reconstruction • Two-phased approach with support of REACH: • Phase I: Qualitative Lessons Learned exercise • To gather and collate collective knowledge, experiences and best practices • Phase II: Quantitative Data collection • To test/validate qualitative data and gain statistically significant data on key achievements and residual needs •  Overall recommendations for future response Gaza Shelter Response Evaluation

  3. July - September 2016: • ‘Lessons Learned’ exercise to capture sector knowledge • Secondary data review • Lessons Learned workshop • Online survey • Purposively sampled semi-structured KIIs • Reflections: • External REACH facilitator with good knowledge of context • Focus on humanitarian (emergency response, temporary assistance and durable repairs) clarified cluster scope • Results: • Need for better prioritization and targeting of assistance • Need for agreed minimum shelter standard • Need for quantitative data verification of findings Phase 1: Qualitative participative evaluation

  4. October – December 2016: • Household survey of 1,037 households (vs 1,195) • Sampled per damage category • 95% confidence +/- 5.64% • 25 teams, 14 days, budget $30,000 incl partner contributions • Reflections: • Keep ToR/objectives in mind • Be clear on roles/responsibilities • Clarity in questions: • Damage asst data vs beneficiary perception • Lack of distinction in cash assistance • Results: • Presented to donors to highlight recommendations for future response and outstanding needs • MPWH revised shelter assistance policy (discussions ongoing) Phase 2: Quantitative data collection

  5. Minimum standards TWG: • Support from GSC Technical Surge Coordinator • 30 criteria agreed by SC partners • Coordination and buy-in from MPWH • Housing conditions survey: • 2012 report by NRC – no quantitative information • Representative sample from two sources • MCIT population registration • MoSA hardship cases • 95% confidence +/- 4.56% • 20 teams, 10 days, budget $13,000 (+ in kind) Minimum standards housing conditions survey

  6. REACH evaluation: • Buy in from cluster members on outcome level/better monitoring • Set agenda for cluster workplan/TWGs • Influence on MPWH policy and CB on IM • Housing conditions survey: • Experience used to inform cluster-led survey • Shelter standard in MIC, coord with MPWH/MoSA • Data used for HNO PiN • Definition of IDP? • Now in process of data analysis •  Capacity building for IM/report writing Building cluster capacity for assessments

More Related