1 / 56

Anticipating Cloud-to-Ground (CG) Lightning Utilizing Reflectivity Data from the WSR-88D.

Anticipating Cloud-to-Ground (CG) Lightning Utilizing Reflectivity Data from the WSR-88D. Pete Wolf, SOO National Weather Service Jacksonville, Florida. Image from NOAA. Should We Do More?. CG lightning as weather-related killer…2 nd to floods.

tab
Download Presentation

Anticipating Cloud-to-Ground (CG) Lightning Utilizing Reflectivity Data from the WSR-88D.

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Anticipating Cloud-to-Ground (CG) Lightning Utilizing Reflectivity Data from the WSR-88D. Pete Wolf, SOO National Weather Service Jacksonville, Florida Image from NOAA

  2. Should We Do More? • CG lightning as weather-related killer…2nd to floods. • CG lightning among leading weather-related causes of property damage, and most frequent damage claim. • $2 billion+ annually in U.S. alone. • Lightning is the most frequent threat to life/property. • Our current effort is primarily focused on public awareness. • 30/30 rule, “Take Cover if you Hear Thunder”, Lightning Awareness Week, etc. • In real-time, we do more to alert people of penny-sized hail than CG lightning. • More is not done due to belief that all t-storms produce deadly lightning.

  3. Is CG Lightning Predictable (or at least “Nowcast”-able) • A study on CG lightning initiation radar clues at the Kennedy Space Center (KSC) determined that skill in anticipating CG lightning was achievable. • The study involved about 40 thunderstorms around the KSC area. • Results showed the best correlation when the 40dBZ core reached at least the -10C height…yielding a POD around 0.85, an average lead time of 7.5 minutes, and a low FAR.

  4. WFO Jacksonville FL Study • A more ambitious study was completed in 2005, involving 420+ convective cells across northern FL, southern GA and other areas of the southern U.S. The study included a mix of single cell, multi-cell, and supercell events occurring during various times of the year (a few cases were in prior years). • Nearly 320 cells for CG initiation study, 109 not producing CG lightning. • Additional 109 cells producing numerous CG strikes after initially producing isolated/scattered strikes • The study compared storms producing… • No CG strikes (that had 40dBZ core up to at least 10 Kft, with an echo top up to at least 22 Kft) • Isolated/Scattered strikes (defined as 1-10 CG strikes per 5-minute period) • Numerous/Excessive strikes (defined as > 10 CG strikes per 5-minute period)

  5. WFO Jacksonville FL Study • KSC Study: • Used Environ. -10C level • Used 40 dBZ echo height • JAX Study • Used “Updraft” -10C level • Used 40 dBZ echo height Updr -10C Envir -10C

  6. WFO Jacksonville Findings • Due to a number of issues, a probabilistic approach to the results was taken. • Radar issues (e.g. interpolation, calibration, etc). • NLDN output accuracy issues. • Specific values issue (is there a difference between 40 dBZ and 38 dBZ or 42 dBZ?)

  7. WFO Jacksonville Findings The results suggested skill in producing probabilistic guidance based on the 40 dBZ echo height… PROBABILITY OF: No CG CG Nmrs CG Lgtng Lgtng Strikes 40dBZ height < -10C level – 8 kft 100% 0% 0% 40dBZ height = -10C level – 5 to 7 kft 87% 13% 0% 40dBZ height = -10C level – 2 to 4 kft (~ -6/-7C level) 67% 33% 0% 40dBZ height = -10C level +/- 1 kft (apprch/exceed -10C) 23% 77% 0% 40dBZ height = -10C level + 2 to 4 kft 22% 78% 0% 40dBZ height = -10C level + 5 to 7 kft 0% 100% 18% 40dBZ height = -10C level + 8 to 10 kft 5% 95% 41% 40dBZ height > -10C level + 11 to 14 kft 1% 99% 75% 40dBZ height > -10C level + > 14 kft 0% 100% 92% (51%) Note skill in predicting CG strikes when 40dBZ height reaches -10C height in updraft. Note skill in predicting numerous CG strikes when 40 dBZ height > -10C height + 10kft. Note CG lightning is unlikely when the 40dBZ height is no higher than -10C level - 5kft The probability patterns above suggest probabilistic guidance can be generated for CG lightning.

  8. WFO Jacksonville Findings…Update Updated results through mid 2006, incorporating a total of 835+ convective cells: PROBABILITY OF: No CG CG Nmrs CG Lgtng Lgtng Strikes 40dBZ height < -10C level – 8 kft 100% 0% 0% 40dBZ height = -10C level – 5 to 7 kft 92% 8% 0% 40dBZ height = -10C level – 2 to 4 kft (~ -6/-7C level) 79% 21% 0% 40dBZ height = -10C level +/- 1 kft (apprch/exceed -10C) 39% 61% 0% 40dBZ height = -10C level + 2 to 4 kft 16% 84% 0% 40dBZ height = -10C level + 5 to 7 kft 1% 99% 11% 40dBZ height = -10C level + 8 to 10 kft 2% 98% 35% 40dBZ height > -10C level + 11 to 14 kft 2% 98% 45% 40dBZ height > -10C level + > 14 kft 0% 100% 92% (57%) Note skill in predicting CG strikes when 40dBZ height reaches -10C height in updraft. Note skill in predicting numerous CG strikes when 40 dBZ height > -10C height + 10kft. Note CG lightning is unlikely when the 40dBZ height is no higher than -10C level - 5kft The probability patterns change little, again suggesting probabilistic guidance can be generated for CG lightning.

  9. Failure Areas • This concept does not work well for: • Lengthy anvils, that may not have 40dBZ echo, yet can yield “bolts from the blue”. • Widespread MCS stratiform regions. • It is possible to relate these failures to a sufficiently high 40dBZ core within the upstream (storm-relative) updraft region. • Manual intervention needed to account for these failure areas.

  10. CASE EXAMPLES • Let’s take a look at a few cases, to demonstrate what the results suggest…an ability to anticipate occurrence and amount of CG lightning, based on WSR-88D reflectivity data. • April 22, 2005: Supercell/bow echo case • June 27, 2005: Pulse storm case • The following are 5-min CG lightning displays (from NLDN), with CG lightning probabilities overlaid (numerous strike…>10 per 5 min…probabilities in parentheses). • Very High Probability…90%+ (80%+) • High Probability…60-85% (50-75%) • Moderate Probability…30-50% (25-45%) • Low Probability…5-25% (5-20%)

  11. PROBABILITIES USED IN EXAMPLES 40dBZ height relative Prob of CG lightning Prob of numerous strikes to updraft -10C level (1+ per 5 min period) (> 10 per 5 min period) -8+ kft -7 kft 5% -6 kft 10% -5 kft 15% -4 kft 20% -3 kft 30% -2 kft 40% -1 kft 50% 0 kft 60% +1 kft 70% +2 kft 75% +3 kft 80% +4 kft 85% 5% +5 kft 90% 10% +6 kft 95% 15% +7 kft 95% 20% +8 kft 95% 25% +9 kft 95% 30% +10 kft 99% 40% +11 kft 99% 50% +12 kft 99% 60% +13 kft 99% 70% +14 kft 99% 80% > +14 kft 99% 90%

  12. 1640z March 22, 2005 Part I

  13. 1645z 1645z

  14. 1655z 1655

  15. 1700z 1700z

  16. 1705z 1705z

  17. 1710z 1710z

  18. 1715z 1715z

  19. 1725z 1725z

  20. 1730z

  21. 1735z

  22. 1745z

  23. 1750z

  24. 1755z

  25. 1800z

  26. 1805z

  27. 1810z

  28. 1815z P A U S E

  29. 2045z March 22, 2005 Part II (2 ½ hrs later)

  30. 2050z

  31. 2055z

  32. 2100z

  33. 2105z

  34. 2110z

  35. 2115z

  36. 2120z

  37. 2125z

  38. 2130z

  39. 99(90) 2135z

  40. 2140z

  41. 2145z P A U S E

  42. 1725z June 27, 2005

  43. 1730z

  44. 1735z

  45. 1740z

  46. 1745z

  47. 1750z

  48. 1755z

  49. 1800z

  50. 1805z

More Related