150 likes | 162 Views
Summary of the NSF Chief Information Officer Advisory Committee's Spring 2006 meeting discussing Grants.gov and the Government-wide Grants Management initiative. The update includes the history, status, and prospects of Grants.gov and its integration with NSF's FastLane system.
E N D
Grants Management Update George O. Strawn NSF Chief Information Officer Advisory Committee for Business and Operations Spring 2006 Meeting
Discussion Outline • Government-wide Grants Management (Grants.gov) • NSB Discussion on Grants.gov • Grants Management Line of Business (LoB) Update
NSB Discussion: Grants.gov • NSF Context • Grants.gov • Context • History • Status • Prospects
NSF Context (FastLane) • FastLane is NSF’s flagship application, enabling NSF to receive electronic proposals • NSF developed FastLane over a 5-year period (1995-2000), addressing challenges and enhancing the system based on lessons learned • Now a mature system, FastLane is well-accepted by the academic community
Grants.gov Context • One of many Federal e-Gov projects that seek to consolidate Federal Information Technology • e-Gov projects range from e-payroll (which has worked well at NSF) to e-travel (which has not) • Designed to serve as a “one-stop shop” for finding and applying for all federal grants • Like FastLane in the 90’s, Grants.gov is young
Grants.gov History • Accelerated time schedule • NSF is part of the Grants.gov team • Fastlane “lessons learned” experiences are shared and integrated into some (but not all) of the Grants.gov design and development
Grants.gov Status • Mac support is now under development • NSF is sharing other Grants.gov development issues with the development team • Continued integration of FastLane Lessons Learned
Grants.gov Prospects • Grants.gov will ultimately provide benefits and consistency to the academic community (e.g., Faculty and Sponsored Research Offices) • NSF will continue to support FastLane for the research community while Grants.gov is maturing
Issues to consider: Grants.gov • Communication and coordination within NSF and research community • Policy considerations relating to problematic submissions via Grants.gov • Future requirement to use Grants.gov for all submissions?
Government-wide Grants Management Goal • Consolidate grants management systems and services across the federal government Why • $540,000,000,000 in grants How • Grants.gov • Grants Management Line of Business (LoB)
Grants Management LoB Goal • Aimed at limiting the number of government-wide grants-related IT service providers for functions beyond “Find” and “Apply” NSF Approach • Develop enhancements and additions to the NSF suite that can be leveraged/modified to also serve external customers
FY06 Grants Management LoB • First round of consortium leads: • NSF • Department of HHS/ACFS • Department of Education • Second round of consortium leads anticipated to be named at a later date
FY06 Grants Management LoB • Complete a business case • Pilot activity with another agency • USDA Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension Service
Grants Management LoB Issues • Sponsorship and governance of a multi-year, strategic investment • Creation of information sharing culture • Next Generation capabilities requires Next Generation supporting infrastructure
Questions? National Science Foundation Office of the Chief Information Officer