1 / 7

GRI NW Transparency

GRI NW Transparency. Stockholm Stakeholder Group Conference 26 November 2009 Martin Crouch Partner: European Strategy. Progress update. Storage transparency Daily information on storage volume, inflows and outflows Go-live 1 October Completion 1 December 2009 Transmission transparency

teagan
Download Presentation

GRI NW Transparency

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. GRI NW Transparency Stockholm Stakeholder Group Conference 26 November 2009 Martin Crouch Partner: European Strategy

  2. Progress update • Storage transparency • Daily information on storage volume, inflows and outflows • Go-live 1 October • Completion 1 December 2009 • Transmission transparency • Phase one completed 9 June 2009 – wrap up • Next steps for 2010

  3. Storage transparency • Gas Storage Europe commitment for early implementation (3 months) • GRI NW regulators will monitor and report on progress • Example of daily update:

  4. Storage project - snapshot

  5. Transmission phase one: status GRTGaz published July - WINGAS published October 2009 (96% compliant)

  6. Transmission transparency next steps • Developments since phase 1: • New third package requirements • Network users’ “minimum transparency requirements” • Expectation of European Commission’s comitology proposals • Last Stakeholder group invited TSOs to bring forward proposals based on new requirements • GTE+ made proposals for pan-EU implementation • Debate has moved to EU level; comitology proposals welcome • Additional regional work must have clear value-added • Don’t see value debating interpretation of minimum requirements of third package • Door still open for more ambitious proposals from TSOs

More Related