1 / 20

Hungarian foresight experiences and their utilisation in Hungary’s science and technology policy

Hungarian foresight experiences and their utilisation in Hungary’s science and technology policy. Dr. Tamás Balogh Department for R&D Strategy Ministry of Education Budapest, Hungary tamas.balogh@om.hu. both at panel & macro. levels. Policy. recommendations.

teresa
Download Presentation

Hungarian foresight experiences and their utilisation in Hungary’s science and technology policy

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Hungarian foresight experiences and their utilisation in Hungary’s science and technology policy Dr. Tamás Balogh Department for R&D Strategy Ministry of Education Budapest, Hungary tamas.balogh@om.hu

  2. both at panel & macro levels Policy recommendations TEP = “Technológiai Előretekintési Program” = Technology Foresight Programme Scope national Time horizon 15-25 years Issues Macro + 7 panels Methods Delphi + panels : “visions” product & process Product/process direct

  3. THE SEVEN FORESIGHT PANELS (and the topics of the seven specific reports) • Human resources (education, employment) • Health (life sciences, pharmaceuticals, medical instruments, health care) • IT, telecommunications, media • Natural and built environment • Manufacturing and business processes (new materials, supplier networks, globalisation ...) • Agribusiness and food • Transport

  4. global structural changes Hungary’s strategy MACRO SCENARIOS: STRUCTURE III fundamental II I no drifting (no strategy) active

  5. THREE MACRO SCENARIOS: SUMMARY

  6. Compe-titiveness + Quality of life Healthy + educated society Strong economy S&T priorities (life sciences + ICT) Communications infrastructure Organisational system of R&D Funding and management of innovation Environment Human resources Regulation & Policy GENERIC PRIORITIES

  7. TEP Steering Committee:22 policy recommendations (#1) General recommendation: a development path is necessary, based on knowledge and health, providing dynamic and sustainable development, high quality of life, but the catching-up may not lead to extreme gaps between social groups and regions. (#2-9): Education+Health: Skilled, healthy learning society (#10-12): Clean environment (#13-22): Development of the National Innovation System

  8. TEP S&T policy recommendations (1) (#13-14) Development of the NIS along 3 priorities: 1.Fostering science-business co-operation and mobility. 2. Higher education: not only knowledge generation but also knowledge transfer, stronger business co-operation. 3. Development of implementation institutes (information centres, industrial competence centres, co-operative organisations, incubation) Consortium forming obligation in NRDP (2001), granting soft loans if outsourced to science base (since 1996), support of co-operative research centres (since 2000), new tax rules for extramural orders (2001), preparation of a new university-industry and industry-university mobility programme (2002).

  9. TEP S&T policy recommendations (2) (#15a) Incentives for increasing business R&D expenditures. Obligatory own investment in projects (35-50%, depending on the nature of research). Company R&D expenditures may be deducted twice since 01.Jan, 2001. (#15b) Quick development of the physical R&D infra-structure (measuring equipment and ICT infrastructure). R&D measuring equipment Programme by Ministry of Education, National Informatics Infrastructure Programme (NIIF), participation in GEANT, New Secretariat of State in Prime Minister’s Office for Information Society with large budget and several programmes.

  10. TEP S&T policy recommendations (3) (#16) The government should prepare a report to the Parliament on the state of innovation market incentives, compared to the best practice of the OECD countries. No government report has been prepared, but a large background study has been completed by November 2001 on the best practices of the OECD countries. It is being now a discussion topic. (#17) The government should analyse the impact of the Venture Capital Act (1998) and take measures for fostering the innovation related capital market and investments. The supervision is under discussion; it is a widely shared opinion that the VCA does not contain enough incentives and that is why only one (!) company has declared up to now its operation under this Act.

  11. TEP S&T policy recommendations (4) (#18) The demand for technology intensive products and services should be enhanced by a well established public procurement policy. There are large government PC and Internet access programmes for teachers and civil servants, but it is still an important task. (#19) Long-term research priorities may not prefer narrow interests. A wide range of science fields should be covered, establishing the research of the future. Strong basic science (30-32% of GERD). Infrastructure development and efforts to increase R&D personnel are initiatives promising long-term impact. Programs with no thematic limitation give chance for multidisciplinary and “small” fields.

  12. TEP S&T policy recommendations (5) (#20) In medium term, special attention has to be devoted to life sciences, biotechnology and ICT. These are 3 of the 5 priorities in the new, large National R&D Programmes (#1, #4 and #2, respectively). (#21) The vertical structure of government decision preparation and decision making should be restructured, to be able to treat problems being more and more horizontal. Dialogue with chambers, entrepreneur organisations, trade unions, professional associations. There are joint actions with other ministries (GM), but the government decision making process is still vertical.

  13. TEP S&T policy recommendations (6) (#22) The government should implement the best existing methods and institutions being successful abroad: - establishing an institution for technology assessment, in co-operation with the Parliament (not yet), - establishing a S&T observatory to monitor the state and trends of Hungarian R&D and innovation (not yet), - establishing a central evaluation institution, following the utilisation of public money, dealing with programme and institution evaluation as well (not yet).

  14. Major TEP discussion events and presentations (1997) In Hungary: 12             

  15. Major TEP discussion events and presentations (1998) In Hungary: 37, abroad: 1                             +Lisbon  

  16. Major TEP discussion events and presentations (1999) In Hungary: 22, abroad: 10               + Trieste, Vienna, Helsinki, Brussels, Manchester, Graz, Salzburg, Hamburg, Berlin, Mannheim    

  17. Major TEP discussion events and presentations (2000) In Hungary: 26, abroad: 8            +Bratislava, Brussels, Praha, Wien, Tallin, Planica, Warsawa, Cyprus  

  18. Major TEP discussion events and presentations (2001) In Hungary: 7, abroad: 3      + Stockholm, Roma, Barcelona  

  19. Parliament Committees where the policy recommendations of the Hungarian Foresight Programme were discussed up to now • Environment Committee, 22. November, 2000 (Natural and built environment) • Health and Social Committee, 7. February, 2001 (Health and life sciences) • Education and Science Committee, 21. March, 2001 (Human resources) • Employment and Work Committee, 30. October 2001 (Health and life sciences).

  20. To be continued...

More Related