1 / 21

DG TREN Particulates Consortium

DG TREN Particulates Consortium. Lemnos, 11-12 September 2003. Comments on: 1) Data Analysis 2) Deliverable 14. Neville Thompson, Technical Coordinator, CONCAWE FEMG. Data Analysis.

thuy
Download Presentation

DG TREN Particulates Consortium

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. DG TREN Particulates Consortium Lemnos, 11-12 September 2003 Comments on:1) Data Analysis2) Deliverable 14 Neville Thompson, Technical Coordinator, CONCAWE FEMG

  2. Data Analysis • Particulates data being examined by Shell statistician with experience from EPEFE, also chairman of CEC Statistics Group • Wealth of data available • Only summary parameters for main test cycles examined so far • Full analysis carried out on CONCAWE and AVL data • Screening only on main database • First step is to review data for consistency, trends and outliers • Raw data plots prior to developing means and statistics • Several details need clarification in next update to the data-base • Statistician will need to work closer with LAT/partners

  3. Approach to data analysis • First analysis carried out on CONCAWE (Shell) and AVL data • Data used for Deliverable 14 • 3 repeats carried out on all fuels/engines tested using block design • Arithmetic means used for mass data, geometric means for number counts • Error bars contructed based on pooled SDs and 1.4*SE as in EPEFE • For diesel, where error bars do not overlap we can be 95% confident that there is a difference between the fuels/engines • Gasoline data is currently plotted on the same basis for comparison but this is optimistic in view of lower number of tests • Main data-base • Differences in data – number of repeats, order of testing, different tasks of different partners, cycles tested, outliers make statistical treatment a challenge • Additional spreadsheet developed to enable overview of data by engine and fuel • Initial plots prepared based on mean, min and max data

  4. AVL data – HD Diesel - ESC reg PM

  5. CONCAWE data – LD Diesel - NEDC reg PM

  6. AVL data – ESC ELPI Total N, stages 1-7

  7. CONCAWE data – NEDC ELPI Total N, stages 1-7

  8. AVL data – ESC SMPS data N<30 and N>30

  9. CONCAWE data – 120 km/h - SMPS data N<30 and N>30

  10. Instrument comparison - Summary statisticsAVL HD data

  11. Instrument comparison - Summary statistics CONCAWE LD data

  12. MAIN DATA

  13. Variation in number of repeats carried out by different labs

  14. Order of testing varied between labs

  15. Full database – LD Diesel - NEDC - PM • LD data covers well the newer technology vehicles • Weak on older technologies as a result of INRETS dropping out

  16. Full database – LD Diesel - NEDC - ELPI

  17. Full database – LD Gasoline - NEDC - ELPI

  18. Full database – HD - ESC reg PM

  19. Full database – HD - ETC reg PM

  20. Full database – HD - ESC - ELPI

  21. Deliverable 14 - Effects on particulate emissions and relevance of fuel quality for emission factors • First draft of Deliverable 14 was prepared and circulated in July based on data then available from CONCAWE (Shell) and AVL • Simple means, no statistics • Provided an outline structure for the Deliverable and preliminary conclusions • Only comment was from LAT to update with data from other partners who had tested fuel effects, when available • CONCAWE and AVL data analysis now updated with error bars • Arithmetic means for mass data, geometric means for number counts • Error bars contructed based on pooled SDs and 1.4*SE as in EPEFE • For diesel, where error bars do not overlap we can be 95% confident that there is a difference between the fuels/engines • Gasoline data is currently shown on the same basis for comparison but this is optimistic in view of lower number of tests • Deliverable also updated with mean results from other partners • Fuel trends seem to be broadly consistent, but some additional parameters • Several details on the data still to be resolved • Statistics will follow when the overall data-base is finalised

More Related