1 / 11

SWG Resource Team Update

SWG Resource Team Update. Thomas Carr September 29, 2009 Studies Work Group Call. Topics. Modeling the Base Case (PC1 ) Change Cases Wind Change Cases (PC 2, PC3, PC4) Southwest Change Case (PC6) Near-State Case (PC7 ) OTC/ESA Case (PC5) Expansion Cases Strategy for Next Steps

tiana
Download Presentation

SWG Resource Team Update

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. SWG Resource Team Update Thomas Carr September 29, 2009 Studies Work Group Call

  2. Topics • Modeling the Base Case (PC1) • Change Cases • Wind Change Cases (PC 2, PC3, PC4) • Southwest Change Case (PC6) • Near-State Case (PC7) • OTC/ESA Case (PC5) • Expansion Cases • Strategy for Next Steps • 20-Year Case with 33% renewables • 10-Year Case with 25% renewables • Staff Assessment of Time and Tasks

  3. A. Modeling the Base Case (PC1) • Two prong approach to modeling Base Case • California • 33% RPS target; about 75% of all incremental renewables • CA PUC report: 33% RPS Implementation Analysis / RETI • Reference Case – current procurement and market trends, including large reliance on solar CSP • Out-of-State Case – higher levels of imports from NV and WY • Rest-of-WECC • IRP survey of LSEs outside of CA • L&R data for renewable projects by subregion

  4. Base Case (PC1) cont. • Recent Modeling issues • CA RPS GWh target adjusted downward from 33% Report • Differences in load data btw TEPPC and CA entities • Different years modeled: TEPPC 2019 and CPUC 2020 • 2020 RPS 33% v. 2019 RPS 31.7% prorated • 2020 loads higher than 2019 loads • Take out lowest ranked RETI sites to get targeted GWh • RETI zones: Baja, Palm Springs, San Bernardino-Lucerne • Solar profiles • Previous TEPPC modeling specified solar CSP with storage • CA 33% case assumes high levels of PV and CSP without storage • Keith White obtained new solar profiles from CA working group

  5. B. Change Cases

  6. 1. Wind Change Cases • Three wind change cases: • PC2: Add 3000 MW wind in WY/MT • PC3: Add 3000 MW wind in WA/OR of Lower Columbia • PC4: Add 3000 MW wind in AB/BC • Wind energy differs in each case • PC2: 10,485 GWh • PC3: 7,748 GWh • PC4: 8,378 GWh • Requesters (NTTG/ColumbiaGrid) want to shift constant nameplate capacity (3000 MW) between regions • SWG issue: Whether these change cases should be modeled to maintain constant total energy generation WECC-wide and constant renewable generation to meet RPS target? • Could reduce near equivalent renewable GWh in CA/WA-OR • Utilize some version of the Out-of-state scenario from 33% RPS report

  7. 2. Southwest Change Case (PC6) • Option A: 3 sources, 3 types (most diverse) • AZ 1000 MW solar • NM 1000 MW wind • NV 1000 MW geo • Option B: 2 sources, 2 types (better line utilization) • AZ 1500 MW solar • NM 1500 MW wind • Option C: Substitute CA solar with alternative types • NM 1500 MW wind • NV 1000 MW geo • Option D: Substitute CA solar with other solar • AZ 1500 MW solar • NM 1500 MW solar

  8. 3. Instate or Near-state Case (PC7) • Base Case (PC1) relies heavily on instate renewable generation • CA 33% RPS reference case assumes high in-state renewable development • Other states, IRPs generally rely on local resources • Near-state case would shift CA resources to areas outside but near CA, e.g. • Baja wind, NV geothermal • SWG Issue: Should we proceed with PC7? If so, what form?

  9. 4. OTC/ESA Case (PC5) • Evaluate impact of removing generation subject to Once-Through-Cooling (OTC) and Endangered Species Act (ESA) issues • Mary Johannis compiled list of OTC/ESA generation resources with input from CEC, CAISO, E3 and LSEs. • ESA dam removals • Lower Snake River dams (3033 MW) in WA • Klamath River relicense (169 MW) in OR and CA • OTC generation list (13,855 MW) in CA • Nuclear plants not retired in 2019 (4490 MW) • Replacement generation issue • Air quality constraints

  10. 5. Expansion Cases • Purpose • Expansion cases add transmission in location to identified congestion • Evaluate whether the proposed addition alleviates congestion and other impacts • Expansion cases linked to each change case: • PC2, PC3, PC4, PC5, PC6, PC7 • Study requests: • TransCanada: Zepher, Chinook, NorthernLights • LS Power: Vulcan – G3 Project • NTTG • WestConnect

  11. C. Strategy for Next Steps • Remaining cases in the Study Plan: • 20-year cases (2029) • Long-term 33% Renewable Case (2029 PC1) • Expansion case with transmission added where congestion identified (2029 EC1-1) • Large transmission overlay (2029 EC1-2) • OTC/ESA Impacts (2029 PC2) • 10-year Aggressive RPS (2019) • 25% renewable penetration, 25-40% reduction CO2 emissions, and sensitivities • Might be easier build that 20-year case by adding generation to PC1 • SWG Issue – Given time remaining, should we proceed with 20 year case(s), or 10-year Aggressive RPS? • WECC Staff assessment on tasks and time available

More Related