210 likes | 319 Views
Regional Issues Facing Colorado and Other Western States. WESTAR Spring Business Meeting Denver, Colorado March 30, 2010 Paul Tourangeau Director Colorado Air Pollution Control Division. Colorado Issues. Share a border with 7 states 2 tribes 12 Class I National parks/wilderness areas
E N D
Regional Issues Facing Colorado and Other Western States WESTAR Spring Business Meeting Denver, Colorado March 30, 2010 Paul Tourangeau Director Colorado Air Pollution Control Division
Colorado Issues • Share a border with 7 states • 2 tribes • 12 Class I National parks/wilderness areas • Resources including minerals, forests, oil & gas fields, oil shale, concentrated economic activities/population • NAA for 8-Hour ozone, 9 Counties (1997 standard) • Adjacent activities…growing oil & gas in NM, UT, WY…wintertime ozone in WY and UT
Oil and Gas in the Region Many oil and gas reserves/areas in the WESTAR region
Historically, Problems Solved by Controlling Local (Colorado) Sources • Historically, have had 17 non-attainment areas for various pollutants, and came into attainment with each one by 2002….PM10, 1-Hour O3, CO, NO2, Pb • Local strategies have been effective at bringing areas of Colorado into attainment • E.g., wood stove bans/wood burning restrictions, street sweeping, oxygenated fuels, scrubbers on power plants, vehicle inspection/maintenance, federal Tier II vehicle standards
Current Era – PM and Colorado • PM2.5 is presently not a problem for Colorado, and don’t expect it to be, unless NAAQS are lowered • Only close area is Grand Junction due to deep winter inversions • No monitoring sites in western Colorado to understand transport into CO • EPA has moved up the NAAQS PM review dates: • Propose revised NAAQS in November 2010 • Final NAAQS revisions to be promulgated in July 2011
Air Quality Snapshot Fine Particulate Matter (PM-2.5) • 1997: new annual and 24-hour standard established • 2006: standards tightened • Basis for Trend: Same as PM-10 • Region continues to be in compliance
Current Era – O3 and Colorado • Denver metro area and Front Range region has a long history with ozone nonattainment • Starting with the old 1-hour standard, Denver metro violated standard in the 1980’s and was redesignated attainment in 2001 • Denver/Front Range region exceeded 1997 8-hour standard in early 2000’s, entered into an Early Action Compact to quickly address problems and avoid nonattainment • Numerous controls adopted and implemented, especially O&G measures never before deployed in Colorado • Area could not reach attainment by end of 2007 (1 ppb short at one monitoring site), so designated nonattainment in November 2007 • Revised Ozone Action Plan adopted in 2008 and sent to EPA • Additional O&G, stationary and mobile source controls adopted • EPA’s revised 8-hour standard of 75 ppb, and EPA’s proposed primary and secondary standards, will likely bring in more areas of the state • New measures will be necessary for areas and industries never regulated before
The Ozone ChallengeTrends and StatusDenver Metro/North Front Range Monitored Data “Ozone is not getting worse. It’s been improving since 2006 when ozone controls took effect”
Modeling ResultsExample: Ozone Apportionment Modeling Results for the Rocky Flats Monitoring Site • Charts represent modeling results at one monitor (Rocky Flats North) on one day. • Chart on left represents total modeled ozone including ozone (pink) transported into the area • Chart on right illustrates local ozone EGU, nonroad and motor vehicles the largest contributors to ozone at the Rocky Flats site
Modeling ResultsExample: Ozone Apportionment Modeling Results for the Ft. Collins West Monitoring Site • Charts represent modeling results at one monitor (Ft. Collins West) on one day. • Chart on left represents total modeled ozone including ozone (pink) transported into the area • Chart on right illustrates local ozone O & G and vehicles the largest contributors to ozone at the Fort Collins West site
A Possible 70 ppb Standard Using 2007-2009 data, no change outside of North Front Range area from 75 ppb. (2006-2008 data showed Manitou Springs and Mesa Verde to be in non-attainment.)
A Possible 65 ppb Standard Statewide problem with ozone if NAAQS set at 65 ppb.
Current Era – Boundary/Transport Information • As standards are lowered, transport is becoming more and more important • Haze has brought western states together for many years • Ozone and PM2.5 planning will add additional challenges and require multi-state coordination
Transport – Smoke from Wildfires Note: Long-range transport of smoke into CO from fires in UT, AZ and NM. Transport of smoke from CO fires into WY and NE.
Transport – Blowing Dust Note: Long-range transport of blowing dust from the Painted Desert area in AZ going through the Four Corners area on 4/3/2009. PM10 exceedances were recorded in western CO on this day.
Current Era – Legal and Administrative Considerations • 110 SIP requirements for Non-Attainment Areas • 110(a)(2)(d) SIP requirements for interstate transport (demonstrations, possible measures) • Cross-border Non-Attainment Areas [[4 Corners, SoCal and SW Az, Sacto/Reno, etc.??) • 126 petitions • NEPA EISs on federal lands for energy development in broad areas…??? • EPA funding for western studies and strategies under draft 2011 Grant Guidance…western O3??? • RPO…WESTAR…coordination???