180 likes | 192 Views
Explore classification standards and validation methods for high school accountability. Analyze data from nSPARC at Mississippi State University (SY 2011-12) and Mississippi Department of Education (SY 2012-13). Compare initial and validated standards on a scale of 0-1000 and 0-900. Examine composite score distribution, frequency distribution, and rating distribution for high schools. Investigate weighting indicators for graduation rate, U.S. History, and Science. Compare weighted and unweighted data using descriptives, correlation, and delta comparison analysis.
E N D
Classification Standards Validation for High School Accountability Jackson, MS March 25, 2014
Supplemental Information • Initial Standards for High Schools • Data source: nSPARC at Mississippi State University • Data year: SY 2011-12 • Indicators: n = 10; No weighting • Scale: 0-1000 • Sample: 250 • Mean: 605 pts., Median: 610 pts., SE 8 pts., SD 120 pts. • Validated Standards for High Schools • Data source: Mississippi Department of Education • Data year: SY 2012-13 • Indicators: n = 9; Weighting (see Handout #1) • Scale: 0-900 • Sample: 235 • Mean: 612 pts., Median: 615 pts., SE 6 pts., SD 94 pts.
Composite Score Distribution -Histogram for High Schools-
Composite Score Distribution -Box Plot for High Schools-
Frequency Distribution -High School Ratings-
Rating Distribution -Box Plots for High Schools-
Weighting Indicators -Graduation Rate- -U.S. History- -Science-
Validated High School Standards: Spring 2014 -Weighted vs. Unweighted- (Descriptives)
Validated High School Standards: Spring 2014 -Weighted vs. Unweighted-(Correlation)
Validated High School Standards: Spring 2014 -Weighted vs. Unweighted (Delta Comparison)-