1 / 9

Dilworth STEM Academy 2018-19 Performance Data

Understand the school star rating system and the performance indicators used to determine the rating. Find out how Dilworth STEM Academy improved its metrics to achieve their goals and the strategies in place for continued success.

turnerm
Download Presentation

Dilworth STEM Academy 2018-19 Performance Data

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Dilworth STEM Academy2018-19 Performance Data Understanding our school star rating

  2. NEVADA School Performance Framework • Schools receive points based on student performance across various indicators and measures … these include the following: • Academic growth • Academic achievement • Closing opportunity gaps • English language acquisition • Engagement

  3. How is the Star Rating Determined? • Points are totaled and divided by the points possible to generate an index score from 1-100. Index scores are associated with a one- to five-star rating as follows: • Below 29 points = 1 STAR • 29 to 49.99 points = 2 STARS • 50 to 69.99 points = 3 STARS • 70 to 79.99 points = 4 STARS • At/above 80 points = 5 STARS

  4. Dilworth 2018-19 school rating Index Score = 41 Rating = 2 STAR

  5. Targeted Support & Improvement (TSI) Designation • Dilworth STEM Academy has been designated as a TSI school during the 2019-2020 school year

  6. How are schools identified as TSI? • One or more subgroups not meeting target(s) two years in a row on one or more measures within Academic Achievement Indicator (Math proficiency, ELA proficiency, or RBG3) AND • One or more subgroups not meetings target(s) two years in a row within two or more remaining Indicators: Growth (Math/ELA MGP/AGP), ELPA (WIDA AGP), or Student Engagement (Math/ELA Opportunity Gap, Chronic Absenteeism)

  7. Current DaTA Goal 1: Growth in ELA, Math, and Science Increase Catch up/Keep Up AGP by 2% in ELA and Math, and 2% increase in science scores GOAL NOT MET • ELA: Overall 2% increase • Decline in EL (1%), increase in IEP (1%), increase in FRL (3%) • Math: Overall 3% decline • Decline in EL (1%), decline in IEP (1%), decline in FRL (1%) • Science: Overall 12% decline in proficiency

  8. Current DaTA Goal 2: Improved Climate Increase 3% in certain categories GOAL NOT MET • Overall decline in student survey response rates in most categories • Overall decline in family survey response rates in most categories • Overall decline in staff survey response rates in most categories Reasons: Change in timelines with surveys, not enough positive push for surveys, low response rates, change in leadership, lengthy questions

  9. Next Steps for SPP • Continued goals similar to the previous school performance plan • School performance goals focused on • ELA, math, science scores for proficiency and growth • Tier I instruction for all students • Improved climate and engagement • Family engagement plan goals focused on • Student led conferences • Home visits

More Related