200 likes | 451 Views
Future Energy Overview. 2009 GCAA Management Workshop February 17, 2009 Jeff Burleson Director, Resource Policy and Planning Georgia Power Company. Current Situation. Fuel prices have declined Retail gasoline $4.00 vs 1.50 per gallon
E N D
Future Energy Overview 2009 GCAA Management Workshop February 17, 2009 Jeff Burleson Director, Resource Policy and Planning Georgia Power Company
Current Situation • Fuel prices have declined • Retail gasoline $4.00 vs 1.50 per gallon • Wholesale natural gas $13 vs 6 per million btu • Central Appalachian coal $120 vs 60 per ton • But for the wrong reason • Economic downturn lowering current and near term outlook for demand • Fuel prices will climb again in the future • Only a matter of time • Over half of U.S. oil consumption is from imports • Natural gas imports projected to rise significantly over long term • No single fix, nor quick fix • Requires holistic, sustained efforts • Environmental requirements will increase
US Electricity Generation by RegionHistory and projection, 1990-2030 Projected growth 2008-2030 34% 25% 34% 22% 11% History Projection Data Source: Energy Information Administration, US Department of Energy
Fuel Price Risk Coal vs. Gas Prices
Environmental Uncertainty AMFA ARPAA-88 AIA ASBCAA-88 ESAA-88 FIRAA-88 TOSCAA-88 NWPAA-88 CPDRAA-88 NMSPAA-888 FCRPA MMPAA-88 ODBA SFA FWLA-88 ICPBD EDP OPA RECA CAA-90 CCRA CLFWRA HMTUSA NEEA PPA PPVA IEREA ANTPA GLCPA ASA CZMAA-90 WRDA FFCA CERFA CRAA-92 150 SDWAA-86 SARA-86 AOA BLRA ERDDAA EAWA NOPPA PTSA UMTRCA ESAA-78 QCA NCPA RCRAA-84 WLDI MPRSAA-82 NAWCA NWPA ESAA-82 WQA No. of Laws 100 NEPA EQIA CAA EPA OSHA FAWRAA-70 APA SWDA CERCLA CZMIA COWLDA FWLCA MPRSAA-80 ANISCA CAAA-77 CWA SMCRA SWRCA SDWAA-77 LLA-81 ARPA TOSCA FLPMA RCRA NFMA CZMAA-76 HMTA WSRA EA RCHSA ESA TAPA BLBA FWPCA MPRSA CZMA NCA FEPCA FWSA MMPA NHPA PFW FOIA 50 FCMHSA ESCA FHSA NFMUA FWCAA-58 AQA AEA TA FWCA BPA FWA FIFRA WRPA AFCA AEPA WLDA MBTA MBCA PAA NPS OPA FAWRA CAA-55 WA NBRA AA VA RHA NLR A WPA SCS WPCA YOS RTC FEATH IA 0 LA 1862 1872 1882 1892 1902 1912 1922 1932 1942 1952 1962 1972 1982 1992 2001
Some Elements of a Sound Energy Strategy • More fuel efficient automobiles to reduce oil imports • Plug-in hybrid electric vehicles • Energy efficiency and demand reduction • Increase fuel diversity of electric generation • Fully develop all cost effective applications of renewable generation • Nuclear
Planning to Ensure a Reliable and Economic Electric Supply • Uncertainties include • Long term fuel costs and availability • Long term environmental requirements • Customer response to Demand Side Management (DSM) programs • Long lead times for new resources • Typically 3 to 10 years • Resources typically last 30 to 60 years • Robust, comprehensive planning process • Integrated Resource Planning (IRP) • Frequent validation and updates, as needed
Strategic Options for Meeting Generation Needs • Supply Decisions • Pulverized coal • Natural gas combined cycle • Integrated gasification combined cycle • Nuclear • Renewable energy • Demand Side Management
Georgia Power Anticipated Plan for the Next Decade • 12-20% renewable and DSM • Plant Mitchell conversion to biomass • One of largest wood biomass plants in US • Solar research project • 2011 possible expansion • Limited potential • 69-76% natural gas capacity (50% add’l gas energy generation) • Price and volatility • 12% nuclear • First U.S. nuclear planned in 30 years
Georgia Power Supply Capability by Fuel Type † Includes generics & PPAs
Contracts with Renewable Generators • May invest more than $1 billion on capacity and energy from renewable generation developers over next 10 years if all projects proceed
Nuclear Power Cost-Effective when Compared to Alternatives: • Significant lifetime savings • $2 - $6.5 billion when compared to pulverized coal • $1 - $6.5 billion when compared to natural gas combined cycle • Reduces exposure to high natural gas prices and future costs of potential carbon legislation • Natural gas prices rose 400 percent between Jan 31, 2002 and Jun 30, 2008 • Future costs of potential carbon legislation could be significant for coal • Natural gas generation more sensitive to fuel price fluctuations • 60 to 80 percent of cost per kWh from natural gas plant is fuel • About 10 percent of nuclear generation cost is fuel
Base Load Generating Capacity Needed: • Georgia Power’s last base load plant was added in 1989 • Natural gas capacity increased from 7 percent to 37 percent since 1989 • New coal power plants less attractive • Increased environmental requirements • Coal fuel has more than doubled in a year • Cost of potential carbon legislation could be significant.
Demand Side Management (DSM) will Play a Key Role but Cannot Displace all Generation Need • Within 10 years, Georgia Power will have 1,900–2,200 MWs DSM • DSM will play a key role, but not cost effective to achieve DSM maximum potential of 3,000 megawatts • DSM is less reliable • Energy efficiency programs do not provide constant load reductions in all hours of year • Base load generation typically operates 24 hours per day, 7 days per week, throughout entire year
Summary • Planning to ensure an economic and reliable supply of electricity • Georgia Power pursuing diverse and economic portfolio of new generation resources • nuclear • renewables and usage reduction • natural gas