1 / 23

Emotional Intelligence and Transformational Leadership: A Meta-analysis

Emotional Intelligence and Transformational Leadership: A Meta-analysis. P.D. Harms, University of Nebraska at Lincoln Marcus Credé , State University of New York at Albany. Beginnings. Began as a meta-analysis of the process behind transformational leadership

ura
Download Presentation

Emotional Intelligence and Transformational Leadership: A Meta-analysis

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Emotional Intelligence and Transformational Leadership: A Meta-analysis P.D. Harms, University of Nebraska at Lincoln Marcus Credé, State University of New York at Albany

  2. Beginnings • Began as a meta-analysis of the process behind transformational leadership • Transformational => Job Attitudes => Performance • While coding noticed large # of studies on the relationship of emotional intelligence (EI) to transformational leadership (TFL) • Nearly all began by stating that the relationship was in doubt, but the goal was to show a link • Meta-analysis? No. • Time to resolve the controversy

  3. Why EI? • Hyperbolic claims about predictive power of EI from both researchers and distributors • What is the basis for looking to EI? 1) Relationships between TFL and Big Five have been called disappointing 2) False assumption that there has been a great deal of research attempting to link IQ and TFL - comments by Bass suggesting small relationship 3) Prior meta-analyses linking EI with performance and mental and physical health outcomes

  4. So What is EI? • Positioned as an alternative to cognitive ability • An ability to generate, recognize, express, understand and evaluate emotions in self and others and to use them to guide thinking and action • Trait-based: lower-level personality characteristic • Ability-based: comprehending and regulating emotions • Measures range from self-report to projection tasks to situational judgment tasks • Often scored according to consensus or expert ratings

  5. Why Should We Expect EI to be Related to TFL? • Full-Range Leadership Theory • One of the most widely researched areas of leadership theory • Theoretically reflects the difference between extremely high-performing leaders and ordinary leaders • 5 components of TFL • Contingent Reward • Management-by-Exception • Laissez-Faire • Linked with leader performance as well as subordinate satisfaction and motivation

  6. Why Should We Expect EI to be Related to TFL? • Use of emotions by primates in dominance displays • Self-confidence, self-awareness, transparency, and empathy may be necessary for communicating visions • Emotional appeals for inspirational visions • Sosik & Megarian (1999) • Empathy needed for individualized consideration • Emotion management promotes positive affect in followers which may lead to more idea generation and expression • Self-aware leaders may have greater sense of purpose • Those skilled at emotional management may be more likely to put others’ needs before their own

  7. Hypothesized Relationships • H1: EI should be positively related to higher TFL • H2: EI should be positively related to higher CR • CR should be related to perceiving what others feel is equitable • H3: EI should be negatively related to MBE-P and LF • Higher EI is theoretically linked with greater initiative-taking and self-efficacy for action

  8. Why is There a Controversy? • Cult-like atmosphere surrounding EI • Simplistic assumptions • “there must be more than just IQ” • Hyperbolic claims contrasted with data to the contrary • Meta-analysis on EI-performance showed no incremental effect • No studies have found incremental validity beyond B5 and IQ • Lack of consensus within EI community over definitions and proper way to assess it • Lack of any well-done validation research

  9. Attempt at Resolution: Meta-Analysis • Initial search yielded 106 possible articles • Coded only those with explicit EI measures that had data reported that could be translated into zero-order correlations • 62 independent samples • 38 used the MLQ • 7145 leaders • Hunter and Schmidt (2004) meta-analytic method

  10. Results: Overall • Ocular test revealed clear differences between effect sizes of studies with same-source data and those with multi-source data

  11. Search for Moderators: Effect of Leader Rank • Higher level execs more strategic (higher O) • Lower level execs more production-focused (higher C) • May require greater EI to ascend to upper-levels

  12. Search for Moderators: Effect of Type of Emotional Intelligence • Relationships between types are not substantial • Also, it was recently proposed that trait-based EI mediates ability-based EI

  13. Search for Moderators: Effect of Publication Type • Large number of dissertations attempting to uncover link between EI and TFL • Many of these from “diploma mill” schools

  14. Search for Moderators: Effect of Emotional Intelligence Inventory • Prior research has noted that correlations between different measures are not high • Ability measures were all MSCEIT

  15. Search for Moderators: Effect of TFL Inventory • It is possible that certain measures of TFL are better at capturing the emotional element

  16. Subcomponents of Full-Range Leadership • The 5 components of transformational leadership and contingent reward all showed the same pattern of decreasing validities • Some decreased to zero • MBE-P and LF had negative relationships • Also showed decreasing validities • Largest relationship found when multi-source ratings were used was for Laissez-Faire (-.17)

  17. Other Issues: Inter-rater Agreement • Inter-rater agreement important for determining whether or not sources are rating the same behaviors • Accuracy vs. Bias

  18. Incremental Validity • Constructs live and (ought to) die based on whether or not they can add incremental predictive power to existing constructs • IQ and Big 5 • Prior meta-analytic estimates used to create correlation matrix • No IQ-TFL estimate was found • Lack of sufficient studies available to estimate reliably

  19. Incremental Validity

  20. Discussion • It appears that the mixed findings in past research were largely due to method effects • Moderate relationship between EI and TFL decreased to being very small when multiple sources were used • No other moderators found • Absolutely no incremental validity was found over Big Five traits • Any existing predictive validity due to construct overlap

  21. Limitations • Some have argued that it is unfair to judge EI based on its merits because it has only been around a short time • 100’s of studies thus far. More than most other constructs. • There exists no well-designed validation study for any EI measure • It is hard to evaluate the utility of a construct when we aren’t sure we are actually assessing it • Majority of studies were poorly designed • Majority of studies came from unpublished sources

  22. Future Directions • Future for EI? • The present results do not mean that EI as a construct should be written off • Better measures should be designed and used • Better studies are needed (sample size and source) • Zombie-like quality • Eats other constructs over time and can’t be killed • Do we need to learn to live with it? Is it the new MBTI? • Future of the TFL? • IRT-based measures are needed

  23. Future Directions • The irony of a meta-analysis about EI and Transformational Leadership is… • It indicates the need for more research relating IQ to Transformational Leadership • NOTE: We’re really not bad at predicting leadership • Other personality variables • Look to the Neo-Socioanalytic Model • Attachment • Motives, Goals, Values, Interests • Narratives • Perceptions

More Related