170 likes | 347 Views
Off-Shore Windpark Projekt Kaliningrad. The Squad. Prof. Andrey Nikishin Gilbert Duee Berno Hellauer Max Mueller Andreas Rembold Aurelio Schug. Abbas Seifeddine Moritz Schneider Kevin Weber Sebastian Westphal. 1 - Aims of the project 2 - What we did in the project
E N D
The Squad Prof. Andrey Nikishin • Gilbert Duee • Berno Hellauer • Max Mueller • Andreas Rembold • Aurelio Schug • Abbas Seifeddine • Moritz Schneider • Kevin Weber • Sebastian Westphal
1 - Aims of the project 2 - What we did in the project 3 - Installation Site Selection 4 - Power production assessment 5 - Environmental Review 6 - Interconnection Studies 7 - Financial Aspects 8 – Conclusion and Proposals Table of contents
convince Russia to build offshore windfarms basic planning of 115/130MW windfarm in Kaliningrad region feasibility study 1 - Aims of the Project
Collect information: - technical - legislative - financial aspects Basic planning and feasibilty calculation of offshore windfarms for Kaliningrad region Conclusions and proposals 2 - What we did in the project
Our project includes: Installation Site Selection Power production assessment Environmental Review Interconnection Studies Financial Aspects 2 - What we did in the project
P, kW fy,i % Annual wind speed m/s Wind speed m/s 4 - Power production assessment
5 - Environmental review EIA and ecological assessment • EIA procedure promotes decision making on realization of planned activity taking into account: • possible adverse effects and environmental consequences; • public opinion; • working out measures of decreasing and prevention of effects EIA is carried out in few steps. 1. Preliminary assessments for requirements specification development of EIA. 2. Requirements specification making. 3. EIA investigations. 4. Preparation of preliminary EIA. 5. Public discussions.
4 – Financial aspects Pnom - Ins. Cost - Payback period –
Data WF1 WF2 Pnom: 130 MW n-ntur: 65 Van: 8.5 m/s Ean: 562 GWh Total cost: 225 Mio € Paybackperiod: In Rus: ca. 7 Years In Ger: ca. 3 Years Ins. costs: 1718 €/kW • Pnom: 115 MW • n-ntur: 58 • Van: 9.2 m/s • Ean: 489 GWh • Total cost: 192 Mio € • Paybackperiod: • In Rus: ca. 8 Years • In Ger: ca. 3 Years • Ins. costs: 1717 €/kW
8 – Conclusions • No offshore wind energy development program; • No standards for evaluation of environmental and other impacts; • No other guiding documents; • No stimulation for production of wind electricity; • No one-desk policy; • Favorable wind conditions; • Enough place in suitable depths • Minimum environmental conflicts • Economically feasible • Growing interest by investors • Possibilities for connection to the grid Kaliningrad region has a good perspectives for offshore wind power development
Use the experience of EU to prepare normative documentation and standards. Financial stimulation for green power in Russia. Encoureging the local people to accept such projects. Use the modern wind power technology 8 - Proposals