1 / 15

Semi-Final Match Analysis

Semi-Final Match Analysis. By Jim Stone & Shelton Collier. Stanford Box Score Analysis. By Jim Stone. ATTACKS Barboza (1) – 16% (2) 10% (3) 62% (4) 35% (5) 42% Akinradewo (1) 0% (2) 40% (3) 30% (4) 71%

vaughan-england
Download Presentation

Semi-Final Match Analysis

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Semi-Final Match Analysis By Jim Stone & Shelton Collier

  2. Stanford Box Score Analysis • By Jim Stone ATTACKS Barboza (1) – 16% (2) 10% (3) 62% (4) 35% (5) 42% Akinradewo (1) 0% (2) 40% (3) 30% (4) 71% (5) 75% Okogbaa 10 attempts –30%

  3. Stanford Box Score Analysis • By Jim Stone PASS (1) 2.26 (2) 2.14 (3) 2.29 (4) 2.50 (5) 2.20

  4. Stanford Box Score Analysis • By Jim Stone FOR THE MATCH: Okogbaa Hit –30% Block – 2 Assist Score – 2.0 Pts.

  5. Penn State Box Score Analysis • By Shelton Collier • Penn State Hitting Efficiency for the season .403 • Game 1 and 2 Combined Penn State Hits .400 • Game 3 and 4 combined Penn State Hits .200 (season low .103 game 3) • Game 3 and 4 Nebraska hits .349 (hit .277 for the season)

  6. Penn State Box Score Analysis • By Shelton Collier • Game 5 Penn State 9 – 1 – 25 .320 (passed 2.5) Nebraska 9 – 4 – 28 .179 (passed 1.7) • Key Points in Game 5: • Penn State 3 point run • Point 10: Nebraska attack error • Point 11: Nebraska attack error • Point 12: Nebraska Aced

  7. Penn State Box Score Analysis • By Shelton Collier • OVERALL: • Penn State Sideout Efficiency 65% • Nebraska Sideout Efficiency 60% • Ace to Error Ratio: Both teams 3 Aces / 8 Errors

  8. Penn State Box Score Analysis • By Shelton Collier • First Ball Sideout Efficiency • Penn State Perfect Pass (47) .430 • “2” pass (17) .060 • Nebraska • Perfect Pass (20) .350 • “2” pass (47) .230

  9. Penn State Box Score Analysis • By Shelton Collier • Passing • Penn State perfect pass (47) .430 • “2” pass (17) .060 • Nebraska • Perfect Pass (20) .350 • “2” pass (47) .230

  10. Penn State Box Score Analysis • By Shelton Collier • Passing Penn State Nebraska Game 1 Game 2 Game 3 Game 4 Game 5 2.5 2.2 1.9 2.2 2.5 1.6 2.0 2.1 2.1 1.7

  11. How did Nebraska almost Pull it Off!? • Right Side Attack: Mostly to Outside Hitters vs. predominantly Hodge • Made Passers Bend and Served Everyone (no target) • Pipe to Right Back • Center Back Defense vs. Fawcett (32 Digs) • Very few tips / Off speed ------ Lots of high hands Larson/Mueller

  12. Stanford Game Plan Strategy • Barboza and Klineman Must hit high/hard off block No short tips over block No passive roll shots • Must have high efficiency attack in the middle (Akinradewo/Okagbaa) Last year’s championship match / 5 games Akinradewo 18 – 1 – 40 .425 Girard 10 – 2 – 20 .400 • Thursday vs. Texas Akinradewo 17 - 3 – 31 .452 Okagbaa 1 – 4 – 10 -.300 Okagbaa first / only kill not until game 4 • Great defense, “Nebraska blue collar” work ethic will get Nebraska crowd invested in cheering for/pushing Stanford

  13. Stanford Game Plan Strategy • SERVE, HARD, FLAT WITH PACEThe high “lollipup” short serve has not been effective all year.Low short serve that drops off; much more effective.Trying to serve Hodge as a primary tactic has not been effective all year. (2.3 vs Nebraska)Nebraska attempted to serve Fawcett. Fawcett passed only 1.8 vs Nebraska. Holehouse and Hodge try to help her taking seams or cutting in front of her. Holehouse 2.4

  14. Stanford Game Plan Strategy Key factor last year vs. Penn State in Championship match: Stanford 9 aces / 11 errors: aggressive servingLearn from Nebraska: After down 0-2, Cook says in interview: “we must serve tougher to win” Game 3 Penn State passes 1.9 Stanford: start the match with tougher serving.

  15. Conclusion Semi-Final Match Analysis By Jim Stone & Shelton Collier

More Related