1 / 9

OSEHRA Architecture Work Group Meeting January 19 th , 2016

OSEHRA Architecture Work Group Meeting January 19 th , 2016 Discussion on Veteran-focused Integration Process (VIP) Jack Taylor, M.D., Chief Medical Information Officer, BITS, Co-chair AWG. Introduction. The revision of the PMAS has been much discussed, and has now been published

vbrewer
Download Presentation

OSEHRA Architecture Work Group Meeting January 19 th , 2016

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. OSEHRA Architecture Work Group Meeting January 19th, 2016 Discussion on Veteran-focused Integration Process (VIP) Jack Taylor, M.D., Chief Medical Information Officer, BITS, Co-chair AWG

  2. Introduction The revision of the PMAS has been much discussed, and has now been published Ms. LaVerne Council outlined the approach in her briefing to the Veterans Small Business meeting in Pittsburgh in early November Now it is fact and policy, and as it settles in, it is likely to affect all who are engaged in VA OIT business The document (Guide) has been out and provided on the AWG site, and in a message from Dr. Seong K. Mun of OSEHRA We are hosting this session to start a discussion

  3. Recent direction in RFP From a recent (this week) RFP: OI&T intends to transition projects from the Project Management Accountability System (PMAS) project management process into the Veteran-focused Integration Process (VIP) project management process in the 2016-2017 timeframe (https://www.voa.va.gov/DocumentView.aspx?DocumentID=4371).  VIP is a Lean-Agile framework that services the interest of Veterans through the efficient streamlining of activities that occur within the enterprise. VIP is the follow-on framework from PMAS for the development and management of IT projects which will propel the Department with even more rigor toward Veteran-focused delivery of IT capabilities.  The VIP framework unifies and streamlines IT delivery oversight and will deliver IT products more efficiently, securely and predictably.  The VIP framework creates an environment delivering more frequent releases through a deeper application of Agile practices.  In parallel with a single integrated release process, VIP will increase cross-organizational and business stakeholder engagement, provide greater visibility into projects, increase Agile adoption and institute a predictive delivery cadence. VIP is a significant evolution from PMAS, creating a more flexible process that has fewer documentation requirements and milestones, and delivers products in shorter increments.  VIP is currently undergoing a Pilot Program and is currently in a draft state and will continue to evolve.  Once the pilot is complete, requirements outlined in this PWS may be transitioned to the VIP framework during the Period of Performance of this contract.

  4. Why we are discussing this

  5. From the Guide: 1.3 Characteristics VIP is a significant step forward for VA, allowing greatly needed IT services to be delivered to Veterans more frequently, via a three-month release cadence and a minimally invasive oversight process. It differs from PMAS in the following ways: From (PMAS) To (VIP) 58 ArtifactsData Driven (7 Data Categories + ATO) 5 Phase Gates/ Milestones 2 Critical Decision Events Multiple Release processes 1 integrated Release process 6 month delivery cycle 3 month delivery cycle Ad-hoc hierarchy of programs and projects Portfolio-based management Waterfall Agile Security + Architecture late in the process Security + Architecture standards leveraged during the planning phase Project-centered (tactical) Portfolio-centered (Strategic)

  6. Details: The following table offers guidelines to assist the Portfolio Manager in assessing a project’s risk and visibility.

  7. Agile Terminology What It Means… • Build The measurable period of time to deliver functionality—maximum length is three months • Build Plan The prioritized list of functionality that will be delivered in a three month build • Epic A large customer-facing initiative that can be broken down into multiple user stories • User Story High level definition of a requirement • Daily Scrum Daily 15-minute meeting for the team members to communicate progress by answering three questions, including: 1. What did you accomplish yesterday? 2. What will you accomplish today? 3. Do you have any impediments? • Scrum of Scrums Cross-team meeting to communicate progress; follows the same format as the Daily Scrum • Grooming Reviewing, adjusting and reprioritizing a backlog to ensure the customer’s highest priorities are continually being met • Sprint A regular work cycle that is typically 2-4 weeks in length • Sprint Plan A prioritized list of work a team commits to completing during a Sprint • Sprint Review A review of the output and product at the end of a Sprint to ensure customer acceptance • Critical Decision (CD) Events Two coordinated OI&T review points within the VIP framework that determine if a project is ready to move forward • Integrated Release Process One unified release process

  8. One Slide to talk to – with the VIP Guide open

  9. Agenda for Next Week – January 26 Title: Object Chronicles as a Foundation for Integrated Informatics Architecture Presenter: Keith E Campbell MD PhD, Director of Informatics Architecture at U.S. Veterans Health Administration Description: SNOMED CT changed its release formats in ~2010 to support uniform representation of change over time across all components. Given the interdependency between architectural layers (terminology, assertions, rules, and more), having a uniform representation of change over time, and a system of modules for managing dependencies between components is critical to achieving manageability and scalability of informatics-enabled systems. This presentation will describe our experiences implementing this uniform representation by providing a persistent representation of object chronicles.

More Related