1 / 21

CAADP IMPLEMENTATION IN COMESA

CAADP IMPLEMENTATION IN COMESA. The CAADP Investment Programmes Design and Implementation Workshop 20-22 October 2010 Intercontinental Hotel Nairobi, Kenya. Presented by: Dr Sam G. Kanyarukiga CAADP Coordinator -COMESA skanyarukiga@comesa.int. OUTLINE OF PRESENTATION.

vicki
Download Presentation

CAADP IMPLEMENTATION IN COMESA

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. CAADP IMPLEMENTATION IN COMESA The CAADP Investment Programmes Design and Implementation Workshop 20-22 October 2010 Intercontinental Hotel Nairobi, Kenya Presented by: Dr Sam G. Kanyarukiga CAADP Coordinator -COMESA skanyarukiga@comesa.int

  2. OUTLINE OF PRESENTATION • THE COMESA REGION • THE CAADP IMPLEMENTATION PROCESS • MANAGEMENT LEVELS • CAADP PROCESS BENCHMARKS • CURRENT STATUS IN COMESA • COMPACT SIGNATURES • POST-COMPACT STATUS • QUALITY OF INVESTMENT PLANS • COMESA REGIONAL COMPACT • OBJECTIVES OF REGIONAL COMPACT • CURRENT STATUS

  3. I.I. THE COMESA REGION 19 Countries 400 Million people

  4. II CAADP IMPLEMENTATION PROCESS

  5. II.1 Management Levels • AUC • NPCA • RECs • Country-Led and Owned • In –Country Stakeholders (Country Teams, Private Sector, CSOs, Farmers Organizations), DPs etc.

  6. II.2 CAADP Process Benchmarks • COMPACT SIGNATURES • Launch • Consultative Process • Stocktaking and Growth Options Analysis

  7. II.2 CAADP Process Benchmarks • POST COMPACT PROCESS • Investment Programmes • Quality (Alignment, Consistency, Coherence, Pillars) • Expert Inputs • Costing • Best Practices

  8. II.2 CAADP Process Benchmarks • POST COMPACT PROCESS b. Technical Reviews • Led by AUC, NPCA, RECs • Independent Experts • In-Country Consultations and Document Review • Technical Review Report

  9. II.2 CAADP Process Benchmarks • POST COMPACT PROCESS c. Post-Compact High-Level Business Meeting • Presentation of: • Investment Plans and Budget by Govt • Technical Review Report • Recommendations for improvement • Roadmap for Improvement • Formulation of Gap Financing Proposals

  10. III CURRENT STATUS IN COMESA

  11. III.1 Compact Signatures COMESA • Rwanda – March 2006 • Burundi –August 2009 • Ethiopia – August 2008 • Swaziland March 2010 • Uganda – March 2010 • Malawi – April 2010 • Kenya – July 2010 • Tanzania - July 2010 (EAC)

  12. III. 1 Compact Signatures • Advanced Countries • Zambia • Zimbabwe • Seychelles • Djibouti • Sudan • Zimbabwe • Launches • DRC • Egypt • Eritrea

  13. III.2 Post Compact Status Technical Reviews • Rwanda: December 2009 • Uganda: September 2010 • Kenya: September 2010 • Malawi: September 2010 • Ethiopia: October 2010

  14. III.2 Post Compact Status Business Meetings • Rwanda: December 2009; gap funding accessed at 80%; USD 50m (GAFSP June 2010) • Uganda: September 2010 • Kenya: September 2010 Next • Malawi: Planned for 13-14 October 2010 • Ethiopia: Nov/December • Tanzania: TR and BM – Nov/Dec 2010

  15. III.3 Quality of Investment Plans At Compact Signature • Not refined • Not well costed • Not fully aligned At Business Meetings • Significant Improvement • Experts Inputs • Technical Assistance • Specialized Agencies

  16. III.3 Quality of Investment Plans General Issues of Investment Plans • Low capacity of In-Country Teams • Insufficient Technical Assistance • Inadequate Programme Coherence • Imbalances between investment areas and 4 pillars • Insufficient consideration of value chain development • Coherence between expenditure and economic impact and poverty reduction • M&E Framework and implementation modalities

  17. III.3 Quality of Investment Plans Way forward for improved Investment Programmes: • Improvement of Quality since development of Post-Compact Roadmap • Room for further improvement • Focus on Post-Compact resulting in slow down of progress in countries at Pre-Compact Stage

  18. IV COMESA REGIONAL COMPACT

  19. IV.1 Objective of Regional Compact • AUC/NEPAD Recommendation • Add value to National CAADP Compact • Facilitate investments in areas where individual countries cannot effectively invest e.g. Trans-boundary and multi –country areas • Increased involvement of private sector, PPPs and development partners • To forge regional cooperation and integration

  20. IV.2 Current Status • Draft Regional Compact Document is ready since early September • Major Areas: • Agriculture Commodities along the Value Chains • Productive Infrastructure for increased productivity, value addition and trade • Institutional and Human Resource Development at all levels (Farmers, Trader, processors etc. ) • Next Steps • Extension into Tripartite Framework – COMESA, EAC, SADC

  21. Thank you!

More Related