280 likes | 507 Views
2. Overview ? Japanese business environment. Business conglomeratesZaibatsuSingle family controlledCentral holding companyPyramid structureIn 1930's 4 Zaibatsus controlled 25% of Japanese businessZaibatsus dissolved in 1947. 3. Keiretsu ? key to business. "Big Six" enterprise complexes (Mitsu
E N D
1. 1 Guru to the Western world Japan Week 3
2. 2 Overview – Japanese business environment Business conglomerates
Zaibatsu
Single family controlled
Central holding company
Pyramid structure
In 1930’s 4 Zaibatsus controlled 25% of Japanese business
Zaibatsus dissolved in 1947
3. 3 Keiretsu – key to business "Big Six" enterprise complexes (Mitsui, Mitsubishi, Sumitomo, Fuyo, Sanwa and Dai–ichi Kangyo)
Horizontal Type – diversify in many fields
Typical structure -
stable vertical cross–shareholding relationships
horizontal affiliations reaching diverse markets
possession of large–scale economic resources
often close managerial ties
executives sit on boards for several companies
regular presidents meetings
4. 4 Keiretsu – key to business Common trait to all “Big Six” within complex is
central city bank
general trading company
insurance company
In 1992 “Big Six” members represented only 0.007% of registered companies but controlled
19.29% of capital
16.56% of assets
18.37% of sales
5. 5 Vertical Keiretsu Vertical type – large manufacturing company groups held together by capital ties
Typically umbrella format
Examples:
Matsushita
Hitachi
Toshiba
Tokyo Electric Power
Toyota
6. 6 Vertical Keiretsu Commonly held together by
capital ties
long–term contracts
financial and technological support
Frequently spin off divisions to become separate companies linked to parent
1995 estimated suggested largest 30 groups were comprised of approximately 12,577 subsidiaries and affiliated entities
7. 7 Business related Keiretsu Business related - companies tied to groups by business relationships
E.g. assembler – supplier relationships
8. 8 Highly protectionist activities Congressional Research Service report (1994) raises several international trade issues
Keiretsu tend to buy from within their groups and may discriminate against other exporters to Japan
Allegedly “Big Six” made 68% of their purchases from companies in which they had at least a 10% equity interest and bought only 5% from foreign unrelated companies
Official figures are 15% inter-company purchases
9. 9 Highly protectionist activities Japanese transplant automakers, in particular, have relied heavily on their traditional Japanese suppliers who have followed them to their U.S. plants
Keiretsu ties may provide an advantage to Japanese companies in developing new technology or in long-term planning
Keiretsu distribution systems may discriminate against foreign producers in reaching the retail Japanese consumer
Keiretsu stockholding patterns make the buying and selling of Japanese companies, let alone hostile takeovers, nearly impossible
10. 10 Keiretsu – trading links All Keiretsus have the support of a Trading Company (Sogo Shosha)
These provide range of goods and services
It is essentially the marketing operation of the Keiretsu
But provides
Links to financiers
Customer and product intelligence
11. 11 Management features - 1 Lifetime employment
Rigorous selection
Recession has caused changes
Temporary work
Short-term contracts
Job Rotation
Increases motivation
Makes workers more efficient
Gives full insight
12. 12 Management features - 2 Seniority based promotion
Strict hierarchical relationships
Decision making process (Ringi)
Nemawashi – sounding out at all levels
Ringi Seido – deliberations at same level
Just in Time (JIT)
Maximum efficiency
Cost reduction
Efficiency
Supplier relationships
13. 13 Management features - 3 Total Quality Control
Quality is built into every process
Inherent not external
Quality Circles
Groups of employees meet to identify and solve work-related problems
Provides –
Commitment
Sense of ownership
Improved communications
Motivation
14. 14 Management features - 4 Kaizen – “the key to competitive success”
Constant improvement
Customer oriented
Suggestion system
US import
Pervades all areas of work environment
Not just cost
15. 15 Are there downsides to Japanese management? Is productivity improvement the result of cost cutting?
Decision making processes impede creativity
Once performance improvement techniques are made public all companies adopt them
Japanese business culture is not transferable to western organisations
Attempts to impose some of the cultural expectations on workers in UK plants owned by Japanese companies can cause friction
16. 16 The dark side of Japanese management in the 1990s Christopher B Meek – 2004 Jrnl of Managerial Psychology
High commitment – low satisfaction
Increase in
Karoshi
Ijime
17. 17 Incidents of Karoshi in Meek (2004)
18. 18 Japanese worker job satisfaction Whitehill & Takezawa (1968)
asked about how central or important their commitment to their employer and their work was in comparison to other possible life priorities
Statement, “I think of my company as the central concern in my life and of greater importance than my personal life,”
9 percent of Japanese respondents agreed
1 percent of American respondents agreed
19. 19 Japanese worker job satisfaction Statement, “I think of the company as a part of my life at least equal in importance to my personal life,” 57 percent of Japanese respondents agreed
22 percent of American respondents agreed
only 8 percent of the Japanese agreed that they thought of their company as strictly a place to work and
separate from their personal life compared to 23 percent of the Americans
20. 20 Potential reasons Ganbatte – willingness to work hard & unceasingly under extreme conditions
Family oriented dependence – one looks to the family first for “comfort”
Socializing effect that the outside world is to be feared
The importance of not appearing foolish in front of others
Company in the role of “family” – lifetime employment
21. 21 Fatally Flawed Management? Did Japanese management work because economically Japan was working?
Incidents of karoshi and ijime increased at time of Japanese economic downturn
Greater pressure on management to get more from workers
Workers socialisation led them to accept…
To a point
Is western thought affecting worker conscience?
Are attitudes changing?
22. 22 Karoshi in context? 37 year old engineer died of a stroke at work in 1987 – quoted in Meek
My husband worked for an automobile company where his job was designing engines. For more than three years. . . he would leave home before 7 o’clock . . . and not return home until about 2:00 a.m. He worked on holidays as well . . .We got no workers’ compensation from the company whatsoever because, although he died at work, he died of stroke and the workers’ compensation applies only to cases of loss of limb while working with machines. Lately, when I think that if he hadn’t had to work so hard he would still be alive today and my children would still have their father, I can’t help but blame the company.
Seeing our children grow up without a father is too much for me to bear. Our eldest son said;
“Dad was stupid! He worked too hard all the time”
23. 23 The great management myth? Is Japanese management just a set of production techniques?
Is “management” in Japan simply an application of societal norms transferred to the substitute family (ie the workplace)?
24. 24 Interview with head of KenwoodEconomist March 2004 Mr Kawahara is quick to stress that there are some tasks at which Japanese firms excel.
Above all is a manufacturing philosophy that emphasises highly-trained workers, continuous efforts to eliminate defects, and lean production that minimises waste.
In Japan's high-growth years, this was a world beater, so the country's management shortcomings did not matter much.
Alas, he says, because of this success, business leaders "never needed to learn how to manage".
25. 25 The China Syndrome? If there was a Japanese management style that could work outside Japan
Where would it be?
China?
Increasing academic interest in Japanese manufacturing plants in China
26. 26 Early thoughts In “Japan’s Reluctant Multinationals” Trevor (1983) divided up Japanisation process into
hard and soft systems
Fukada’s (1995) study of transferability suggests some transfer of techniques taking place.
This looked at Japanese plants in China
27. 27 Taylor’s work - 1 Taylor (1999) studied production practices in Japanese manufacturing plants in China
Plants represent Japanese manufacturing practices to reasonable high degree
No common management practice
No overall pattern in 20 cases
We cannot meaningfully speak of Japanisation
Production methods are adapted – profitably - to local and parent company circumstances
28. 28 Taylor’s work - 2 Looking at personnel practice in Japanese firms in China - Taylor (2001)
The main findings were
despite claims of cultural similarity (!!) between China and Japan, personnel management practices were generally not transferred from Japan to the plants in China
practices that may appear as Japanese inspired were often informed by local practices
there was diversity in the forms of practices used, indicating neither sophistication nor a singular recipe of management methods
Hofstede scores
Individuality Ch 15 – Ja 46
Power Distance Ch 80 – Ja 54