1 / 17

DISH

DISH . D ata I nformation SH aring Steering Committee Meeting 1.31.08. Meeting Purpose. Update on Legal Workgroup activities & accomplishments Update on Technical Solution activities & accomplishments Update on Judicial User Group Activities Update on “Joint Article”

vinny
Download Presentation

DISH

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. DISH Data Information SHaring Steering Committee Meeting 1.31.08

  2. Meeting Purpose • Update on Legal Workgroup activities & accomplishments • Update on Technical Solution activities & accomplishments • Update on Judicial User Group Activities • Update on “Joint Article” • Update from Center For Policy Research

  3. Legal Work Group • Held work group session at Daniels Fund on 11/19, participants included: • 1 Magistrate • 3 IV-D Attorneys • State Department Staff • DISH Management Team • Weigh-ins from 3 other Magistrates

  4. Legal Work GroupAccomplishments & Decisions • Agreement reached on documents to be filed for APA , eliminated several documents • Discussed jurisdiction to hear parenting time issues in these case types – statutory authority • Left on table for further research/review: when to file interstate cases as Domestic or Juvenile • There may be some best business practices and educational information that can be shared as DISH goes live

  5. APA Docs • Diana/Tracy – This is a place holder for content you want to include related to decisions reached on what documents to file. • *Chris – do we really want to go over the list? Or is it enough to say – we have all gone over it & lgl has looked at it?

  6. Technical Feasibility & Solution • Conducted a series of joint technical solution & design sessions • 8 – 10 half day sessions • Management Team, CSE Technical, & Judicial Technical • Considered expanding project scope to reduce/eliminate paper filing with APA

  7. Benefits To Expanded Scope • Faster case establishment/eliminates time spent sorting through documents & entering data • Reduction/elimination of paper APA filing • One, less obvious benefit, is the increase in the level of trust between the two agencies. This trust is what is allowing a paperless exchange of data. • Eliminates duplicate data entry/errors

  8. Solutions Evaluated • PDF • Exchange PDF image of documents with data • Judicial creates paper on demand from images • E-Form • Exchange data and document templates • Judicial creates paper on demand from templates • Data Only • Exchange data necessary to establish/administer • Paper documents retained in CSE office

  9. PDF Solution • Pros: • Eliminates filing of many paper forms • Easy reproduction on demand • Cons: • Still must file some paper • Requires image repository • Process delayed by paper exchange

  10. E-form Solution • Pros: • Eliminates filing of many paper forms • No image repository required • Cons: • Still must file some paper • Process delayed by paper exchange • Complex implementation • Tight coupling between Judicial & CSE systems

  11. Data Only • Pros: • Eliminates filing of most (maybe all) paper forms • No image repository required • Process not delay by paper exchange • Achievable solution • Cons: • Significant process change • Change in responsibility & accountability • Paperless – Everyone must accept this

  12. Open Questions & Actions • How will Defaults be handled? • Need Judicial Directive for Pilot • May need legislative change for state-wide rollout • Will their be resistance to paperless solution? • Verification of filing – Who is responsible & how is this done?

  13. Technical Solution – Next Steps • Develop Schema for 1st web service • Clarify use of GJXDM/NIEM • Begin web service design/development • Establish necessary network connectivity • Begin individual system design • Continue data analysis & schema design for remaining web services • Revisit Default Order Scenario • Revise project plan and schedule

  14. Judicial User Group • Meeting Scheduled for February 13, 2008 • Work on what to do with all of the data Court receives • Provide some prototypes of screens, case initiation, judgments, support orders, etc. • Develop programming specifications

  15. Joint Article • Dan/Diana – Content Please • I think this should be handled by CPR – Dan • *Chris – Maureen is out of town – but I think she might know more about this

  16. CPR Update

More Related