1 / 62

Bridging the Gap for SIFE

Bridging the Gap for SIFE. Dr. Elaine C. Klein and Dr. Gita Martohardjono Research Institute for the Study of Language in Urban Society (RISLUS), CUNY Graduate Center Email: slal@gc.cuny.edu March 11, 2008. Who are SIFE?. Subgroup of English Language Learners (ELLs)

washi
Download Presentation

Bridging the Gap for SIFE

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Bridging the Gap for SIFE Dr. Elaine C. Klein and Dr. Gita Martohardjono Research Institute for the Study of Language in Urban Society (RISLUS), CUNY Graduate Center Email: slal@gc.cuny.edu March 11, 2008

  2. Who are SIFE? • Subgroup of English Language Learners (ELLs) • Recent arrivals to the US • Low literacy • Gaps in prior schooling (2 yrs +)

  3. Some Facts about ‘SIFE’ • Schools struggling to identify SIFE • Schools struggling to meet SIFE needs • SIFE graduation rates far lower than those of other ELLs

  4. Some Facts about ‘SIFE’in NYC Schools* • Approximately 15,000 “new” and existing SIFE comprise 11% of ELL population • Highest % of new SIFE enter 8th, 9th and 10th grades: Approximately 4700 in 2006-7. • SIFE evenly distributed in 4 boroughs • 59% of SIFE: Spanish native language *Bilingual Education Student Information Survey (BESIS) 2006-2007: NYC DOE Office of English Language Learners. 2007.

  5. SIFE-Related Research

  6. Short, Boyson, & Coltrane (2003) Examined selected “newcomer”programs nation-wide to“identify, document, analyze … effective program approaches to literacy development and assessment.”

  7. Short et al. Conclusions • “Many programs find that [the assessment instruments they use for SIFE] are inadequate…, particularly for those with no literacy skills in English.” • “…A relatively new and unresearched program option, … we have much more to learn about the most effective ways to deliver instruction…” [to SIFE].

  8. Additional Studies “adequate assessments are essential for gauging individual strengths and weaknesses…” August & Shanahan (2006) “[Develop] new and improved assessments of the adolescent ELLs’ native language abilities, English language development and content knowledge learning.” Short & Fitzsimmons (2007)

  9. Previous Research: SUMMARY • Inadequate Assessment • Inadequate Placement • Inadequate Instruction

  10. The SIFE Research ProjectPhase I: 2005-2006Phase II: 2006-2008

  11. Overall Goals • Characterize SIFE backgrounds • Assess SIFE academic competencies • Observe SIFE instructional settings • Track SIFE academic progress • Determine SIFE needs for HS graduation • Develop “pathway programs” to college • Make instructional recommendations

  12. Our Research Questions • How do we identify SIFE? • What are the characteristics of this population? • How do SIFE differ from other ELLs? • What academic competencies do SIFE bring to school in the US? • What are their native language (NL) literacy skills? • What is their academic knowledge? • What are the academic needs of SIFE?

  13. The SIFE Project: Phase IReview

  14. Overview of Method Participants: • 12 new SIFE in 9th grade • 2 high schools • Native language: Spanish Materials: • Batería III Woodcock Muñoz : Individual Assessment of Literacy and Content Knowledge • Questionnaire • Classroom Observations Methods: • Individual case studies • Group data

  15. Phase I: Summary of Results • Average Reading comprehension: 3rd grade • Average Math: 3rd – 4th grade • Average Science and Social Science: 1st – 2nd grade • Some students have no gaps in schooling • Students respond better in sheltered classes

  16. Phase I: Conclusions SIFE differ from other ELLs • In addition to mastery of English, SIFE need foundationalskills in their native language to take them to grade level: • Reading skills • Content area knowledge

  17. Phase I: Recommendations • Use SIFE diagnostics system-wide • Include“gaps in NL foundational skills” • Increase native language support • Provide intensive ESL from beginning • Use sheltered classes

  18. The SIFE Project: Phase IIIn Progress

  19. Current Research Plan 18 month Longitudinal Study Participants: • 103 students identified as SIFE • 9th and 10th grade • Native language: Spanish Schools: • 5 NYC high schools • Varying types of programs and instruction

  20. Data Collection • Quantitative: • Intake and exit questionnaire (Spanish) • Versant (Oral Spanish and English) • Basic Syntax Comprehension (Spanish and English typical language development) • Diagnostics (Spanish and English reading and content) • Benchmark comparisons (State and city-mandated tests) • Qualitative: • Classroom observations • Teacher and student interviews • Student work samples

  21. Oral Questionnaire Intake • Personal and Language Information • Family and Home Background • Education History • Language and Literacy Practices • Transition to School in US Exit • Experience in School

  22. Questionnaire Results: Gaps in Schooling

  23. Questionnaire Results: Goals and Aspirations

  24. Other Questionnaire Results • Most are from the Dominican Republic, Mexico or Honduras. • Most live in the U.S. with only one parent and have family members in their country of origin. • Most report high school as highest level of education among family members in U.S.

  25. Language, Literacy and Content

  26. Oral Language: Versant • Measures • Vocabulary • Sentence Mastery • Fluency • Examples: repetition of sentences, story recall, answering questions

  27. Versant Results by Component Overall Mean % Correct = 79, SD = 16

  28. Basic Syntax Comprehension • Sentence: The bear tells the monkey to dance, and he does. • Oración:El oso le ordena al mono bailar, y así lo hace. Mean % Correct = 89, SD = 12

  29. Literacy and Content Diagnostic Cumulative assessment from 1st to 7th grade • Basic literacy • Word level reading • Literacy • Language, vocabulary and reading comprehension • Math • Procedures and problem solving • Science and Social Science NOTE: Items carefully selected for appropriateness

  30. Basic Literacy Results First Grade • Phonological & Orthographic Awareness • Word Reading • Simple Sentence Comprehension Mean % Correct = 96, SD = 4.5

  31. Language Components • Language Mechanics • Capitalization • Usage • Punctuation • Language Expression • Sentence Structure • Prewriting • Content and Organization

  32. Language Example Grade level 4: Language mechanics - usage

  33. Results: Language

  34. Reading Vocabulary • Synonyms - recognize a synonym for a printed word • Multiple-meaning words - determine the meaning of words with multiple meanings in a given context • Context Clues - use context clues to assign meaning to an unknown word

  35. Reading Vocabulary Example Grade 4: Context Clues

  36. Results: Reading Vocabulary

  37. Reading Comprehension • Basic Understanding: • Recall factual information • Identify relevance • Thinking Skills (Inferencing): • Analysis and synthesis • Classification and sequencing • Comparison and contrast • Cause and effect, fact and opinion, implied relevance • Conclusions, predictions, and hypotheses

  38. Reading Comprehension: Excerpt from 5th Grade Passage

  39. Reading Comprehension Example Grade Level 5: Thinking Skills

  40. Results: Reading Comprehension

  41. Reading Vocabulary – Reading Comprehension Relationship  significant positive correlation between reading vocabulary and reading comprehension r = .578, p < .001

  42. Results: Content Areas

  43. Results: Math

  44. Results: Science

  45. Results: Social Science

  46. Summary of Diagnostics LITERACY • Students seem to have word level reading skills BUT are not at grade level in higher level reading skills: • Typical reading vocabulary level: 5th – 7th grade • Typical reading comprehension level: 3rd grade

  47. Summary of Diagnostics CONTENT • Students Lack Academic Content Knowledge • Typical math level: 3rd grade and below • Typical science level: below lowest grade tested • Typical social science: below lowest grade tested

  48. Correlation between length of gap and total score

  49. Range of Performance for Students with No Gap in Schooling

  50. Comparison Groups • Native English Speaker Groups: • 9th and 10th Graders • Community College West Indian English and AAVE speakers • Regular ELLs Group: • 9th-12th Graders • Spanish-English Bilingual Group: • “Pathway Program” in a Community College

More Related