1 / 55

The WWRP Polar Prediction Project

The WWRP Polar Prediction Project. Thomas Jung (chair) Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research October 2012. Outline. Background Steering group Mission statement Research goals Year of Polar Prediction Recent developments Outlook International context Summary.

wcharles
Download Presentation

The WWRP Polar Prediction Project

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The WWRP Polar Prediction Project Thomas Jung (chair) Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research October 2012

  2. Outline • Background • Steering group • Mission statement • Research goals • Year of Polar Prediction • Recent developments • Outlook • International context • Summary

  3. Background • November 2009: CAS recommended establishment of an IPY legacy project • October 2010: WWRP workshop held in Norway • September 2011: THORPEX ICSC endorsed polar prediction project • September 2011: Formation of a steering group

  4. WWRP-PPP Steering Group SG2, Montreal, 27-28. March 2012 • Thomas Jung (chair) • Peter Bauer • Chris Fairall • David Bromwich • Trond Iversen • Marika Holland • Brian Mills • Pertti Nurmi • Ian Renfrew • Gregory Smith • Gunilla Svensson • Mikhail Tolstykh • Paco Doblas Reyes (ex-officio) • Peter Lemke (ex-officio) • Neil Gordon (WMO consultant)

  5. Background • November 2009: CAS recommended establishment of an IPY legacy project • October 2010: WWRP workshop held in Norway • September 2011: THORPEX ICSC endorsed polar prediction project • September 2011: Formation of a steering group • December 2011: 1st SG meeting (discussion of implementation plan) • March 2012: 2nd SG meeting (review of draft implementation/science plan)

  6. Draft Implementation Plan

  7. Mission Statement „Promote cooperative international research enabling development of improved weather and environmental prediction services for the polar regions, on time scales from hourly to seasonal“ An important addition: „This constitutes the hourly to seasonal research component of the WMO Global Integrated Polar Prediction System (GIPPS)“

  8. Research Areas Services Societal and Economic Research Applications (SERA) Verification Underpinning research Predictability and Diagnostics Teleconnections Forecasting system development Observations Modelling Data Assimilation Ensemble Forecasting

  9. Verification of ensemble forecasts in the Arctic Jung and Leutbecher (2007)

  10. Mean temperature tendencies Tropics: Sea points Arctic: Sea and sea ice points • ECMWF model • 6-hourly initial tendencies • 120 forecasts (DJF 1989-2010) Figure courtesy of S. Serrar (AWI)

  11. Temperature tendencies: Stdev Tropics: Sea points Arctic: Sea and sea ice points Figure courtesy of S. Serrar (AWI)

  12. Role of Sea Ice in Medium-Range Weather Forecasting T2m Difference: Observed Minus Persisted Sea Ice Figure courtesy of P. Bauer (ECMWF)

  13. Year of Polar Prediction (YOPP) Aim: Intensive observational and modelling period to advance polar prediction capabilities. This will be augmented by research into forecast-stakeholder interaction, verification and a strong educational component Important: Needs to be aligned with other (planned) activities such as MOSAiC.

  14. YOPP: Time line

  15. Preparation phase

  16. Year of Polar Prediction

  17. Consolidation phase

  18. Other Activities • Polar prediction flyer

  19. Other Activities • Polar prediction brochure • Presentations (a total of 12 since December 2012) • Education and outreach: team up with APECS

  20. Outlook (selected)

  21. International context

  22. Linkages with WCRP • Background: • WWRP: Sufficiently similar to have a joint project • WCRP: Sufficiently different to have a joint project • Some truths in both statements • Observing systems, model development, ensemble methods etc. • Weather forecasting vs. regional sea level change projections • We need to find a plausible way to ensure coordination!

  23. The Global Integrated Polar Prediction System (GIPPS) • Has been proposed by EC-PORS • Global: International effort and poles have global influence on systems (weather, climate, biological...) • Integrated: Reflects interconnections between system and the System itself will be integrated (research, observations and services) • Approved by Cg-XVI in 2011

  24. The three components of GIPPS Options: • Mergeintooneproject • Develop a strategythatensurescoordination: International Coordination Office, jointexpert groups etc.

  25. Summary • WWRP Polar Prediction Project well on course • Steering group has been formed • Draft implementation plan has been developed • PPP has been presented at many occasions • Major issues • Trust fund • Collaboration with WCRP • Approach funding agencies • Make sure that what has been written in the plans will be delivered...

  26. Thank you!

  27. Strategies to Achieve Research Goals • Develop strong linkages with other initiatives • Strengthen linkages between academia, research institutions and operational prediction centres • Establish linkages with space agencies and other data providers • Establish and exploit special research data sets • Promote interactions and collaboration between research and stakeholders • Foster education and outreach

  28. SERA Goal: Understand and evaluate the use of enhanced prediction information and services in polar regions • Link with forecast user community (two-way) • Communication of risk, opportunity and uncertainty across user types • Estimation and analysis of historic and current use • Develop/test framework to define and assess expected polar and lower-latitude benefits in relation to cost • Monitor/evaluate actual decision-making behaviour, costs and benefits

  29. Verification Goal: Establishandapplyverificationmethodsappropriatefor polar regions • Verify existing forecasting systems in the polar regions • Develop key performance headline measures with polar relevance to monitor progress • Devise methods that can be used to verify user-relevant key weather and climate phenomena in polar regions (e.g. blizzards and fog-visibility) • Define an observation strategy to meet forecast verification requirements • Develop forecast verification in observation space using, for example, satellite data simulators

  30. Predictability and Diagnostics Goal: Determinepredictabilityandidentifykeysourcesofforecasterrors in polar regions • Determine • Mechanisms providing predictability • Instabilities of the polar climate system • Structure of imperfections (analysis and model error) • Apply/develop diagnostic techiques that help to understand model error at the process level • Central: Explore the role of sea ice (time scales from days to seasonal)

  31. Background • November 2009: CAS recommended establishment of an IPY legacy project • October 2010: WWRP workshop held in Norway • September 2011: THORPEX ICSC endorsed polar prediction project • September 2011: Formation of a steering group • December 2011: 1st SG meeting (discussion of implementation plan) • March 2012: 2nd SG meeting (review of draft implementation/science plan) • June 2012: Polar prediction project is approved by EC-64

  32. International Collaboration • Forecasting brings together different communities! • Consultation on the Implementation Plan will increase collaboration • Cross-membership (e.g. WWRP-PPP and EC-PORS) • Incentives • YOPP • Special data sets (establishment and use) • Workshops, conference meetings and summer schools • International project office (AWI happy to host!)

  33. Strengthening Linkages Between Academia, Research Institutions and Operational Centres • Modify funding schemes following UK, USA and Canadian examples (e.g. researchers are required to spend time at operational centres) • Provision of computing time, experimental support and special data sets by operational centres • Ensure continual near-real-time availability (e.g. GTS) of future operational and experimental campaign observations • Committee work

  34. Establish and Exploit Special Research Data Sets • Inventory of existing data sets: TIGGE, YOTC, reforecasts, DEMETER, Athena etc. • Formulate special requirements and devise special experiments together with other working groups (e.g. WGNE and SG Subseasonal and Seasonal Prediction) • Limited value from case studies! • Need for long sustainable, openly accessible data sets • High-resolution reanalysis

  35. Others Strategic Issues • Write BAMS paper about WWRP Polar Prediction Project • Prepare WWRP-PPP brochure for funding agencies and stakeholders • Linkages with space agencies and data providers • Liaise with WMO Polar Space Task Group • Promote interaction and communication between researchers and stakeholders • Identification of stakeholders: NMHS, Arctic Council, private sector companies etc. • Organize meetings to bring communities together • Education and outreach (collaboration with APECS)

  36. Implementation Plan • Table of Contents • Introduction • Mission statement • Benefits • Research Plan Goals • Societaland Research Applications (SERA) • Verification • PredictabilityandDiagnostics • Teleconnections • Modelling • Ensemble Forecasting • Data Assimilation • Observations • Year of Polar Prediction (YOPP) • StrategiestoAchievethe Goals • DevelopandMaintain Strong Linkageswith Other Initiatives • StrengthenLinkagesBetweenAcademia, Research Institutionsand Operational Centres • EstablishLinkageswith Space Agenciesand Other Data Providers • EstablishandExploits Special Research Data Sets • Promote Interaction andCollaborationBetween Research andStakeholders • Foster Education andOutreach • Implementation Schedule • ...

  37. Mean T Ensemble Forecast Spread Ensemble Spread RMS An Increment 200 hPa 1000 hPa Figure courtesy of P. Bauer (ECMWF)

  38. WWRP-PPP Steering Group • Thomas Jung (chair) • Peter Bauer • Chris Fairall • David Bromwich • Trond Iversen • Marika Holland • Brian Mills • Pertti Nurmi • Ian Renfew • Gregory Smith • Gunilla Svensson • Mikhail Tolstykh • Paco Doblas Reyes (ex-officio) • Peter Lemke (ex-officio) • Neil Gordon (WMO consultant)

  39. Implementation Plan • Table of Contents • Executive Summary • Introduction • Mission statement • Benefits • Research Plan Goals • Societaland Research Applications (SERA) • Verification • PredictabilityandDiagnostics • Teleconnections • Modelling • Ensemble Forecasting • Data Assimilation • Observations • Year of Polar Prediction (YOPP) • StrategiestoAchievethe Goals • DevelopandMaintain Strong Linkageswith Other Initiatives • StrengthenLinkagesBetweenAcademia, Research Institutionsand Operational Centres • EstablishLinkageswith Space Agenciesand Other Data Providers • EstablishandExploits Special Research Data Sets • Promote Interaction andCollaborationBetween Research andStakeholders • Foster Education andOutreach • Implementation Schedule • ...

  40. Deterministic Skill: Z500 Arctic Jung and Leutbecher (2007)

  41. International Collaboration

  42. Benefit Areas

  43. Benefit Areas (cont‘d) Jung et al. (2010)

  44. Stochastic Sea Ice Parametrizations Ensemble Spread Interannual variability Juricke et al., in preparation

  45. New TIGGE Products (cont‘d) 60S-90S Figure courtesy of Mio Matsueda (Oxford)

  46. Topograhic Jets and Resolution Jung and Rhines (2007)

  47. Deterministic Skill: Z500 Antarctic Jung and Leutbecher (2007)

  48. Importance of sea ice forecasts

  49. Scale dependent predictability Figure courtesy of A. Simmons (ECMWF)

  50. Oceanic response to high-resolution atmospheric forcing Eden and Jung (2006)

More Related