1 / 35

Operational Verification at HNMS

Operational Verification at HNMS. Flora Gofa. WG5 COSMO General Meeting, Moscow 2010. Operational Use of VERSUS since August 2009 for most verification activities at HNMS Forecast models COSMOGR 7 & 3km ECMWF model COSMO ensemble (SREPS) Verification Standard Conditional Cross model

wilson
Download Presentation

Operational Verification at HNMS

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Operational Verification at HNMS Flora Gofa WG5 COSMO General Meeting, Moscow 2010

  2. Operational Use of VERSUS since August 2009 for most verification activities at HNMS Forecast models COSMOGR 7 & 3km ECMWF model COSMO ensemble (SREPS) Verification Standard Conditional Cross model WDV Not yet in use Upper air verification 00 &12 UTC WG5 COSMO General Meeting, Moscow 2010

  3. Add COSMOGR and high res graph… COSMOGRhr: 0.02deg COSMOGR: 0.0625deg COSMOGR Grid Area WG5 COSMO General Meeting, Moscow 2010

  4. WG5 COSMO General Meeting, Moscow 2010

  5. Temp 2m - 7km vs 3km Fall Winter Spring Summer Underestimation of Temp, mainly in winter error 2-2.5 deg, worse with 7km by 0.5 Clear diurnal cycle WG5 COSMO General Meeting, Moscow 2010

  6. Wind Speed - 7km vs 3km Fall Winter Spring Summer Overestimation of wind (00,24), less in summer 2-2.5deg bias, higher in winter similar attitude of 2 models WG5 COSMO General Meeting, Moscow 2010

  7. 2m Temp WINTER Wind Speed Underestimation of Temp during midday hours, overetimation of wind, large error in analysis field WG5 COSMO General Meeting, Moscow 2010

  8. 2m Temp Wind Speed SUMMER WG5 COSMO General Meeting, Moscow 2010

  9. DewP Temp - 7km vs 3km Fall Winter Spring Summer Underestimation of DewT Bias 2.5-3deg, lower in the winter WG5 COSMO General Meeting, Moscow 2010

  10. Cloud Cover - 7km vs 3km Fall Winter Spring Summer Similar error for all seasons but summer and for both models WG5 COSMO General Meeting, Moscow 2010

  11. 12h Precipitation - 7km vs 3km FALL 70-80% POD , above 50% up to 2mm, drops fast after Higher FAR for HR model WG5 COSMO General Meeting, Moscow 2010

  12. 12h Precipitation - 7km vs 3km WINTER Lower FAR in the winter for both models WG5 COSMO General Meeting, Moscow 2010

  13. 12h Precipitation - 7km vs 3km FALL Slight overestimation for lower thresholds <0.5 SImilar ETS for both models WG5 COSMO General Meeting, Moscow 2010

  14. 12h Precipitation - 7km vs 3km WINTER WG5 COSMO General Meeting, Moscow 2010

  15. Change in Point Selection Method 3D optimized 30km radius Higher POD for radius but also higher FAR ? WG5 COSMO General Meeting, Moscow 2010

  16. Change in Point Selection Method 3D optimized 30km radius Overestimation of small amount of rain with rdius method Similar ETS

  17. WAM Conditional Verification Extracting information for relevant performance of weather parameters The input from modelers and forecasters is necessary for identifying and testing hypotheses. WG5 COSMO General Meeting, Moscow 2010

  18. Temp in overcast conditions Fall Winter Spring Summer

  19. Temp in clear sky conditions Fall Winter Spring Summer

  20. Temp in ‘calm’ conditions Fall Winter Spring Summer WG5 COSMO General Meeting, Moscow 2010

  21. Temp in ‘high wind’ conditions Fall Winter Spring Summer WG5 COSMO General Meeting, Moscow 2010

  22. Cross Model COSMOGR-ECMWF Annual Temp DP Temp Wind Sp MSLP RMSE lower for COSMO - Temp and wind, higher for MSLP and same for DewP Both underestimate Temp COSMO undersetimate DewP WG5 COSMO General Meeting, Moscow 2010

  23. 12h Precipitation – Annual ECMWF COSMO Higher POD and FAR for ECMWF for all seasons WG5 COSMO General Meeting, Moscow 2010

  24. 12h Precipitation – Annual ECMWF COSMO Really strong overestimation of lower preci amounts up to 3mm and lower ETS scores for ECMWF WG5 COSMO General Meeting, Moscow 2010

  25. EPS verification Deterministic approach

  26. Post-processed Products Verification Kalman filtering is applied operationally to NWPs at the nearest model location: 2m maximum and minimum temperature forecasts Statistical analysis of maximum and minimum values of these parameters (both modeled and filtered) WG5 COSMO General Meeting, Moscow 2010

  27. WAM WAM WAM Wave Atmospheric Model Driven by COSMOGR (7km) output Verification of wave height/direction Future plans: to be done through VERSUS WG5 COSMO General Meeting, Moscow 2010

  28. Thank you!

  29. Additional Slides WG5 COSMO General Meeting, Moscow 2010

  30. MSLP >mean Fall Winter Spring Summer

  31. MSLP <mean Fall Winter Spring Summer

  32. 6h Precipitation COSMOGR

  33. 24h Precipitation COSMOGR

  34. Temp in high wind conditions Fall Winter Spring Summer WG5 COSMO General Meeting, Moscow 2010

  35. 12h Precipitation with respect to MSLP WAM WG5 COSMO General Meeting, Moscow 2010

More Related