440 likes | 622 Views
Regional Training Course on State Systems of Accounting for and Control of Nuclear Material for States in the Middle East with Limited Nuclear Material and Activities Amman, Jordan, 17 to 21 January 2010. Session 3.1 Overview of the Additional Protocol . M. Derrough
E N D
Regional Training Course on State Systems of Accounting for and Control of Nuclear Material for States in the Middle East with Limited Nuclear Material and Activities Amman, Jordan, 17 to 21 January 2010 Session 3.1Overview of the Additional Protocol M. Derrough Senior Inspector, Division of Operations B
Session Outline • Limitations under CSAs • The Additional Protocol • Information on mines and concentration plants • Information on imports/exports • Information on future plans
Objective of Safeguards Provide Assurances on the Correctness and Completeness of a State’s nuclear material declarations
What kind of assurances? Under a CSA alone, only credible assurance of the non-diversion of declared nuclear material can be provided More information and access is required to provide credible assurance of the absence of undeclared nuclear material and activities for a State as a whole
Some of the limitations under CSAs • Focuses on declared materials at strategic points in declared facilities (access limited) • Covers only partially the nuclear fuel cycle • No assurances of absence of undeclared nuclear material and facilities (completeness)
Political changes in 1990-1995 • Dissolution of the former Soviet Union • South Africa’s destruction of its nuclear weapons and accession to the NPT • Discovery of Iraq’s clandestine nuclear programme • DPRK • Indefinite extension of NPT
IAEA Board of Governors (March 1995) “…the safeguards system for implementing comprehensive safeguards agreements should be designed to provide for verification by the Agency of thecorrectness andcompleteness of States’ declarations, so that there is credible assurance of the non-diversion of nuclear material from declared activities and of the absence of undeclared nuclear activities”
Strengthening Programme June 1995Programme 93+2 measures divided into Part I (within existing authority) and Part II (new authority needed) June 1996An open-ended committee of the Board (Committee 24) was established to negotiate the legal instrument for additional authority
The Model Additional Protocol • New legal instrument approved by Board of Governors in May 1997 (INFCIRC/540) • Concluded by States on a voluntary basis; becomes part of a State’s safeguards agreement
Objective Provide the IAEA with better tools for verifying the correctness and completeness of States’ declarations
Measures of the additional protocol • State’s provision of extended declaration • Inspector’s broader access rights • Better administrative arrangements, e.g. visas
Waste Storage Waste Storage Coverage under a CSA CSA
Waste Storage Waste Storage Expanded coverage with an AP CSA AP
Extended declaration on nuclear material • Domestically produced source material • Imports/exports of source material for non-nuclear purposes • Locations and uses of exempted material • Waste containing terminated nuclear material
Extended declaration on nuclear-related facilities and activities • Co-located nuclear infrastructure • Other locations where nuclear material is located (mines/exempted/terminated) • Nuclear-related research and development not involving nuclear material • Nuclear-related equipment and non-nuclear material • State’s future plans
Example RBA, RURITANIA 1 APRIL 2001 (Training Map – Artificial Information)
Broader access rights • All places in nuclear installations or on sites • All other places where nuclear material is located • Decommissioned facilities • Some locations where nuclear-related activities are conducted • Other locations, under certain circumstances
Better administrative arrangements • Simpler inspector designation • No visas or multi-year multiple entry visas • Modern communications capabilities
Information on mines and concentration plants
Mining U and Th naturally occurring Uniformly distributed on Earth in rock forming minerals, sands Various techniques: Open Pit Underground In-situ leach Tails reworking 22
Open Pit Mine Arlit mine, Niger 23
Underground Mine Shaft head frame at Dolní Rožínka, Czech Republic Underground at MacArthur River, Canada 24
In-situ Leach Yellowcake drying and packaging Reagent Supplies * Thickeners Control room Uranium Extraction Evaporation ponds Well house Recovery well Upper Aquifer Impermeable Zone Mineralized Aquifer Impermeable Zone Monitoring wells Injection well Uranium deposit * Acid or alkaline depending on chemistry of Uranium layers 25
Safeguards activities are currently limited Nuclear material accountancy is not applied to uranium ore concentrates (UOC) but exports are reported Mine and mills sites annual production are declared under an additional protocol. Reporting of mining materials and activities
Location, operational status, and production capacity Approximate annual production for the State as a whole Annual production for individual mines or plants if requested by the Agency Information required under Article 2.a.(v)
Information on imports / exports
Information required under Article 2.a.(ix) - Exports of Annex II Items • Annex II lists “nuclear use” equipment and non-nuclear material in 7 major categories • Information required about the identity, quantity, location of intended use for each export of Annex II equipment or material • Agency may request confirmation by importing State • Reporting on a quarterly basis
Information on State’s future plans
Information required under Article 2.a.(x) - Fuel Cycle Plans Information required: • Government approved plans for nuclear fuel cycle • Fuel cycle R&D specifically included • For next 10-years
The Additional Protocol is an integral part of the strengthened safeguards system • The Additional Protocol increases Agency’s ability to detect and deter undeclared nuclear material or activities
The tools of additional protocol allows the Agency to draw conclusions on the absence of undeclared nuclear material and activities, a pre-requisite for the implementation of integrated safeguards • Close cooperation with SSACs is necessary