1 / 1

Improving Severe Weather Forecasting: Hyperspectral IR Data and Low-level Inversions

Improving Severe Weather Forecasting: Hyperspectral IR Data and Low-level Inversions. June 07, 2005 Case Study. Future Work. Justin M. Sieglaff Cooperative Institute for Meteorological Satellite Studies (CIMSS) Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences University of Wisconsin - Madison

yahto
Download Presentation

Improving Severe Weather Forecasting: Hyperspectral IR Data and Low-level Inversions

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Improving Severe Weather Forecasting: Hyperspectral IR Data and Low-level Inversions June 07, 2005 Case Study Future Work Justin M. Sieglaff Cooperative Institute for Meteorological Satellite Studies (CIMSS) Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences University of Wisconsin - Madison Timothy J. Schmit NOAA/NESDIS, SaTellite Applications and Research (STAR) Advanced Satellite Products Branch (ASPB) Steven A. Ackerman Cooperative Institute for Meteorological Satellite Studies (CIMSS) Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences University of Wisconsin - Madison • Future work includes using higher resolution • AIRS forward model for radiances • Development of methodology for detecting • and monitoring lower tropospheric inversions • in simulated and observed radiances, • however this is complicated by need for • retrieved skin temperature • Below is simulated spectra for the same • profile, but varied skin temperature • Differences between ‘window regions’ and • ‘absorption features’ (circled) have different • sign depending on skin temperature • Methodology will need to account for • differences imparted by skin temperature, as • well as moisture profile • Excerpt from watch number 425: • “…CAP IS WEAKENING RAPIDLY WITH • HEATING ACROSS CENTRAL WI WITH • MLCAPE APPROACHING 1000 J/KG. RUC • MODEL SOUNDINGS ACROSS CENTRAL • WI HAVE BEEN SHOWING STEEP LOW/MID • LEVEL LAPSE RATES NEARING 8C/KM • INDICATING AN INCREASING THREAT FOR • DAMAGING WINDS AND HAIL. …” Thanks also to… Wayne Feltz, CIMSS Bob Rabin, NSSL/CIMSS Jun Li, CIMSS Jinglong Li, CIMSS Michael Morgan, UW Jim Nelson, CIMSS Gene Brusky, NWSFO GRB KCWA Research Motivation • Goal: Determine how hyperspectral IR data • can be used to detect lower tropospheric • inversions and use this information to • increase probability of detection AND • decrease false alarm rate of severe weather • events • TAMDAR aircraft can provide high vertical • resolution profile data; these profiles greatly • aid in short term convection forecasts • TAMDAR profiles limited spatially to • regional airports and temporally to hours • when flights operate; hyperspectral IR • data can be used to provide high vertical • resolution atmospheric soundings with • increased spatial and temporal coverage over • aircraft data • TAMDAR/Hyperspectral IR data can in part be • used to improve short term convection forecasts, • especially when numerical models do not • accurately capture state of the atmosphere • Hyperspectral data such as AIRS/HES • can improve capabilities over broadband data, • like the current GOES sounder • Calculated and AIRS observed spectra for KCWA • ~1900UTC (Note: AIRS observation is for nearby • clear AIRS pixel due to clouds over KCWA) • Note agreement between calculations and AIRS • observation – confident in simulated datasets • However, TAMDAR (green) shows the temperature • inversion near 900 hPa, while the RUC (blue) • inaccurately dissipated the inversion • MCS dissipated as it entered WW #425 and watch • was eventually cancelled 2005 06 07 1850 UTC AIRS Granule 872 cm-1 (11.5 µm) October 04, 2002 Retrieval • Brightness temperature difference for two • simulated TBB spectra for the inversion noted • in the June 7,2005 case GOES-12 B6 286.9 K GOES-12 B8 294.4K GOES-12 B7 291.7K CART SITE Select References • Observed AIRS spectra for CART site, observed • temperature and moisture profiles, and retrieved • temperature and moisture profiles • CIMSS/AIRS experimental retrieval (hyperspectral) • detects inversion near 850 hPa, while current • GOES sounder (broadband) fails to • capture inversion The Utility of TAMDAR Regional Aircraft Sounding Data in Short-term Convective Forecasting, Eugene S. Brusky, NOAA/NWS, Green Bay, WI; and P. Kurimski, 10th Symposium on Integrated Observing and Assimilation Systems for the Atmosphere, Oceans, and Land Surface (IOAS-AOLS), February 2006 AirDat System for Ensuring TAMDAR Data Quality, Alan K. Anderson, 10th Symposium on Integrated Observing and Assimilation Systems for the Atmosphere, Oceans, and Land Surface (IOAS-AOLS), February 2006 AIRS Subpixel Cloud Characterization Using MODIS Cloud Products, Jun Li, Et. Al., Journal of Applied Meteorology, August 2004 • Hyperspectral (HES) ΔT for this simulation • is larger than HES/PORD NEDT (black line) 2002 10 04 1945 UTC AIRS Granule 872 cm-1 (11.5 µm)

More Related