1 / 26

Self (social) Destruction in an Intentional Community

Self (social) Destruction in an Intentional Community. Social Control Mills College Fall 2009. The Book and Author. Quakers. http://ushistoryimages.com/images/quakers/fullsize/quakers-3.jpg. Who Were the Puritans?.

yamka
Download Presentation

Self (social) Destruction in an Intentional Community

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Self (social) Destruction in an Intentional Community Social Control Mills College Fall 2009

  2. The Book and Author

  3. Quakers http://ushistoryimages.com/images/quakers/fullsize/quakers-3.jpg

  4. Who Were the Puritans? • In post reformation England, protestants who felt that Church of England remained “too Catholic” • Wanted to replace “episcopacy” with “congregationalism” • Fundamental tension: a movement that stressed individual, non-centralized approach • Predestination. Duty of constant reform, attention to detail, avoidance of sin.

  5. Puritan Houses http://media.photobucket.com/image/puritans%20quakers%20%20massachusetts%20bay/maggie6138/villagehouses.jpg

  6. Puritan Worship http://amhist.ist.unomaha.edu/module_files/Puritan%20Worship%20Service.jpg

  7. Where Did They Come From?

  8. http://www.ratical.org/many_worlds/6Nations/EoL/fig7.gif

  9. Puritan Punishment http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/ATHEISM/puritans.jpg

  10. A Case is a Case of Many Somethings 17th c. fringe grps. “moral panics” intentional communities exile communities sociology of boundaries religion & control* cults * Taliban?

  11. Law and Authority in Massachusetts Bay • Pp 54ff • Charted as business company • Origins in protest, how to transform into loyalty? • Ragtag collection of legal ideas + BIBLE • Bible • Orthodoxy vs. congregational independence

  12. The Devil and Who I Am It is quite natural, then, that they would seek new frames of reference to help them remember who they were; and just as natural that they would begin to look with increasing apprehension at the activities of the Devil. One of the surest ways to confirm an identity, for communities as well as for individuals, is to find some way of measuring what one is not. …for [the devil] had always loomed in Puritan imagery as a dark adversary against which people could test the edge of their own sainthood. (64)

  13. Puritans as A CASE OF WHAT? • “intentional community” • Structure/beliefs highly aligned • Exile community • Cult • Protestantism • Voluntary exiles • 17th century fringe groups

  14. Shape of the Book Deviance is relative. Crime is normal. Communities are about their boundaries. • On the Sociology of Deviance • The Puritans of Massachusetts Bay • The Shapes of the Devil • Stabilities &Instabilities in Puritan Crime Rates • Puritanism and Deviancy A utopian society in which civil rules and moral beliefs would be aligned. A community threatened by its own ideas (1) God’s > man, (2) let us do our thing, (3) the devil is real Social control takes time and energy and so community only gets as much deviation as it can afford to police

  15. Corruption! General Trajectory “They” not living up to “the” standards. Need to purify. people vs. church? Catholic Churchgodchurchperson Calvin, Luthergodperson Not serious about change! village vs. state? Puritans in Englandlocal control Protestants/Anglicanshierarchy/centralization Whence authority? young vs. old 1st Gen Puritans in Mass.church leaders = community leaders Antinomiansauthorityideas/book/inspiration Oh No! Immigrants! inside vs outside Quakersreligion really private 2nd Gen Puritans in Massthere goes the community They are inside of us! old vs. young Devil = Overly Mystical? 3rd Gen Puritans in Mass.No outside threat? Invent one!

  16. Claims • crime (or rather the reaction to it) concentrates the consciousnesses of community members on what it means to be in/of this community • unless “the rhythm of group life is punctuated by moments of deviant behavior…social organization would be impossible.” (Erikson):

  17. Attending to Deviance…Creates “fellow feeling” • Recognizing and reacting to deviation • …as collective… • …provides an opportunity for separate individuals… • …to merge their personal sentiments… • …and experience group solidarity.

  18. Even in a society of angels

  19. It does not offend the collective because it is a crime; it is a crime because it offends the collective…

  20. Chapter 1: All the Sociology You Need • Boundaries

  21. Contradictory Social Forces

  22. Under “Acceptable” Over “Acceptable” Different All Behavior Varies and Groups Have a Collective Sense of “How we do it” • Two possibilities

  23. All Behavior Varies and Groups Have a Collective Sense of “How we do it” Another way to look at it… US US THEM THEM THEM

  24. Exercise: Values and Social Control Select from the list below an issue that is important to you. Sexism Racism Homophobia Ecology Energy Food (vegan, etc. or eathingdisorders) Smoking Child rearing practices Drinking Drugs Let's say you and your comrades decide it's time to get serious about this issue. Your task is to describe a "puritan-esque" approach to this issue in a community like Mills. You decide you will start a "hall" or "house" around this issue. Form a group and either split into "boosters" and "devil's advocates" (or skeptics) or decide that you'll rotate these roles. • Describe the basic values, purpose, etc. of your group/organization. Do the values of the organization suggest anything about how it should be run? • Try to identify who can join the group/movement. Should there be any restrictions? Who should decide? How will you tell who "fits"? • Episode I : Who is qualified to speak as an expert within the group? Do some people have more credibility than others? • Episode II: One of the following events occurs • A campus event/issue arises and your group is called upon to coalition with another. • Tensions with a similar but different group/movement. • You decide to work with a professor to create an academic class on the topic. By analogy to Erikson, what are some things you might expect to see? • Episode III : The impure among us need to be found and purged. What happens?

More Related