1 / 24

Phytic acid, mineral cations and phytase interactions

Phytic acid, mineral cations and phytase interactions. Roselina Angel – University of Maryland Todd Applegate – Purdue University. Phytic Acid. Fe. Zn. Protein. Ca. Starch. Protein. Cu. P C H O.

zohar
Download Presentation

Phytic acid, mineral cations and phytase interactions

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Phytic acid, mineral cations and phytase interactions Roselina Angel – University of MarylandTodd Applegate – Purdue University

  2. Phytic Acid Fe Zn Protein Ca Starch Protein Cu P C H O

  3. Cation “Impairment” of P hydrolysisvs.Cation “release” capacity of phytase

  4. Background • Mineral inhibition of phytase • Maenz et al. (1999) • Zn2+> > Fe2+ >Mn2+ >Fe3+ >Ca2+ >Mg2+ • Soluble Ca - chelate at 1 mM Ca : 10 mM phytate • Soluble Zn - chelate at equal concentrations Zn : phytate • Mineral complex stability • Vohra et al. (1965) • Cu2+>Zn2+ >Ni2+ >Co2+ >Mn2+ >Fe3+ >Ca2+ • Maddaiah et al. (1964) • Zn2+>Cu2+ >Co2+ >Mn2+ >Ca2+ • At the same pH

  5. Cation Inhibition of Phytate Hydrolysis* Maenz et al., 1999 * mM mineral conc. for 50% inhibition

  6. Cation Inhibition of Phytate Hydrolysis* Maenz et al., 1999 * mM mineral conc. for 50% inhibition

  7. 2 mmol Phytic Acid + 30 mmol Calcium [Corn/SBM dietary phytic acid + 0.9% Calcium (2:1; H20:feed)] Angel and Applegate, 2000

  8. 2 mmol Phytic Acid + 30 mmol Calcium [Corn/SBM dietary phytic acid + 0.9% Calcium (2:1; H20:feed)] pH = 2.5 Angel and Applegate, 2000

  9. 2 mmol Phytic Acid + 30 mmol Calcium [Corn/SBM dietary phytic acid + 0.9% Calcium (2:1; H20:feed)] pH = 6.5 pH = 2.5 Angel and Applegate, 2000

  10. 2 mmol Phytic Acid + 30 mmol Calcium [Corn/SBM dietary phytic acid + 0.9% Calcium (2:1; H20:feed)] pH = 6.5 pH = 2.5 Angel and Applegate, 2000

  11. 2 mmol phytic acid+ 30 mmol Calcium [corn/SBM St diet phytic acid content+ 0.9% Ca (2:1; H20:diet)] 100 100 100 97.9 84.7 62.1 51.7 26.4 11.1 7.9 1.5 % of the phytic acid P in solution Angel, 2007

  12. 2 mmol Phytic Acid+ 30 mmol Calcium [Corn/SBM St diet phytic acid content + 0.9% Ca (2:1; H20:diet)] 100 100 100 97.9 84.7 62.1 51.7 26.4 11.1 7.9 1.5 % of the phytic acid P in solution Proventriculus/ Gizard Proximal duodenum Distal duodenum to Ileum Angel, 2007

  13. Ca & IlealPhytate-P Hydrolysis: Chick * * Applegate et al., 2003

  14. Ca & IlealPhytate-P Hydrolysis: Chick % Tamim et al 2003, 2004, unpublished Applegate et al., 2003

  15. Ca & IlealPhytate-P Hydrolysis Tamim et al., 2003, 2004, unpublished; Applegate et al., 2003

  16. Phytic Acid + 250 ppm Cu (CuSO4) pH = 6.5 pH = 2.5

  17. Copper Sulfate addition to Broiler Diets Phytase U/kg Banks & Applegate, 2003

  18. Copper Sulfate addition to Broiler Diets a a,b b c Phytase U/kg Banks & Applegate, 2003

  19. Copper Sulfate addition to Broiler Diets a -0.055 (% of diet) a,b b -0.066 (% of diet) c Phytase U/kg Banks & Applegate, 2003

  20. Pang & Applegate, 2004

  21. Cu source & Phytase activity – pH6.5 CuSO4 CuCl TBCC Cu-Lys Cu-Citrate Pang & Applegate, 2004

  22. Apparent Phosphorus Retention (% of diet) as affected by Cu source a b b b c c Lysinate Chloride Sulfate Citrate 0.20 nPP 0.40 nPP 0 0 250 250 250 250 ppm Cu Banks & Applegate, 2004 a-c: P≤ 0.05

  23. Ca & Micro-mineral source – in vivo Phytate – P hydrolysis Ca: P < 0.0001Micro mineral: P=0.39Ca*Micro: P = 0.63 ------ 0 % Calcium ------ ------ 0.5 % Calcium ------ Tamim & Angel, 2003

  24. Conclusions(& Unresolved questions…….) • Calcium has a huge impact on PP hydrolysis. This effect is heavily affected by pH --- but even at acidic pHs it can influence PP hydrolysis by phytase • In laying hens vs chicks – lower impact of phytase on PP release. Possibly because of better PP hydrolysis in the absence of phytase • Cu (up to 250 ppm) & Zn (up to 160 ppm) have inconsistent impacts on PP hydrolysis & no effect on phytase efficacy (i.e. no interaction of phytase * Cu –or- phytase * Zn)

More Related