1 / 19

Interactions Among Air Quality and Climate Policies: Lectures 7 and 8 (abridged versions)

Interactions Among Air Quality and Climate Policies: Lectures 7 and 8 (abridged versions). Radiative forcing of climate (1750 to present): Important contributions from air pollutants. IPCC, 2007. Methane: Connecting global climate and ozone pollution. Arlene M. Fiore (GFDLNOAA)

zuzana
Download Presentation

Interactions Among Air Quality and Climate Policies: Lectures 7 and 8 (abridged versions)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Interactions Among Air Quality and Climate Policies: Lectures 7 and 8 (abridged versions)

  2. Radiative forcing of climate (1750 to present):Important contributions from air pollutants IPCC, 2007

  3. Methane: Connecting global climate and ozone pollution Arlene M. Fiore (GFDLNOAA) Jason West (University of North Carolina) Larry Horowitz (GFDL/NOAA) Vaishali Naik (GFDL/NOAA)

  4. Historical increase in atmospheric methane Variations of CH4Concentration (ppb) Over the Past 1000 years [Etheridge et al., 1998] 1600 1400 1200 1000 800 1500 1000 2000 Year

  5. Global Methane Emissions <25% uncertainty in total emissions Clathrates? Melting permafrost? PLANTS? 60-240 Keppler et al., 2006 85 Sanderson et al., 2006 10-60 Kirschbaum et al., 2006 0-46 Ferretti et al., 2006 [EDGAR 3.2 Fast-Track 2000; Olivier et al., Wang et al., 2004] BIOMASS BURNING + BIOFUEL 30 ANIMALS 90 WETLANDS 180 LANDFILLS + WASTEWATER 50 GAS + OIL 60 COAL 30 TERMITES 20 RICE 40 GLOBAL METHANE SOURCES Natural ~200 (Tg CH4 yr-1 ) Anthro ~300 (Tg CH4 yr-1 )

  6. Modern Methane cycle • The cycle is relatively simple since the dominent sink is well known (over 90% due to oxidation by OH radicals). The sources are another story. • The total atmospheric burden is ~5Pg (~1,780ppbv) with an atmospheric lifetime of ~9 years, which is modestly dependent on [CH4] itself. • Interestingly for a greenhouse gas with over 50% anthropogenic sources, its level in the atmosphere has stopped increasing over the last decade.

  7. Observed trend in surface CH4 (ppb) 1990-2004 Global Mean CH4 (ppbv) • Can we explain this? • Many hypotheses : • 1. Approach to steady-state • 2. Source Changes • Anthropogenic • Wetlands/plants • (Biomass burning) • 3. Transport changes • 4. Sink Changes (CH4+OH) • Humidity • Temperature • OH precursor emissions • overhead O3 columns NOAA GMD Network Data from 42 GMD stations with 8-yr minimum record is area-weighted, after averaging in bands 60-90N, 30-60N, 0-30N, 0-30S, 30-90S

  8. 100 Year IPCC scenarios for methane emissions Longterm Projections Are Very Uncertain (Tg CH4) to 2100 2100 SRES A2 - 2000

  9. Double dividend of methane controls: Improved air quality and reduced greenhouse warming CLIMATE: Radiative Forcing (W m-2) NOx OH  CH4 20% anth. NMVOC 20% anth. CO 20% anth. CH4 20% anth. NOx 20% anth. NMVOC 20% anth. CO 20% anth. CH4 20% anth. NOx AIR QUALITY: Change in population-weighted mean 8-hr daily max surface O3 in 3-month “O3 season” (ppbv) Steady-state results from MOZART-2 global chemical transport model West et al., 2006

  10. MOZART-2 [West et al., PNAS 2006; this work] TM3 [Dentener et al., ACP, 2005] GISS [Shindell et al., GRL, 2005] GEOS-CHEM [Fiore et al., GRL, 2002] IPCC TAR [Prather et al., 2001] X Tropospheric O3 responds approximately linearly to anthropogenic CH4 emission changes across models Anthropogenic CH4 contributes ~50 Tg (~15%) to tropospheric O3 burden ~5 ppbv to global surface O3 A.M. Fiore

  11. 0.7 1.4 1.9 How much can methane be reduced? (industrialized nations) 10% of anth. emissions 20% of anth. emissions 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 Methane potential reduction (Mton CH4 yr-1) Comparison: Clean Air Interstate Rule (proposed NOx control) reduces 0.86 ppb over the eastern US, at $0.88 billion yr-1 West & Fiore, ES&T, 2005

  12. July surface O3 reduction from 30% decrease inanthropogenic CH4 emissions Globally uniform emission reduction Emission reduction only in Asia Take Home 1. Ozone reduction is independent of location of methane reduction [pick the cheapest option] 2. Ozone reduction is generally largest in polluted regions [high nitrogen oxides] 3. Methane reduction is a win-win for climate and air quality Fiore et al., JGR, 2008

  13. CONCLUSIONS • Methane reduction is a win-win for climate and air quality. This is a robust result across global chemical transport models. • A 10% reduction should pay for itself and another 10% can be paid for with modest carbon credits. • The maximum impact on air quality is in high NOx regions. • The location of the methane reduction is not important for either climate or air quality, so pick the least expensive options.

  14. On To Lecture 8

  15. Surface Methane Abundance (ppb) DTropospheric O3 Burden (Tg) Characterizing the methane-ozone relationship with idealized model simulations Reduce global anthropogenic CH4 emissions by 30% Simulation Year Model approaches a new steady-stateafter 30 years of simulation Is the O3 response sensitive to the location of CH4 emission controls? A.M. Fiore

  16. Multi-model study shows similar surface ozone decreases over NH continents when global methane is reduced Full range of 12 individual models EUROPE N. AMER. S. ASIA E. ASIA • >1 ppbv O3 decrease over all NH receptor regions • Consistent with prior studies TF HTAP 2007 report draft available at www.htap.org

  17. Will methane emissions increase in the near future? Anthropogenic CH4 emissions (Tg yr-1) A2 Dentener et al., ACP, 2005 B2 Current Legislation (CLE) Scenario MFR

  18. Possible Emission Trajectories in the Near Future (2005 to 2030) Surface NOx Emissions 2030:2005 ratio 0.3 0.8 1.4 1.9 2.5 Anthropogenic CH4 Emissions (Tg yr-1) CLE Baseline A B C • Control scenarios reduce 2030 CH4 emissions relative to CLE by: • A)-75 Tg (18%) – cost-effective now • -125 Tg (29%) – possible with current technologies • -180 Tg (42%) – requires new technologies A.M. Fiore

  19. Summary: Climate and Air Quality Benefits From CH4 Control • Significant CH4 reductions can pay for themselves • Benefits are independent of reduction location • Target cheapest controls worldwide • Complementary to NOx, NMVOC controls and maximum benefit in high NOx regions • Robust response over NH continents across models • ~1 ppbv surface O3 for a 20% decrease in anthrop. CH4 • Decreases hemispheric background O3 •  Opportunity for joint international air quality-climate management

More Related