150 likes | 317 Views
South Lake Union On-Street Parking Plan. November 1, 2005 . Document existing on-street parking occupancy and turnover data Develop effective strategies to manage changing on-street parking demand Integrate on- and off-street parking programs to achieve neighborhood TDM benefits .
E N D
South Lake UnionOn-Street Parking Plan November 1, 2005
Document existing on-street parking occupancy and turnover data • Develop effective strategies to manage changing on-street parking demand • Integrate on- and off-street parking programs to achieve neighborhood TDM benefits Study Purpose
Key Considerations for a Unique Neighborhood • Flexible to respond to dynamic land use changes • Market based to respond actual demand levels • Fair and equitable for residents, businesses and employees • Limit penalty to existing residents • Prevent streetcar park-&-riders • Sustainable, promoting TDM and use of alternative modes
Existing Parking Conditions Inventory showed ~ 3,000 on-street parking spaces About 1/2 of area surveyed for occupancy and turnover Data collected on typical summer weekday
About 75 metered spaces near Westlake and Denny, with very low utilization • About 900 1 and 2-hour spaces scattered, with good utilization (60%-75%) • Remaining 2,000 unrestricted spaces very full, with very little turnover Occupancy and Capacity Analysis
Average duration at unrestricted spaces is 5 hours • 1- and 2-hour signed spaces with duration almost three hours over posted time limit • Results show low short-term demand and high employee (long-term) demand Usage Characteristics
Parkers aware of limited enforcement! • High rate and long duration of overtime violations • Significant abuse in loading & no parking zones Compliance
Eliminate time-limits, charge hourly rates for all on-street parking, except a minimum amount of parking set aside for exclusive residential use • Adopt market-rate pricing scenario that ensures on-street parking is available for business customers, residents and employees • Neighborhood-wide pricing provides TDM benefits by encouraging price-sensitive employees to change travel behavior • Demand-responsive system ensures: • Flexibility – to adjust to short- and long-term demands • Sensitivity – to real time use of supply • Responsiveness – to changing neighborhood dynamics Draft Plan RecommendationsAn Overview
Set on-street rates to achieve 85% optimal occupancy rate (1 of every 8 spaces is available) • by removing time limits, and • by making “regular” rate adjustments (demand responsive) • Operate meters from 8:00 AM to 6:00 PM as downtown • Set premium rates along key retail blocks to ensure customer access Draft PlanRecommendations On-Street Parking Pricing - Recommendations
Recommend one-time pay station rollout with full neighborhood metered in 2007 • Avoids parking displacement to adjacent areas • Will require 300-400 pay stations and take 4 to 6 months Draft PlanRecommendations Pay Station Installation Rollout - Recommendations Parking Enforcement - Recommendation • Add three PEOs and resources to ensure compliance (bringing total area patrol staff to four). • Enforcement critical for accurate data monitoring
To be successful, upfront investment required for meter procurement, signage, parking enforcement • Outreach and public information program will be needed to educate users about flexible pricing • Level of construction activity in SLU will present challenges and require coordinated planning Draft PlanRecommendations On-Street Parking Pricing and Rollout - Issues
Draft PlanRecommendations Residential Parking Recommendations • Short Term: Implement 2-Year “Pilot” Residential Parking Zone (RPZ) • Exclusive daytime and evening RPZ • Set aside minimum amount of on-street parking for residential use • Long Term: Make changes after SDOT conducts RPZ Policy Review (2006) • Considerlimiting permits per household or grandfathering in existing residents • Consider selling market rate residential monthly parking pass that allows on-street parking anywhere in neighborhood
Draft PlanRecommendations Residential Parking – Issues • Not feasible to provide on-street parking for all existing or future residents (would provide minimum amount, at least in the short-term) • SDOT to explore legal ability to limit RPZ permit sales. This could be a precedent setting issue as the U-District and other RPZ are interested in limiting permit sales • Determine legal and logistical feasibility of offering monthly residential passes, outside of SDOT’s RPZ program
November/December: Community outreach on draft plan recommendations • Attending November SLUFAN and CNC meetings • Meet with individual stakeholders • Attend DPD Urban Center Plan open house • Announce and distribute draft report availability • Comments deadline December 9, 2005 • January: Incorporate public comments into draft report and prepare final report • Throughout 2006: Address policy, budget, legislative, logistical and procurement issues • 2007: Implementation if approved Outreach & Next Steps
WE WANT TO HEAR FROM YOU!! Contact:Mary Catherine SnyderSDOT Project ManagerPhone: 206-684-8110 marycatherine.snyder@seattle.govFULL PLAN AVAILABLE AT: www.seattle.gov/transportation/parking/sluonstreetparking.htm