1 / 13

Research Session 3: Case studies in Living Lab application domains

Research Session 3: Case studies in Living Lab application domains. The 4 th ENoLL Living Lab Summer School 27 th -30 August 2013 Manchester School of Arts.

aine
Download Presentation

Research Session 3: Case studies in Living Lab application domains

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Research Session 3: Case studies in Living Lab application domains The 4thENoLL Living Lab Summer School 27th-30 August 2013 Manchester School of Arts Defining a strategy to attract stakeholders into an open innovation eco-system for precision agriculture in the region of Vojvodina (Serbia) Grigorios Chatzikostas[1] and Spyros Fountas[2] [1]BioSense Center, Faculty of Technical Sciences, University of Novi Sad, Serbia chatzikostas@biosense.rs [2] Agricultural University of Athens, Greece

  2. Overview The Problem: Precision agriculture adoption rates comparatively (very) low in Europe, particularly SEE The Opportunity: Vojvodina (Serbia) demonstrates a strong value chain in agriculture and advanced ICT sector The Challenge: Employing open innovation to engage users and raise the rates of PA adoption in the region

  3. Precision Agriculture (PA) A farming management concept based on observing, measuring and responding to inter and intra-field variability in crops through the use of advanced ICTs, with significant economic, environmental and other benefits. Adoption Rates USA 20%-80% Europe 0%-24% (Winstead et al 2009) (Lawson et al, 2011; Reichardt and Jurgens, 2008)

  4. PA: Is it about technology or about users? • Current approach is technology-push rather than user driven. • Focus on creation of devices, limited learning and knowledge development among users, thus low adoption rates. • This is where the Open Innovation approach becomes essential, in stimulating a mindset change across the entire value chain.

  5. Agriculture in Vojvodina: Facts and Figures Chernozem, also known as “black earth” • a black-coloured soil containing a high percentage of humus, phosphoric acids, phosphorous and ammonia • very fertile, produces high agricultural yield • covers 52% of the agricultural land in Vojvodina Vojvodina accounts for 35% of the total agricultural land in Serbia and the agricultural sector provides 40% of the total industrial production of the region. +: A dynamic and extrovert ICT sector with strong established companies and lots of start ups

  6. Challenges for a newly established LL focused on PA in Vojvodina • LL methodology mostly developed for software/ digital services domain. • Farmers are among most vulnerable groups with respect to digital divide. • We need to: • Map our stakeholders (Foray, 2009) • Adapt the methodology • Attract a significant volume of users

  7. Stakeholders Mapping (1/3):Excited Goblins Features: Stakeholders eager to innovate and engage in co-design activities, even without external stimuli, essential for the inception phase of the LL. Strong Points: Early adopters, able to attract others, already familiar with concept of innovation. Weak Points: Very likely to dominate the LL and attract all resources at later stages of deployment. Vojvodina Case: Research Community, Vojvodina ICT Cluster, One individual farming company with strong export orientation and technological infrastructure

  8. Stakeholders Mapping (2/3):Sleeping Giants Features: Stakeholders that have a great potential and a great impact in the innovation process but require a specific strategy to be engaged in an open innovation assignment. Strong Points: Huge benefits from getting involved into the process, able to provide insights and validate technologies. Weak Points: Difficult to approach individually, low level of familiarization with innovation processes. Vojvodina Case: Regional Government of Vojvodina, Individual farmers

  9. Stakeholders Mapping (3/3):Hungry Dwarves Features: Stakeholders that would not enter early stages of innovation but would rather wait until the innovation process becomes financially lucrative. Strong Points: Able to contribute in the long-term sustainability of a LL and the commercialization of its results. Weak Points: Unwilling to participate at early stages, interested only in short term financial benefits. Vojvodina Case: Collective bodies of farmers (i.e. associations), Agricultural equipment vendors.

  10. Our Strategy Phase Stakeholders Excited Goblins Establishment Initial Deployment SleepingGiants Maturity/ Sustainability Hungry Dwarves

  11. In Practice Hosting Organization LL Partners Individual Farmers

  12. Shamans (spiritual healers) of indigenous tribes always gave the most difficult tasks to the young shamans because these young spirits didn't yet believe that these tasks were "impossible."

  13. Thank you for your kind attention Grigoris Chatzikostas BioSense Center, Faculty of Technical Sciences, University of Novi Sad chatzikostas@biosense.rs http://www.biosense.uns.ac.rs/

More Related