240 likes | 414 Views
Status and Challenges of Engineering Education in Korea. Myongsook S. Oh Department of Chemical Engineering, Hongik University KSEE AEDS 2013 Seoul, Korea May 7-8, 2013. South Korea. Population: 48,219,000 Area: 99,393 km 2 GDP: 15 th in the world in 2011
E N D
Status and Challenges of Engineering Education in Korea Myongsook S. Oh Department of Chemical Engineering, Hongik University KSEE AEDS 2013 Seoul, Korea May 7-8, 2013
South Korea • Population: 48,219,000 • Area: 99,393 km2 • GDP: 15th in the world in 2011 • Car manufacturing(5th), shipbuilding(1st), steel production(6th), semiconductor production(3rd) • Web connection:over 80% of the households • Percent of college enrollments: 72.5% in 2011, (33.2% in 1991, peaked in 2008 at 83.8%)
Educational Structure 6-3-3-4 years Ph. D. Master Bachelor 22 months of Military service (mandatory for male) College Scholastic Ability Test Mandatory
Statistics on Education Source: Statistical Yearbook of Education, 2012 Statistical Yearbook of Employment, 2012
Women in Engineering Source: Report on Women in Science and Technology, Jan. 2011 Korea Advanced Institute of Women in Science, Engineering, and Technology Female Faculty Ratio in all majors = 18.6 %
Challenges in Engineering Education Reference: The Status of Engineering Education in Korea and Suggestions for the Future, National Academy of Engineering in Korea (2010)
Perceived Challenges by Academia • Recruiting and retaining top students • Top students prefer medical school, law school, etc, causing engineering “brain-drain” • Decrease in population will make the situation tougher. • High school science curriculum and teaching pedagogy • Not enough science subjects are offered • Chemistry and physics are electives and avoided by majority of students • Rote learning is practiced, preparing for college entrance exam. • Research-emphasized faculty evaluation system • Research is emphasized regardless of each college’s research infrastructure and capability • And yet, the teaching load in most universities is heavy. Over 10 lecture hours/week is common, and class size often over 50.
Perceived Challenges by Students • Curriculum is designed to give the basics of each field, but not enough to get in-depth and/or broad knowledge of the field. • Not enough electives are offered • Fast -paced lectures and heavy assignment load • Lack of guidance for career development by faculty members • Lack of opportunities for hands-on experience and research • Low quality lectures and equipment for undergraduate laboratory • Accreditation: Despite the difficulties of fulfilling the requirements, there are few short-term benefits such as better employment opportunities • Social status of engineers are not on par with other industrialized countries. • Engineers are not distinguished from scientists, even in the industry • Engineers are not getting the level of recognition deserved despite their huge contribution to Korean economic growth.
Perceived Challenges by Industry • Recruiting top students to industry • Top students move on to medical schools, law schools, finance, and other professions after graduating with engineering degree • Top students prefer teaching and research organizations, e.g. universities, national labs • These trends worsened after massive lay-off of engineers in 1998 during national financial crises. • Training a new engineer to be self-sufficient takes an average of 3 years • Mismatch of supply and demand in different fields of engineering and levels of skills • Lack of IT engineers vs. overflow of engineers in conventional fields • Engineering curriculum • Insufficient up-to-date industrial examples in course materials
Education Policies from 1948-1990’s • Top down policies to support economic development plans and provide trained workers • Prior to 1975, 65% of educational budget was spent on primary education • Expanded support to secondary education after 1975 • Since late 1990s, investments were made to improve the quality of tertiary education • Standardized National curriculum • The federal government had the most control over the national curriculum • Expansion of school facilities came first • Quality improvements (e. g. class-size reduction) after 1990s
The Educational Reform in 1995 (I) • A new vision for educationsuitable for the twenty-first century knowledge-based economy • Open, lifelong education that would provide individuals with equal and easy access to education at any time and any place. • Education through technology. • Long-range goal was to raise the quality of education to a world-standard level of excellence. • Ambitious and comprehensive reform plans to restructure the entire education system • Deregulation and school governance reform • Curriculum reform (the 7th national curriculum) • Increase in public funding • Use of ICT in school and classrooms
The Educational Reform in 1996 (2) • Under the new vision, a well educated Korean is a person who • seeks to develop his/her own individuality on the basis of well-rounded and wholesome development • demonstrates creative ability on the basis of a solid grounding in basic knowledge and skills • explores career paths on the basis of broad intellectual knowledge and skills in diverse academic disciplines • creates new values on the basis of understanding the national culture • contributes to the development of the community where he/she lives, on the basis of democratic citizenship
The Seventh National Curriculum • The seventh curriculum since 1954 • Implemented in March 2000 • Aim to prepare students for the knowledge-based, globalized 21st century. • Emphasizes individuality, creativity, and knowledge of Korean culture as well as other cultures. • Students were allowed to choose their own courses in their final two years of high school. • Emphasis on foreign language education: English instruction begins in primary school and additional foreign language classes are offered in high school. • Chemistry and physics are electives and • avoided by majority of students
The Educational Reform in 1996:University Level Reform • Merge and consolidation of similar disciplines (e.g., Chemical Engineering and Industrial Chemistry) • Students were admitted to a school • A school can be a unit with more than 2 departments. • Transfer students were accepted • Information disclosure: Mandatory disclosure of enrollment rate, retention & graduation rate, employment rate, etc. • Funding for quality enhancement of higher education • Major department credits required: 35 units out of 130 ~ 140 total credits required to graduate • Introduction of an accreditation program to strengthen the engineering education
Programs for Quality Enhancement of Higher Education • Accreditation of Engineering Program (ABEEK) • Brain Korea 21 • The first phase: 1999 ~ 2005, US$ 1.4 billion • The second phase: 2006 ~ 2012, US$ 2.3 billion • New University for Regional Innovation (NURI): 2004 ~ 2008 • World-Class University: 2008 ~ 2012 • Innovation Centers for Engineering Education (ICEE) • The first phase: 2007 ~ 2011 • The second phase: 2012 ~ • Women in Engineering Program: 2007 ~ • Hub Universities for Industrial Collaboration: ‘08~’11 • Leaders in Industrial Collaborations: 2012 ~ • Industry sponsored programs: Samsung Talent Program, Display tracks
Accreditation of Engineering Program • Accreditation Board for Engineering Education in Korea (ABEEK) was formed in 1998. Accreditation began in 2001 • ABEEK is a full signatory of the Washington Accord, and a provisional member of the Sydney Accord and the Dublin Accord • ABEEK played a key role in establishing the Seoul Accord for the computing and IT-related education at the tertiary level. • As of March, 2012,624 programs in 95 universities (EAC : 539, CAC : 51, TAC : 34) have been accredited. Accredited Programs
Innovation Center for Engineering Education (ICEE) • Launched in 2007 and about 60 centers have completed the first 5-year program • The second stage of the ICEE project is starting in 2012 with a newly selected 65 centers nationwide. • Main objectives • To enhance engineering educational programs to meet the needs of the industries in the region • To seek a continuing collaboration with the industry on development of relevant educational contents. • Key Agenda • Development of need-based programs • Improvement of education/ teaching methods • Improvements of assessment/ evaluation systems • Enhancement of industry collaboration
ICEE Project Outcome • Visible • Increased industry satisfaction • Company Tailored tracks • Cultivation of design ability and skills through capstone design projects • Increased student satisfaction • PBL • Design Camps • Settlement of Abeek • Increased International exchanges between universities.. • Invisible • New wind to engineering education • Change of culture in universities • From Competition to Cooperation • From isolation to open environments:Exchange/sharing of projects • Minimization of trial and error • Contribution to other communities (KSEE, etc) Reference: Joo. W. J., The 3rd Annual Forum of SKKU Hub Center for ICEE, Hyatt Regency, Jeju, Korea (2011)
Women in Engineering Program • Launched in 2006, and funded 5 universities across Korea for 6 years • The second stage of the WIE program was expanded to 16 universities, covering different regions of Korea • Main objectives: • To promote inclusive class environment • To develop programs to enhance technical and non-technical competencies of female engineering students • To increase an employment rate of female students in their engineering disciplines
Industry Sponsored Programs • Samsung Talent program • Started in 2006 as Samsung Electronics Information and Communications track. Started its 2nd phase in 2011. Programs in EE&CS, Materials Sciences and Engineering, and Mechanical Engineering at 14 universities • Program details vary: An example in EE at Hongik University. • Two tracks: Semi-conductors and Communications • Students take 10 required subjects and 3 out of 10 electives. • Students get internship opportunities and preference in employment. Some receive scholarships. • Display Track • Co-sponsored by display industries and government • Interdisciplinary program. For example EE, Materials Sciences & Engineering and Chemical Engineering • Students take 16 credits (5-6 subjects) of display related subjects
Future Directions • More interdisciplinary/multidisciplinary studies • Increase in public funds/support and more financial aids/loans to students • Merge and consolidation of schools • More rigorous undergraduate education • Universities specializing different fields and developing unique programs • Enhanced Industry-University collaboration in education • Enhanced faculty training on education pedagogies and educational tools • Increase in-bound student mobility