270 likes | 282 Views
Charmonium Spectroscopy. The charmonium system has often been called the positronium of QCD . Non relativistic potential models (with relativistic corrections) and PQCD make it possible to calculate masses, widths and branching ratios to be compared with experiment.
E N D
Charmonium Spectroscopy The charmonium system has often been called the positronium of QCD. Non relativistic potential models (with relativistic corrections) and PQCD make it possible to calculate masses, widths and branching ratios to be compared with experiment. In pp annihilations states with all quantum numbers can be formed directly: the resonace parameters are determined from the beam parameters, and do not depend on energy and momentum resolution of the detector.
The c (11S0) Despite the recent measurements by E835not much is known about the ground state of charmonium: • the error on themass is stillbigger than 1 Mev • recent measurements givelarger widths than previously expected A large value of the c width is difficult to explain in terms of simple quark models. Also unusually large branching ratios into channels involving multiple kaons and pions have been reported. A precision measurements of the c mass, width and branching ratios is of the utmost importance, and it can only be done in by direct formation in pp.
The c(11S0) M(c) = 2979.9 1.0 MeV (c) = 25.5 3.3 MeV T. Skwarnicki – Lepton Photon 2003
The c (11S0) • Two photon channelc (weak branching ratioBR(c)=310-4). • Hadronic decay channels, with branching ratios which are larger by several orders of magnitude. • c +-K+K- • c 2(K+K-) • c 2(+-) • c KK • c • ... • c pp
Expected properties of the c(21S0) • The mass difference between the c and the can be related to the mass difference between the c and the J/ : • Various theoretical predictions of the c mass have been reported: • M(c) = 3.57 GeV/c2 [Bhaduri, Cohler, Nogami, Nuovo Cimento A, 65(1981)376]. • M(c) = 3.62 GeV/c2 [Godfrey and Isgur, Phys. Rev. D 32(1985)189]. • M(c) = 3.67 GeV/c2[Resag and Münz, Nucl. Phys. A 590(1995)735]. • Total width ranging from a few MeV to a few tens of MeV: (c) 5 25 MeV • Decay channels similar to c.
The c(21S0)Crystal Ball Candidate The first ´c candidate was observed by the Crystal Ball experiment: By measuring the recoil they found:
The c(21S0)E760/E835 search Both E760 and E835 searched for the c in the energy region: using the process: but no evidence of a signal was found 2 Crystal Ball
c(21S0) search in collisions at LEP The c has been looked for by the LEP experiments via the process: L3 sets a limit of 2 KeV (95 %C.L.) for the partial width (c). DELPHI data (shown on the right) yield:
The c(21S0) discovery by BELLE The Belle collaboration has recently presented a 6 signal for BKKSK which they interpret as evidence for c production and decay via the process: with: in disagreement with the Crystal Ball result, but reasonably consistent with potential model expectations. (DPF 2002).
Log-scale BaBar 88 fb-1 Preliminary c(21S0) M(c) = 3637.7 4.4 MeV (c) = 19 10 MeV T. Skwarnicki – Lepton Photon 2003
The c(21S0) In PANDA we will be able to identify the c in the following channels: • two photon decay channel c .This will require a substantial increase in statistics and reduction in background with respect to E760/E835: lower energy threshold, better angular and energy resolution, increased geometric acceptance. • The real step forward will be to detect the c through its hadronic decays, such as K+K- and . • c pp
The hc(1P1) Precise measurements of the parameters of the hc are of extreme importance in resolving a number of open questions: • Spin-dependentcomponent of the qq confinementpotential. A comparison of the hc mass with the masses of the triplet P states measures the deviation of the vector part of the qq interaction from pure one-gluon exchange. • Total width and partial width to c+ will provide an estimate of thepartial width to gluons. • Branching ratios forhadronic decaysto lower cc states.
Expected properties of the hc(1P1) • Quantum numbers JPC=1+-. • The mass is predicted to be within a few MeV of the center of gravity of the c(3P0,1,2) states • The width is expected to be small (hc) 1 MeV. • The dominant decay mode is expected to be c+, which should account for 50 % of the total width. • It can also decay to J/: J/ + 0 violates isospin J/ + +- suppressed by phase space and angular momentum barrier
The hc(1P1) E760 observation A signal in the hc region was seen by E760 in the process: Due to the limited statistics E760 was only able to determine the mass of this structure and to put an upper limit on the width:
The hc(1P1) E835 search E835 has performed a search for the hc, in the attempt to confirm the E760 results and possibly add new decay channels. Data analysis is still under way in various decay channels • hc c + ()+ • hc c + ()+ (4K)+ • hc J/+0 (e+e-)+()
The hc(1P1) It is extremely important to identify this resonance and study its properties.To do so we need: • High statistics: the signal will be very tiny • Excellent beam resolution: the resonance is very narrow • The ability to detect its hadronic decay modes. The search and study of the hc is a central part of the experimental program of the PANDA experiment at GSI.
Charmonium States abovethe DD threshold The energy region above the DD threshold at 3.73 GeV is very poorly known. Yet this region is rich in new physics. • The structures and the higher vector states ((3S), (4S), (5S) ...) observed by the early e+e- experiments have not all been confirmed by the latest, much more accurate measurements by BES. It is extremely important to confirm the existence of these states, which would be rich in DD decays. • This is the region where the first radial excitations of the singlet and triplet P states are expected to exist. • It is in this region that the narrow D-states occur.
The D wave states • The charmonium “D states” • are above the open charm • threshold (3730 MeV ) but • the widths of the J= 2 states • and are expected • to be small: forbidden by parity conservation forbidden by energy conservation • Only the , considered to be largely state, has • been clearly observed
The D wave states • The only evidence of another D • state has been observed at Fermilab • by experiment E705 at an energy of • 3836 MeV, in the reaction: • This evidence was not confirmed • by the same experiment in the • reaction • and more recently by BES
New State Observed by Belle BK (J/+-), J/µ+µ- or e+e- • Possible Interpretations • D0D0* molecule • (13D2) state • Charmonium hybrid • ... M = 3872.0 0.6 0.5 MeV 2.3 MeV (90 % C.L.)
Charmonium States abovethe DD threshold It is extremely important to identify all missing states above the open charm threshold and to confirm the ones for which we only have a weak evidence. This will require high-statistics, small-step scans of the entire energy region accessible at GSI.
Radiative transitions of the J(3PJ) charmonium states The measurement of the angular distributions in the radiative decays of the c states provides insight into the dynamics of the formation process, the multipole structure of the radiative decay and the properties of the cc bound state. Dominated by the dipole term E1. M2 and E3 terms arise in the relativistic treatment of the interaction between the electromagnetic field and the quarkonium system. They contribute to the radiative width at the few percent level. The angular distributions of the 2 and 2 are described by 4 independent parameters:
Angular Distributions of the c states • The coupling between the set of states and pp is described by four independent helicity amplitudes: • 0 is formed only through the helicity 0 channel • 1 is formed only through the helicity 1 channel • 2can couple to both • The fractional electric octupole amplitude, a3E3/E1, can contribute only to the 2 decays, and is predicted to vanish in the single quark radiation model if the J/ is pure S wave. • For the fractional M2 amplitude a relativistic calculation yields: where c is the anomalous magnetic moment of the c-quark.
c1(13P1) AND c2(13P2) ANGULAR DISTRIBUTIONS Interesting physics. Good test for models Predicted to be 0 or negligibly small
c1(13P1) AND c2(13P2) ANGULAR DISTRIBUTIONS McClary and Byers (1983) predict that ratio is independent of c-quark mass and anomalous magnetic moment
Angular Distributions of the c states The angular distributions in the radiative decay of the 1 and 2 charmonium states have been measured for the first time by the same experiment in E835. While the value of a2(2) agrees well with the predictions of a simple theoretical model, the value of a2(1) is lower than expected (for c=0) and the ratio between the two, which is independent of c, is 2 away from the prediction. This could indicate the presence of competing mechanisms, lowering the value of the M2 amplitude at the 1. Further, high-statistics measurements of these angular distributions are clearly needed to settle this question.