1 / 34

Technology - Microelectronics - Knowledge - Language

Technology - Microelectronics - Knowledge - Language Some aspects of secret relationships between spectacular partners. Giambattista Vico (Napoli 1709): >> verum et factum convertuntur; (fantastico universale) <<. Technology - Microelectronics - Knowledge - Language 1. Introduction

aquarius
Download Presentation

Technology - Microelectronics - Knowledge - Language

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Technology - Microelectronics - Knowledge - Language Some aspects of secret relationships between spectacular partners Giambattista Vico (Napoli 1709): >> verum et factum convertuntur; (fantastico universale) <<

  2. Technology - Microelectronics - Knowledge - Language • 1. Introduction • 1.1 Inverse semantics • 1.2 Anthropological concept of “Unity in Multiplicity” • 2. Microelectronics – Perspectives and some new Questions • 2.1 Example Infineon • 2.2 “The Pig Cycle” • 2.3 Dresden • 3. On the evolution of Technology and Language • 3.1 Semantic Anthropology - preconditions for “Truth” • 3.2 The Will to Word – an Explosive Concept • 3.3 Knowledge is a “secret” Question • 3.4 Evolution of Technology • 4. Culture and Semantics • 3.1 From Neolithic Revolution to the invention of Mega Machine • 3.2 Democracy and alternatives • 3.3 Industrial and Information Society • 3.4 The problem with “Truth” - on “Limits” of formalization • 5. Unity in Multiplicity

  3. 1.1 Inverse Semantics

  4. 1.1 Inverse Semantics

  5. 1.1 Inverse Semantics Informatics: the ‘+’ and ‘-’ commands, which actually have inverse semantics; ‘+’ means go faster, decreasing this factor, and similar for ‘-’. Psychology: ‘Inversion’ is a common creativity technique. Inverse Semantics: Knowledge is also always a potential Question. Overcome the actual system boundaries by introducing new ideas. Our Mind is a real open system – be proud of it and use it!

  6. 1.1 Inverse Semantics

  7. 1.1 Inverse Semantics Wolf Singer: the architecture of the brain as a model for complex cities. In the beginning only few system elements: hierarchical, centralized top-down-structures (villages, prehistoric live). Optimization of Information flows, minimization of energy consumption: self organization of unit components (i.e. networks of streets, people, local centers) „binding problem“. Construct cities not as a whole (Brasilia), <Reasoning> of self organization Internet as a model of brain structure ?

  8. Giambattista Vico (Napoli 1709): The spectacular Emergence of Language within the >>universale fantastico<< („explosive“ Dimensions of Knowledge: Language mobilizes Thinking, Art and Culture) 1.2 Anthropological Concept of “Unity in Multiplicity”

  9. 2.1 Information processing in Neural Nets The „Binding problem“: not only true for „Gestalt“, but also for Organization (Central Power vs. Decentralized Democracy)

  10. 1.2 Inverse Semantics - the Risked Reason Philosophical Anthropology (physicians in the 18. and 19. century): Man is not the triumphing creature - running from victory to victory. A lot of defects can be shown on Man in comparison to animals. But Man is able to compensate those defects with his mind. With this concept of ”homo compensator” (Odo Marquard) the strengths and defects of human evolution can be characterised. The Risked Reason: - appearance of the black wall of the future - Semantic stability of knowledge becomes a problem

  11. 2. Microelectronics – Example Infineon2.1 Infineon‘s Global DRAM Network - Today

  12. 2.1 Infineon - Top Ranking from 9 to 6 In the last 4 years: • Nr. 1 Security and Chipcard • Nr. 2 Automotove • Nr. 1: - Ethernet via VDSL- ISDN - 40 Gigabit (WAN-MAN) • Nr. 2: SHDSL • Top 3 Manufacturer for GSM-ICs • Leading in High Frequency (Silicon Discretes) • Nr. 4 Memory Products • Nr. 6 within the Top 10 1 HY 02 1 HY01 1. Intel 1% 2. Samsung 7% 3. TI -14% 4. ST Micro -18% 5. Toshiba -29% 6. Infineon -5% 7. NEC -25% 8. Motorola -16% 9. TSMC 15% 10. Philips -16% Umsatz Mrd US $: 1HY01 1HY02 Quelle: Top 10 Ranking:IC Insights, Juli 2002

  13. growth ca. 15 % 1990 = 100 % 400% 50% Halbleiter 300% 40% Pharma 30% 250% Decision for Dresde 20% Elektro 200% 10% Chemie 0% 150% -10% 100% -20% 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 Jahr Wachstum p.a. Wachstum p.a.Vorhersage Durchschnittliches Wachstum p.a. -50 % 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 1960-200 Quelle: McKinsey • Since 40 years we see the „pig cycle“: -30% to +50% per Year • 2001: -32% biggest Downturn in the history of Semiconductor Median Growth 1990 - 2000 for : Semiconductor: 15,0 % Pharma 9,8 % Electo 8,7 % Chemy 3,6 % 2.2 „The Pig Cycle“

  14. 2.3 Production site Dresden - bird’s eye view Facilities 300mm Site Gas-Farm CR-Module Support CMP Office-Building Gowning-Area Wafer-Test Backend Parking

  15. 2.3 The clean room Only 3.5 m of height is reserved for the production of the semiconductors chips; the remaining space belongs to the supply area Quelle: Sommerschule für Mikroelektronik - Dresden, Hr. Leitermann

  16. 2.3 View into theclean room Quelle: Sommerschule für Mikroelektronik - Dresden, Hr. Leitermann

  17. 2.3 Production Process - 400 to 800 process steps - 3 weeks to 3 months (24h/day, 7 days/week) - 50 products -> 200.000 equipment setups - dynamic, networked process flow

  18. Gate Array Compared with a soccer field, the dimensions of nowadays chips (less 0,1 μm) are less than 1 mm. Standard Cell Abstract Cell 2.3 Product Dimensions

  19. 1G 2.3 Moore‘s Law: Example 64M SDRAM 0.17µm - 25 mm2 2000 1996 0.19µm - 32 mm2 0.20µm - 43 mm2 0.24µm - 62 mm2 0.25µm - 83 mm2 Never stop shrinking! 64M DRAM 0.35µm - 167 mm2

  20. p- n- Periphery p- p- n- Array parallel Bit-Line n- n- 1 µm n- n- 2.3 Process Flow / DRAM Planar Technology growths into the 3rd Dimension p- p- Fuse Bank

  21. 2.3 DRAM Trench Cell principle „M1“ AlCu stitching Wordlines M2 lines (power, signals) „GC“ WSi Wordlines(cell transistor gate) Bitlines(to sense amplifier) Trench capacitor(8 µm depth)

  22. 2.4 Knowledge Emergence within the “Pig Cyle” Process step: choose Machine, control Machine status Conditions Conditions Actions Actions ? : defined by Engineer : modified by Operator : invented by Operator

  23. 1.1 Introduction: Semantic Gravitation and Resonance Neueren Arbeiten zufolge wurden die Pyramidenbauer aus der aegyptischen Bevölkerung rekrutiert. Neuartig war allerdings die Erfindung eines entsprechend umfassenden „Arbeitssystems“, das selbst wiederum zum Wissensaufbau in der Bevölkerung beitrug. Organisation und Installierung von Machtstrukturen als exteriorialisierte Körperlichkeit

  24. 1.1 Introduction: Semantic Gravitation and Resonance The Will to Word – an Explosive Concept • On the one hand • since 20 - 50 k years we perceive technological innovations, which sustainable change ourselves and create our culture • improved hunting by the invention of modern diversified techniques, also by the organization of time (i.e. table of moon phases) • invention of agriculture: invention of culture • built pyramids • Invent democracy (distributed knowledge organization) • took less then a decade to invent moon rocket • Takes a half-century for politicians to peacefully create better institutions like the EU and the € Euro.

  25. 1.1 Introduction: Semantic Gravitation and Resonance The Will to Word – an Explosive Concept • On the other hand • since 20 - 50 k years technological innovations, which pushed us dramatically in problem areas • “Overkill” in north america. • Anything that disrupts food for urban populations risks a spectacular crash. • End of Egyptian culture due to inflexibility in their centralized cultural organization (“mega-machine”). • Took less then a decade to invent atomic bomb. • Concepts of “Artificial Intelligence” never succeeded as promised. • “Capitalism unmasked” (Noam Chomsky): Risk of re-invention of mega-machine (centralized knowledge organization) • William H. Calvin: We’re recently risen apes, you realize that there simply hasn’t been much time in which to evolve a less buggy version 2.0. • Out of Africa occurred too soon after creative intelligence evolved in Africa.

  26. internal aktivations 1 start target start Neural Net 3. On the evolution of technology and language3.1 Information processing in Neural Nets target external aktivations 2 perceptor operator body

  27. 3. On the evolution of technology and language3.1 Semantic Gravitation ... be attracted by an action or a solution ! Semantic Gravitation and Resonance: distributed connectivity (verteilte Gebundenheit)

  28. 3. On the evolution of technology and language3.1 Semantic Gravitation and Resonance

  29. Know-How 3.2 Knowledge is a “secret” Question (1/2) „Gestalt“, Thermodynamically characterizable structure Knowledge is not an atomic, but a distributed creation (unity in multiplicity) Action goals Personal-conceptual, nonverbal, but abstract implicit knowledge: categories of thinking (space, time, causality) Spontaneous, creative processes, structural new ideas (“Gestalt”) X X X Reg Self Real • actor Feeling “Truth” perceptor operator body 1. Generation of Instability / Indetermination 2. Projection of body scheme / reality / goal 3. „Abstraction“ through repetition, i.e. multiple repetitions of networked ways -> spontaneous creation of a new classes/ideas

  30. 3.2 Knowledge is a “secret” Question (1/2) • Example „standing waves“: • - Completely new problem situation • - Important measurement error • - Follow up process with undefined Tolerances • Solution: • Activation of tacit, implicit Knowledge from • unconnected Experience Contexts • Overcoming the actual boundaries of the • Cognitive System by inventing new “idea” • - i.e. introduction of a anti reflexion layer

  31. 3.2 Semantic Anthropology Creation of Culture

  32. 3.2 Semantic Anthropology

  33. 3.2 Semantic Anthropology

  34. 3.2 Semantic Anthropology

More Related