1 / 18

THE SUPPORT OF THE MINISTRY OF SCIENCE AND HIGHER EDUCATION UNDER THE GRANT S

www.put.poznan.pl. http://www.cmm.il.pw.edu.pl/. THE SUPPORT OF THE MINISTRY OF SCIENCE AND HIGHER EDUCATION UNDER THE GRANT S N519 - 419435 AND R00-0097-12 IS KINDLY ACKNOWLEDGED. O utline: - Motivation - Introductory remarks - Objectives and numerical analysis: - Structural safety

ardith
Download Presentation

THE SUPPORT OF THE MINISTRY OF SCIENCE AND HIGHER EDUCATION UNDER THE GRANT S

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. www.put.poznan.pl http://www.cmm.il.pw.edu.pl/ THE SUPPORT OF THE MINISTRY OF SCIENCE AND HIGHER EDUCATION UNDER THE GRANTS N519-419435 AND R00-0097-12 IS KINDLY ACKNOWLEDGED

  2. Outline: - Motivation - Introductory remarks - Objectives and numerical analysis: - Structural safety -Public safety - Results - Conclusions http://www.cmm.il.pw.edu.pl/ THE SUPPORT OF THE MINISTRY OF SCIENCE AND HIGHER EDUCATION UNDER THE GRANTS N519-419435 AND R00-0097-12 IS KINDLY ACKNOWLEDGED

  3. Motivation: The elements of critical infrastructure are often under explosive risk, and must be protected - Airports - Railway Stations - Trade & Business centers - Banks - Fuel depots and storages - Government agencies Objective: Pressure distribution and structural damage

  4. Introductory Remarks: - The office structure (the main structure) is subjected to explosion - The analysis demands a compelx caluculations (complexity, dof). This time the general problem of safety is uncoupled into three jobs: A) STRUCTURAL ELEMENT SAFETY (steel column) B) GLOBAL STRUCURE SAFETY (whole RC structure) C) PERSONEL SAFETY (pressure evolution)

  5. Introductory Remarks: Structural safety criteria 1. Acceleration for equipment 3g, t > 1200s; 5g, t > 60s; 8g, t > 10s; 18g, t > 0.2s; 25g, t > 0.001s; 60g (database server) 2. Stress & Strain for structural elements Depending on material kind, compression, tension, strain rate, loading peaks and impulses Public safety criteria Human tolerance to the blast output of an explosion is relatively high. However, the orientation of a person (standing, sitting, etc.) is really important. The pressure tolerance for short-duration blast loads is significantly higher than that for long-duration blast loads. There are used two separate criteria, in agreement US standard i.e. Unified Facilities Criteria (UFC 3-340-02), for assessment public safety. 1. Eardrums rupture for overpressure above 40 000 [Pa], and impulse duration 0.2 [Pa·s] 2. Lung damage depends on overpressure-impulse and person weight

  6. Objectives and Numerical Analysis: Structural safety Case A – Steel column Objective: To find a limit value of scaled distance (Z) for safety design Geometry Steel column (H-section), IPE300, 3m high, fixed-joint boundaries Material Johnson-Cook model for stainless steel [Akbari, Joodaki 2005] Numerical job 72e3 S4R elements (0.005x0.005m2), time of the analysis is 52e3s (1CPU 2.6XEON) 1. Initial Static loading (10s) Dominant is vertical force (effort below 90%) 2. Explosive loading CONWEP (0.01s) 0.1kg of TNT in 0.25m distance 3. Assessment of limit loading (10s) Upper boundary movement (1cm/10s) Δ F0 F0 F0 explosive loading

  7. Objectives and Numerical Analysis: Structural safety Case A – Steel column Results IPE300 The results for the 1kg of TNT in 0.25m distance The FE mesh is decreased in to 0.05 by 0.05 m2 element size

  8. Objectives and Numerical Analysis: Structural safety Case A – Steel column Different failure criteria for steel elements

  9. Objectives and Numerical Analysis: Structural safety Case A – Steel column Results IPE300 for close (distance <1m) explosions The different high of the columns are analyzed, under different explosions (4x16 examples) Zmin = 0.22 Zmin = 0.16 Limit vertical load must be lower than 90% of limit loading Maximum support rotation for beams is 2 deg (TM5-1300)

  10. Objectives and Numerical Analysis: Structural safety Case A – Steel column Results HEB600 for close explosions (distance <1m) The different high of the columns are analyzed, under different explosions (3x19 examples) Zmin = 0.14 Zmin = 0.17 Maximum support rotation for beams is 2 deg Limit vertical load must be lower than 90% of limit loading

  11. Objectives and Numerical Analysis: Structural safety Case B – Whole structure Objective: General assessment of whole structure safety The explosive pressure is subjected to reinforced concrete structure. The homogenous RC material is loaded by the overpressure. Geometry RC structure 30x30m2 and 20m high (6 floors) Material Elastic RC concrete with stress limit (FE deletion) Ideal Gas Equation of the state for the Ambient Air JWL Equation of the state for the Explosive Numerical job EOS ~5e6 EC3D8 finite elements (0.2x0.2x0.2m3), Def. ~2e6 C3D8 finite elements (0.1x0.1x0.1m3) Time of the analysis is 26h (8CPU 2.6XEON) 1. Initial Static loading 450kg/m2 2. Explosive loading CEL 1000kg of TNT in 2.0m distance form the frontal facade

  12. Objectives and Numerical Analysis: Structural safety Case B – Whole structure The results FE failure criteria Compression -80.0MPa Tension +1.0MPa t=0.001s after detonation t= 0.01s after detonation

  13. Objectives and Numerical Analysis: Structural safety Case C – Public safety Objective: Overpressure distribution inside a building Geometry Rigid geometry of the building simulates the reflection of the blast wave Material Ideal Gas Equation of the state for the Ambient Air JWL Equation of the state for the Explosive Numerical job ~5e6 C3D8 finite elements (0.2x0.2x0.2m3), time of the analysis is 8h (8CPU 2.6XEON) 1. Initial Static loading 450kg/m2 2. Explosive loading CEL 100kg of TNT in 2.0m distance form the frontal facade

  14. Objectives and Numerical Analysis: Structural safety Case C – Public safety The blast wave reflection from the rigid body

  15. Objectives and Numerical Analysis: Structural safety Case C – Public safety Personnel safety criteria (TM5-1300, UFC), for SI units Lung Damage Ear drums rupture

  16. Objectives and Numerical Analysis: Structural safety Case C – Public safety Results The limit value for personnel safety has been set on 250000Pa (grey elements) The blast wave front (>150000Pa) propagates through the structure

  17. Conclusions • A1. Limit values of scaled distance are obtained for steel columns • A2. Scaled distance is different for close and far field explosive action • A3. Further study enforces using of advanced material behavior • B1. Analysis of whole RC structure + steel reinforcement ! • B2. Air discretisation vs. the results • C1. Personnel safety is analyzed, what about fragmentation ?

  18. Poznan University of Technology Thank you for your attention ! e-mail: tomasz.lodygowski@put.poznan.pl piotr.sielicki@put.poznan.pl

More Related