1 / 8

MTAC

MTAC. Workgroup 100 Seamless Acceptance for MLOCR Environment. Co-chairs Industry – Jay Gillotte USPS – Pritha Mehra. Workgroup Objectives. Issue Title Identify gaps & define capabilities for seamless acceptance for MLOCR Issue Statement

armani
Download Presentation

MTAC

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. MTAC Workgroup 100 Seamless Acceptance for MLOCR Environment Co-chairs Industry – Jay Gillotte USPS – Pritha Mehra

  2. Workgroup Objectives • Issue Title • Identify gaps & define capabilities for seamless acceptance for MLOCR • Issue Statement • Define capabilities of seamless acceptance for MLOCR for First Class Mail. • Desired Results • Identify gaps that inhibit electronic statements and documentation. • Evaluate Web Services and Mail.dat technologies • Define capabilities of seamless acceptance.  • Identify gaps in feedback of verification information to the mailer.

  3. Seamless Acceptance Pilot • Pilot analysis for MLOCR mailers since Sept. 06 • Prudential (IMB): 126 FCM jobs, 5,247,594 pieces • PSI (IMB): 87 FCM jobs, 869,363 pieces • ZipSort (Unique IMB): 41 FCM jobs, 52,562 pieces • Using piece scan data to verify: • Mailpiece Count • Barcode Quality • Presort Errors • Minimum Piece Count per ZIP Group • Address Validity • Address Hygeine

  4. Pilot Findings Seamless Acceptance is Feasible • Electronic Documentation Quality • Piece counts differences between Tray and Piece Files close to 0% • Piece to Tray associations are nearing 100% • Mailpiece Counts • Increases in scan rate allow accurate determination of the number of manifested pieces • Barcode Quality • High barcode quality results in 98% average scan rate • Presort Errors • Errors caught by MERLIN are also found by SAVP • Address Validity • Average 1.5% invalid POSTNET • Address Hygiene • COA and Returned Mail percentages can be evaluated

  5. Pilot Enhancements • Mailers applying Intelligent Mail® barcode with delivery point • Mailers submitting Mail.dat files • Receiving automated feed of address change information • Applying 10/24 Intelligent Tray barcode at one facility • Have initiated tray scan analysis

  6. Postage Assessment - Principles Assessment approach will be validated/revised as we pilot. • All mail and corresponding manifests within a 24 hour period treated as a single mailing • Adjustments calculated for each mailing but postage assessed on a monthly basis • Adjudication Period • Each facility treated as a separate mailing entity • Mailers can review status of each mailing as data is received • Statistical sampling used to establish tolerances for each assessment category • Adjustments can be limited to specific mail within a mailing (i.e. by machine, by mail owner) Draft

  7. Next Steps • Expand Charter of group to pilot implementation • Finalize feedback approach • Pilot postage assessment approach • Determine appropriate tolerances for each verification element • Expand pilot to other classes of mail

  8. Questions?

More Related